Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE 禄

Wikipedia brands the Daily Mail an unreliable source.馃槀

A new low for that trash.

Picklebobble256-60, M
Well it IS unreliable.
But coming from Wikipedia that's a good example of pot calling the kettle black.
thatscottishguy26-30, M
Embarrassing for the Mail though so it's great.
Picklebobble256-60, M
Oh i've no time for that rag.
Funny, that's literally what I thought at [b]Wiki[/b] saying so, "Pot, meet the kettle..." 馃槄
Isn't the Daily Mail like our National Inquirer ?
CierzoM
I would agree if they would brand every media as unreliable
cherokeepatti61-69, F
that's the truth. They do post the embarrassing stories that happen in my state of Oklahoma, like the teacher who was arrested for indecent exposure because she did cartwheels in front of the class while not wearing underwear. The kind of story that yellow journalism feeds off of.
cherokeepatti61-69, F
@cherokeepatti: Here's the video of that incident, they didn't post it on DM but it's on You Tube..
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCN-l3AqdXM]
mic1122526-30, M
this just in water is wet
DeusVult26-30, M
[c=#1F5E00]Honestly, it's about time. It's just as bad if not worse than buzzfeed when it comes to content quality.[/c]
cherokeepatti61-69, F
They publish articles about the crap that happens here in Oklahoma all-too-frequently. That kinda is amusing for me.
firefall61-69, M
unreliable isn't quite right. It's reliably dishonest & disgusting.
UDontKnowMe80-89, M
Is there any part of 'the media' that is reliable and that doesn't try to escalate all news to stimulate voyeurism and gawping? And while we are on the subject, it is time that rent-a-crowds were made illegal as well as paying people to cry.
thatscottishguy26-30, M
True most of the media is but Daily Mail are in there with the most pathetic.
Elegy46-50
How is that a headline?
thatscottishguy26-30, M
It's funny and the Guardian would want to shame the Daily Mail.

 
Post Comment