Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

A well regulated militia

That pertains to the National guard. Which regulated and run by the states. Infringement is when the federal government holds them in a federal states when the state calls them into action. Or denying states military weaponry ordered for national guards.

The National guard is a state militia. Its why the commander in chiefs of the national guard is the state governor of the state in which a guard unit is based out of. The right to keep and bare arms in a well regulated militia pertains to states access to arms that are independent of federal government control.

This unfettered marketing of weapons of war to every whack job does not fit the standards of a "well regulated militia" requiring a psychiatric evaluation by the same psychiatrists who are involved in pre law enforcement employment screening is legal and falls in the scope of a "well regulated militia.
Graylight · 51-55, F
It is officially created under Congress's Article 1 Section 8, ability to 'raise and support armies'. All members of the National Guard are also members of the organized militia of the United States as defined by 10 U.S.C. § 246. National Guard units are under the dual control of the state governments and the federal government.

The National Guard is a joint activity of the United States Department of Defense (DoD) composed of reserve components of the United States Army and the United States Air Force: the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard, respectively.

If you're suggesting the general public may be armed by calling themselves part of the National Guard, that'd be incorrect. Little matter. We don't suffer a tidal wave of militia deaths each year. The people killing themselves and each other are the 'good guys.'

Also, the US Constitution is a 250-year-old document. It's never been said to be handed down from on high, to be infallible or to be unchangeable. In fact, the founding fathers were exceedingly clear on its continual evolution and interpretation.
Montanaman · M
@Graylight #RedDawn. It could happen. China. Russia. North Korea. Its a real scenario. Let alone the threat of nuclear attack is as prevalent today as was in the cold war in the 60's. Wake up!
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Montanaman No. No, it can't.
Johnson212 · 61-69, M
If you were well read on the founding documents you would know that your equivication of the national guard being a well regulated militia under the 2nd ammendment was totally off base. Or if you would read the US Supreme Courts explination you would know it is an individual right belonging to the people.
Quetzalcoatlus · 46-50, M
That's probably what they meant but the gun lobby has a nice propaganda machine...
Ozuye502 · 36-40, M
Way off my guy! Way off! Nice liberal interpretation of it though.
Virgo79 · 61-69, M
Glad to hear from a constitution attorney.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
You just made my day a little nicer. Sometimes I just feel like a lone voice in the wilderness among all these gun fetishists who think the Second Amendment means they get to plunk tin cans with AK-47s.
Ozuye502 · 36-40, M
@LordShadowfire plinking tin cans with an AK super fun! Especially a good shaken up soda can! But watermelons is definitely where it’s at! But a well built AK47 is far superior of a weapons platform in comparison to the AR15. Which had to be modified to make the M16&M4. Yes it was designed as a civilian weapon first!
justanothername · 51-55, M
@Ozuye502 The AK47 was designed for rugged durability and ease of use by anyone. It’s the cheapest automatic weapon to mass produce and far more durable than any other gun but not necessarily known for its accuracy.
Designed by Alexander Klashnikov in 1947. The design has remained virtually unchanged to this day.
Ozuye502 · 36-40, M
@justanothername it’s gone through some changes but remains almost unchanged I’d also argue that the 7.62x39 although not as accurate at longer ranges has better stopping power over the 5.56x45 dude to its larger diameter. Because well bigger hole less bad guy. Mr. Klashnikov designed a fantastic piece of hardware. Mr. Stoner did as well I just prefer the AK platform over the AR. Let’s just say the AK is the only thing the commies got right.
I do like the scar though. The manual of arms is very similar to the ak and that 7.62x54 out performs both the 5.56 nato as well as the 7.62x39.
Montanaman · M
Let's just say, we agree to disagree. 😎
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Ferise1 Rich is not prosperous.

https://www.prosperity.com/globe/united-states
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/16-countries-that-are-more-prosperous-than-the-united-states-2016-11-03
https://qz.com/292417/how-the-us-stacks-up-to-the-worlds-most-prosperous-country/
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Ferise1 Doesn't make the US most prosperous. It only shows private business can make multimillionaires.

And whose economic freedom? How are your MickyD's stocks doing? That Microsoft retirement package all set up? These are mega-corporations who don't pay all their taxes, use loopholes to skirt regulation and pass on any and all costs to consumers. In fact, it's a known business model during inflation to complain about the cost of doing business, pass on the burden to consumers and then build in an "inflation profit margin," extra padding under the false heading of inflation costs.

So yes, there are rich corporations out there, but rich and prosperous are not measured in the same way. The average American citizen is not doing as well as he or she should given the wealth of this nation.

 
Post Comment