@Pikachu Surely would not want to offend anybody that unleashed a killer virus on the world now, would we?

@sunsporter1649

Surely you can read plain English, yes?
Read carefully:

It's not about offense. It's about harm to innocent people.
Harm to not just Chinese immigrants but American citizens of Chinese descent, Japanese, Taiwanese, Korean....these people face social, financial and physical threats because of propaganda intended to place the blame at these people's feet.

That is the documented effect of the sort of finger pointing you're engaging in and supporting by saying things like "kung flu" and promulgating the notion that it is important to lay the blame on the Chinese because the disease originate there.

So that was your second deflection. You attempted to straw man my criticism as an objection to mere offense.
I have now explained your error.

You like to play at being an intellectual...show me that you can think through an issue.
Don't respond with a silly deflection or straw man.
Control your ego. Stop. Think......respond.

I'll give you one more chance.

[b][i][u][c=800000]Why do you feel the need to say something like "kung flu"?
What makes you feel the need to assign the origin of a disease to a certain country or culture rather than just referring to it by the universally accepted scientific nomenclature?

Can you give a logical justification for that or is it just racism and xenophobia peaking through?[/c][/u][/i][/b]


Come on! I know if you try real hard you can squeeze at least one honest response! 🙏😇

@Pikachu [quote]@someone else: Can you give a logical justification for that or is it just racism and xenophobia peaking through?[/quote]

You are a nasty low-life. No one should bother trying to reason with you. You're too full of hate and venom. 🤨

@Budwick

@Thinkerbell

lol Oh my that's a lot of 😂[i]'s[/i]...overcompensating a little, perhaps?

[quote]it at all would have been too embarrassing[/quote]

Well you're certainly entitled to your opinion. I maintain that her statement was simply not contentious enough in the estimation of many people to be considered newsworthy.

[quote]...says the unhappy left-wing tribalist.[/quote]

Oh Tink....when you find yourself reduced to [i]"I know you are but what am iiii?!"[/i] then maybe it's time to pack it in, hmm?
Reflect on how many times i call people idiotic and crazy or any other combination of petty insults for believing differently than i do vs how often you, yourself engage in that behaviour🙂✌️

Yeah....

@Pikachu

No dice Piksie; you botched it yet again. 😂 😂 😂

@Thinkerbell

[i]Much[/i] better than your first poem👏👏👏

But it's plain that you resort to shallow verse when you find yourself unable to make a thoughtful rebuttal.
I'm sure it distracts and fools some people but you'll have to do better than that with me.
...
Or to put in the framework you've exemplified: No YUR the bad one!😂😂😂

You're not a stupid person, i can tell. Don't behave this way please.

@graphite it's unconstitutuinal to find something unconstitutional. Braindead fool

@Slade We really didn't want to believe someone of such low ability could get a position like that but here it is, we see it with our own eyes.

@graphite with this bunch it would be shocking if she was anything but

@BohemianBoo conservatives don't like privacy, so it's not in the constitution for them.

@BohemianBoo

@sunsporter1649 [image]

@Roundandroundwego

^from inside the rubber room^

@MistyCee Have you listened to her?

@ron122 Not recently, and given the racist homophobic intro, I'm not inclined to bother to do it again.

It's kind of like lying about inauguration crowds. Once you get a reputation, it's hard to get past it.

@MistyCee She belongs on a bottle of maple syrup

@nedkelly that's 99% of the time

@nedkelly Like Joe? He has made sure he is surrounded by stupid people.

@nudistsueaz Joe would be better utilized as a street cone on a construction site.

Give him a neato orange and white uni

@graphite They aren't when it is convenient for their dams.