Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Carla · 61-69, F
But shes lying though...
Or wait...she wasn't cross examined.
And the beast. You know, the beast.
The most urgent thing is she relayed a story that really is inconsequential, but it must be focused on and called out as fake.
Never mind that he welcomed in armed, militant morons to take over the capitol.
Or wait...she wasn't cross examined.
And the beast. You know, the beast.
The most urgent thing is she relayed a story that really is inconsequential, but it must be focused on and called out as fake.
Never mind that he welcomed in armed, militant morons to take over the capitol.
View 24 more replies »
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
FlowersNButterflies · 61-69, FVIP
@LamontCranston What a dumb post. You are saying you are absolutely right and people who don't agree with you are absolutely wrong. You have no credibility.
justanothername · 51-55, M
justanothername · 51-55, M
@Vin53 They do but you always hear the term “he sang like a canary” when one criminal dished up the dirt on his criminal buddies when he got caught.
Vin53 · M
You are right. But only in that saying. Canary in a coal mine was only there to croak when the air was deadly 1,200 ft below the surface.
@justanothername
@justanothername
justanothername · 51-55, M
@Vin53 ;)
Subsumedpat · 36-40, M
Yes have her testify under oath in a courtroom about what she actually saw and actually heard directly, no someone said someone said.
Carla · 61-69, F
@Subsumedpat i would love to also see all of the utterances of " I take the fifth"
Vin53 · M
She WAS under oath and she answered the questions that were asked of her. Truthfully and credibly.
@Subsumedpat @Subsumedpat
@Subsumedpat @Subsumedpat
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Subsumedpat DIRECT testimony. She was in the room. Words from Trump's mouth to her ears. He was 1. Aware supporters were storming the Capitol.
2. Aware they were armed.
3. Instructed the metal detectors to be removed with the assurance they wouldn't hurt him.
He knew about the insurrection, knew there were weapons involved, knew they were coming and condoned all of it. So what are the "non-charges"? These are the easy ones to prove:
OBSTRUCTING AN OFFICIAL PROCEEDING - Trump's efforts to persuade then-Vice President Mike Pence to reject slates of electors.
CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES - The committee submitted the court filing as part of its effort to force Trump adviser John Eastman to hand over documents. The filing said it was likely that Trump and others conspired to defraud the United States, which criminalizes any effort by two or more people to interfere with governmental functions "by deceit, craft or trickery."
And my favorite:
SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY - 18 U.S. Code § 2384
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
2. Aware they were armed.
3. Instructed the metal detectors to be removed with the assurance they wouldn't hurt him.
He knew about the insurrection, knew there were weapons involved, knew they were coming and condoned all of it. So what are the "non-charges"? These are the easy ones to prove:
OBSTRUCTING AN OFFICIAL PROCEEDING - Trump's efforts to persuade then-Vice President Mike Pence to reject slates of electors.
CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES - The committee submitted the court filing as part of its effort to force Trump adviser John Eastman to hand over documents. The filing said it was likely that Trump and others conspired to defraud the United States, which criminalizes any effort by two or more people to interfere with governmental functions "by deceit, craft or trickery."
And my favorite:
SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY - 18 U.S. Code § 2384
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
And yet Merrick Garland doesn't act. We will elect trump because the court cancelled democracy. La de Dem. Dem Dems sure failed big.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Roundandroundwego The hearing isn't even over yet. Not everything is instant karma.
Driver2 · M
It’s already been proven to be a lie
Hey try the Russian hoax again maybe ?
Hey try the Russian hoax again maybe ?
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
LamontCranston · M
She appears to be the new Christine Blasey Ford. 😄