Secret Service will say no new Jan. 6 texts found after records were deleted; investigation requested

A letter sent Wednesday by the inspector general to the heads of the House and Senate Homeland Security Committees said the messages were deleted “as part of a device-replacement program” despite the inspector general requesting such communications.

The director of communications for the Secret Service, Anthony Guglielmi, subsequently dismissed any "insinuation" the agents had "maliciously" deleted the texts.

While some of the information was lost, Guglielmi said that all of the relevant text messages that the committee and inspector general wanted were available and were being turned over.

And I have a bridge I want to sell you

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

Roundandroundwego · 61-69

Did you people notice? Merrick Garland SAYS NO! No way to prosecute Trump I'm. Are you senile, just gaslighting as usual? Whatever! Go back to conservative sleep, Dem,!!!

View 8 more replies »

Roundandroundwego · 61-69

@sunsporter1649 no -. Just talking about what he said today -. Deny. Nobody said nothing, especially not Merrick Garland. Pone me bigger. What are I EVEN talking about? LL ok. Nothing was said. Nothing nothing nothing nothing nothing nothing. Dem.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@Roundandroundwego So you believe anything meritless garland says! Makes one wonder why....

Roundandroundwego · 61-69

@sunsporter1649 whatever
You decide what I believe, then decide it's wrong. You win. Nobody cares about your dying sicko country. Garlicky who? He's fake news. There's no Merrick Garland. There's no Washington DC. Whatever.

TexChik · F

How convenient!

TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP

Does this mean the SS can now be forced to disclose other stuff they’ve seen or overheard, emails and txts. for the past.. let’s say 30 years?
🤔🍿

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Only if it is pertinent to jailing President Trump

TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP

@sunsporter1649 in their pursuit of orange man. they sure are setting some dangerous precedents for themselves down the track when a majority republic congress full of Marjory taylor greens and lauren Boeberts are in charge and on committees.
not an endorsement of tit for tat. but it is what it is...and will be..

wildbill83 · 41-45, M

@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout just "impeach" every lower level democrat before they can run for higher office. If they think they can do it to keep Trump from returning to office, then Republicans can certainly do it to keep democrats from ever getting into office to begin with... 🤔

Roundandroundwego · 61-69

Whatever. Nobody cares what actually happened. Get over it. Trump runs again, so,??

View 1 more replies »

Roundandroundwego · 61-69

@sunsporter1649 no -. We're all aware. It's old news and it didn't change anything. Garland won't prosecute a fellow DemoPublican.
As a leftist I don't really fear the facts like Murkan liars do. Y'all are something else. No making sense anymore! Murka wins the death of the ecosystem! Whatever you want Murka! Nobody can think anymore. You poned this planet Dead! Winners win, the sheeple got eaten -. Finally an end to the life problem!

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@Roundandroundwego Don't bogard that joint

Roundandroundwego · 61-69

@sunsporter1649 whatever! Don't ignore oncoming traffic like if it was politics. Or, whatever! Do.

MistyCee

Should be enough to fight about an "adverse inference" absent proof of bad faith, at least, which I haven't seen yet, and we won't get there with a Congressional hearing.

BizSuitStacy · M

Nothing is ever truly deleted. Anything they can't find is because they are really looking.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

Add a comment...