Top | Newest First | Oldest First
This message was deleted by its author.
eli1601 · 70-79, M
@MarmeeMarch I'm still wondering who and how many get to classify something in the first place.
trollslayer · 46-50, M
I call bullshit. My gut tells me they have a pretty good idea how the leak occurred or by whom, and there are reasons why they cannot pursue that lead or reveal that information.
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 41-45, MVIP
Can’t find a pipe bomber.
Epstien client list has vanished.
Can’t find a SCOTUS leaker.
I’m sure there is something we can impeach orange man for tho… stay tuned
Epstien client list has vanished.
Can’t find a SCOTUS leaker.
I’m sure there is something we can impeach orange man for tho… stay tuned
BizSuitStacy · M
Sounds pathetic
bgjb58 · M
What a shock!
Barefooter25 · 46-50, M
I am sure Roberts had something to do with it. But no worries, the Boulder Co. Police Dept. has been assigned to this case and any day now, a breakthrough or arrest will be made.
PatKirby · M
Barefooter25 · 46-50, M
@PatKirby It would also take them hardly anytime to find out who the Supreme Court leaker is. Sometimes tv detectives, even inept ones like Inspector Clousseu, are better at handling cases than some of the real ones.
PatKirby · M
TexChik · F
I would suspect Roberts . He acquiesced to Obama and Obama care .
black4white · 56-60, M
They never should have over turned this.... get from between HER legs....gggeeezzzzz
Slade · 56-60, M
@black4white ^IQ Killer^
black4white · 56-60, M
@Slade what do you mean?
akindheart · 61-69, F
that is really hard to swallow that they didn't find anyone in particular? come on man
graphite · 61-69, M
They know exactly who leaked it but that person is above the law.