Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

So if gun control isn’t the solution what is?

Honest question. I’m pro 2nd amendment but this isn’t sustainable. Arming the teachers isn’t going to help. The guy was wearing body armor, even the cops couldn’t stop him from getting in. More money for cops obviously isn’t the solution for the same reason. This isn’t the first time a shooter wore body armor. A guy had a gun and returned fire in buffalo but the shooter wore body armor there too.

So honestly what is to be done?
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
Lets take the thing apart like an intellectual puzzle, not an emotional knee jerk. The constant is the guns, there are simply so many. So thats not changing. So you either stop people wanting to charge ito public places, which is a whole psycho/mental health/social conditioning nightmare: Make every public gathering place a nightmare to access, which turns the nation into a Police state, Or move to some place it doesnt happen. Basically another country.
😷
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@boudinMan I am confused. You say you disagree. then you target exactly the factors that create the individuals osolation and frustration.😷
boudinMan · 61-69, M
@whowasthatmaskedman no, wanting to win doesn't cause lack of discipline... that's a parent's job. i'm not sure what labeling people has to do with winning at all, the same for lack of a father, and social media. perhaps you could argue that it causes isolation, but it's also a parent's job to foster self-esteem in their children so that they can handle losing. it's called sportsmanship.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@boudinMan Now I see where I went wrong.. We have a different definition of sportsmanship.😷
Heartlander · 80-89, M
A return to smaller, neighborhood schools may help. I think we broke that model when we started bussing kids to unfamiliar neighborhoods, to attend school with strangers and teachers that didn't know the parents, etc.

I remember as a teen comparing our smaller town schools to the nearby big city school. As the big city schools got bigger and bigger they became the "blackboard jungle" of the 50s where schools were controlled more by the teen gangs than the teachers. Meanwhile, our smaller small towns remained a community focal point where teachers, parents and students interacted, knew one another and by and large respected one another.

Why is this important? For one, people are less inclined to murder someone they have respectful and familiar relations with. Also it makes it harder for people to slip through the cracks, or become victims of bullies.

We sent our kids to a smaller, private school. All entrances had a school secretary to filter people entering. This was probably adapted following a horrible crime committed there many years earlier, where a kidnapper gained access by disguising herself as a nurse who was there to fetch a child whose mother had been in an accident and was at the hospital seriously injured. It was a kidnapping and after the parents paid a ransom it was discovered that the child had been murdered within minutes after the abduction. It serves as an awful reminder that there are people on this earth that will cold bloodly murder a child for reasons that normal people may never understand, and there always has to be a layer of protection to guard our children, regardless of how secure we feel.

Finally, schools have to focus on the C-minus and D students as much as or even more than they do on the A+ students. For the few dozen shining stars, there are many more non-cheer leaders, non-jocks, and non gifted students who are potential shining stars waiting to bloom, or waiting to discover their passion. Schools have to focus on every single student. A few years ago at one of the homecomings they ID's a former student from the 50s who had substantial achievements in the 50 years following graduation. In high-school though he was a marginal student that always sat in the last row and out of sight, had difficulty paying attention, etc.
Heartlander · 80-89, M
@SW-User

One thing all the school shootings have in common:

The shooters are always males.
SW-User
@Heartlander and they always have guns obtained usually from their own home
Carazaa · F
@Heartlander Agree!🙏
Montanaman · M
1. Why wasn’t that entry door secured at that school in Uvalde?

2. Why wasn’t there armed staff (a legal option in Texas) or at the very least, an armed Resource Officer?

EVERY school in the US must have secured, controlled-entry doors and armed good guys.
Period!

That’s how you stop school shootings.
It works every time it has been tried.

Parents: check out your kid’s school:

Entry doors not secured?
Take them out of school!

No armed Resource Officer or Staff?
Take them out of school!
NoahB · 26-30, M
@Montanaman the cops (who are very well funded, armed, and experienced) engaged with the shooter before They got in. What is a resource officer with a gun going to do that the cops couldn’t?
Montanaman · M
@NoahB stop him from the inside. Double tap center mass. Body armor or not, it's gonna take him down.
NoahB · 26-30, M
@Montanaman the shooter crashed his car and fought his way in. Cops did shoot at him but he was heavily armed and armored. Think your way over simplifying how fire fights work
Elessar · 26-30, M
Ah "let's fund a private small army with everybody's taxes for any and every school in the country, because regulating guns like the rest of the civilized world would be too woke"
Heartlander · 80-89, M
Elessar · 26-30, M
@Heartlander Yet drug users are still prosecuted, and soon also abortionists. Had this guy somehow managed to kill 20+ fetuses sparing the mother's rest assured 2A would've been overturned with the full support of the GOP yesterday lol

Anyway, when you restrict gun access it'll require a lot more effort (and money) getting one, the experience of the rest of the world (and not just Australia) confirms it. You can argue as much as you want, but it is what it is. It's the republican and NRA hands that are soaked in blood right now, not mine.

This message was deleted by its author.
Anon066 · 31-35, M
since this is a good faith questions i'll give a thorough answer.

first of all the most important thing is keeping it in perspective. any incident that leaves innocent people dead is a tragedy, and it's especially sad when children are involved, but emotional knee jerk reactions aren't helpful. as of parkland the odds of dying in a school shooting were 1 in 614 million. kids are more likely to die not only in an accident on the way to school, but also in an accident or from an illness contracted in interscholastic sports. while these events are horrific they're extremely rare.

it's disgusting to me that everybody attempting to politicize tragedies like this don't think of the children even a tiny bit, often while accusing the others of not caring about the children. kids dying in a school shooting is a horrible tragedy, but what's much worse is adults terrifying kids over an event they'll almost certainly never have to deal with. children are very impressionable and take things to heart very easily, making them believe school is a dangerous place is absolutely abhorrent.

second, we need to realize that just like every other horrific act people commit there is no way to completely stop it, and that "doing something" is not inherently superior to doing nothing. it's very common to hear the emotionally manipulative "kids are dying and you don't care because you're doing nothing," but that's an incredibly childish way to look at things. every action has a reaction, action that isn't helpful isn't better than no action at all. when somebody says the inaction needs to stop and we need to do something ask them what. then ask them how it'd help. you'll almost certainly find they don't know, they just think something needs to be done. these people act as if they have moral superiority, but they're really just emotional children.

third, we need to stop giving the shooters attention. somebody else made a post on this earlier so i'm not gonna go deep into it, but a lot of mass shooters do it because they want to make a name for themselves. focusing on the victims rather than the shooter in media coverage could help that.

fourth, we need to identify the problem. people keep citing the "27 school shootings already this year" but i've yet to see a single person discuss what caused most of them. if you go through the list of shootings most line up with overall gun crime statistics, fights in high crime areas. the school shooting that everybody thinks of where a crazy kid kills a bunch of people at random are incredibly rare (even in the context of already incredibly rare events), most shootings that happen at school share the root cause with the majority of violent crime. focusing on the anomalies that are incredibly difficult to stop is ignoring most of the problem.

as far as actual actions, i think it's contextual. mental health needs to be addressed, lack of social cohesion needs to be addressed, the consistent failure of law enforcement to deal with known threats needs to be addressed. inner city schools often already have metal detectors, but a large portion of school shootings don't happen inside the school. inner city schools also usually have police presence or armed guards, both of which can help. arming teachers is scoffed at but it's actually very effective, but the teachers need to be willing to go through the training.

overall the "kids are dying we need more gun control" is possibly the stupidest take one could have on the topic. most of the areas with the most gun violence already have strict gun laws. the vast majority of gun violence is committed with illegal guns, and when it is committed with a legal gun it's pretty silly to think somebody that is willing to shoot children wouldn't be willing to get an illegal gun if denied legal access. multiple mass shooters have stated they chose their target based on strict gun laws and gun free zones because they knew they'd have a higher likelihood of success.

in the end we need to stop politicizing these tragedies and look for actual proven solutions. whining about "doing something" and advocating completely infeasible things like gun bans doesn't help anyone, especially not children.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
It's not that giving guns to good guys don't work, it's the training, most people don't train for active combat scenarios. They have to have training to fundamentally practice day in and day out until they know the layout of the school or place by hearing alone. What most people think of as training is essentially daycare and NOT training at all. You've got multiple issues to worry about with training, you need to train fight or flight responses, you need to train for any threatening stimuli, SERE training is good (survive/evade/resist/escape,) you need to desensitize yourself, you need good target practice.

All of that goes into training and let's be honest, unless it was specialized security, they're not going to be trained right because the average person doesn't do that. It's like with bush crafting or survival wilderness training, most don't have the skills because most don't have that mindset but you kind of need that mindset to have successful gun training for active shooter scenarios.

I'm not saying it's a solution but my solution would be to actively train "good" people for that situation but they're not willing to do it. Believe it or not, I've worked in govt agencies but not in a higher tier level job, let me tell you the training of anything no matter if it's dishwashing, food service or whatever... even small menial tasks are not trained properly at all. The management for anything in govt is SO incompetent that if people were to find out how these agencies are actually managed, they would be scared. Even hospitals, I've worked in hospitals where I wouldn't be surprised if a person's surgery was botched because of poor management and other things.

If people only knew.

So that's just my thoughts, it's not that giving guns to good guys doesn't work but there's a lot to take into consideration, you have to have good training and to make it into something that is repetitive so the person trains for those things. You can't just get a certification, hit some targets and then have a gun, think you're going to take someone out.
NoahB · 26-30, M
@CopperCicada yeah. I think the imagination of a lot of people has been very stunted. There are at least 100 replies in this thread alone of the same four unworkable solutions to this problem from my pro 2ndAM peers.

1) give the cops more money. (Silly because they are already absurdly well funded)/implant mercenaries to patrol schools (insane)

2) take away all gun control laws (really dumb because this incident happened in Texas. A state with practically zero gun control laws)

3) arm and train teachers (ridiculous because what could teachers do that cops couldn’t?)

4) increase incarceration sentences for EVERYONE who’s ever committed a crime. (Ridiculous. Most people who do mass shooting pass background checks anyway)
This message was deleted by its author.
NoahB · 26-30, M
@CopperCicada yeah and that’s a fair perspective.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Heartlander · 80-89, M
@Montanaman

While this is a super tragic event that will captivate the political squabbling for a few weeks, it's also worth mentioning that ...

About 275 +/- Americans die daily from drug overdose and rarely do politicians or the media give it much attention.

About 20 +/- People are murdered in Chicago alone each and every week, with comparable numbers in many big American cities and it only seems to gain attention near election times. Add all the big cities together and it's a slaughter.

Attention to the school shootings seems to be more about political opportunity than about the tragedies themselves. Like why do some tragedies become headlines while tragedies with far greater loss of life escape with a shrug of the shoulders?
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Heartlander No Heartlander.... we can't have a reasonable discussion because people like yourself keep bringing up claims that make no sense and pretend that they are real because the 2nd amendement needs to be protected at all cost. Even with ridiculous arguments. That's why a real discussion can't take place.

You can blame it on the politicians as much as you want... but what is really going on is that a segment of the population is unable to do some self reflection. They are unable too, because they value themselves so highly that their choices and political opinions are just unable to have real life consequences. So every time toppics like this come up, it ends up with "what about?", "blame the other" and arguments that are down right shortsighted and ridiculous.

Also... America has been waging a war on drugs for how many years now? Pretending that this hasn't been adressed by several administrations is kinda ridiculous. At best you can call it apathy because all these measures that were taken didn't really seem to have worked out so well.
Heartlander · 80-89, M
@Kwek00

The wars on drugs had much the same effects as our war on alcohol. They created and swelled a permanent criminal class that rules much of America. And I would imagine for the same reasons.

The war on firearms is going that same direction.

On reflection, it seems like we can't fairly discuss any of America's ills because politicians and their media pals control the talking points.

For a glimpse at how control of the talking points is so hoarded by leftist, notice how fast they are trying to turn Elon Musk into a super villain. Geez, when the left turns a planet-saving maker of EVs into a villain it's pretty obvious where that 3rd rail is :)
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Heartlander
[quote]The war on firearms is going that same direction.[/quote]

Strange that this doesn't happen in the rest of the developed nations... kinda wonders what makes America so "special" then.

Oh more what aboutisms and blaming forces outside our tribe... who would have thought we had to deal with that when it comes to this toppic.
Heartlander · 80-89, M
Interesting details about Ramos emerging.

Mom with a drug problem. Police called frequently to the house.
At some point he moved in with his grandmother. The one he murdered.
Teased and bullied at school over speech impediment, stopped attending.
Had difficulty interacting with girls.
He may have been a cutter.
One of his friends said that they's drive around and shoot people at random with a BB gun and egg other cars.

A sad situation all around. There is far more to all this killing than gun control. Was there no safe haven for the kid to get validated and find refuge? Church groups? Boy Scouts? School/youth clubs? etc. Otherwise troubled kids will eventually find one another or just let the resentment ferment until it explodes.
Heartlander · 80-89, M
@Kwek00 Our kids went to a great Montessori schools for their early years. One was part of a small university and the other fairly well canceled. It was the choices we had that Democrats fight tooth and nail agains and public school boards tend to poo-poo with their refusal to admit that Maria Montessori had far better insights into the education of young children than the teachers' unions.

School Choice would give parents who may be concerned about school security the freedom to find a more secure school.
NoahB · 26-30, M
@Heartlander if the solution is school choice than surely you acknowledge that some schools will not have the same level of security as others. So the shooters will just keep going for the softer targets. This changes nothing. Besides the school that just got shot up had a built in police department. Doesn't get much more secure than that
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Heartlander I also don't see any reason how this would help the issue? Like, is there any data on this... at all. Or is this just you remembering the good old days, in a diffrent time period, in a diffrent society and then pretending that template for some reason still works?
Ozuye502 · 36-40, M
Put in a rapid response force on school grounds when school is in session. Make it a death sentence to attack a school. Hardened targets utilizing veterans and law enforcement training is already there keeping their skills sharp is necessary and cheaper than training a guy with minimal firearm training. As far as body armor is concerned steel core m855 (green tip) can go through most body armor*
Ozuye502 · 36-40, M
@NoahB not surprised honestly!
NoahB · 26-30, M
Yeah. You gotta be pretty sick in the head to do something like this@Ozuye502
@Ozuye502 Schools are already militarized enough, adding more armed guards won’t help.
Ozuye502 · 36-40, M
@LeopoldBloom you know most scools have 1 maybe 2 armed officers who are cops mostly retired not in the best physical shape. + they have zero constitutional duty to act or protect. Utilizing private services for this would eliminate that. Im also all for having armed staff custodians administrators and teachers. Hardened targets do not have mass shootings when was the last time Fort Knox or Quantico had one? Never because they would turned into Swiss cheese before they made it inside the building. Hardened targets dont get hit. Gun control doesn't work because it only makes it harder for law abiding citizens to gain the tools of self defense criminals will get firearms regardless of the laws.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Ozuye502 If one of the biggest militairy powers in the world, can be stopped by people that believe Red Dawn is the best movie ever and needs to be re-enacted at some point... I think that's a bit delusional.

[quote]Just ask Ukraine how well gun control worked out for them. Or the jews of Europe in the 1940s. Or anyone living under a tyrant.[/quote]

If you think the Jews with a bunch of weapons could have stopped the entire German apparatus... you a bit delusional. Also, Ukraine didn't have guns, and they are still there... isn't that an example that works against you?
Ozuye502 · 36-40, M
@Kwek00 you do realize that unlike our politicians our military understands that its oath of service is NOT to the gooberment sorry government. Hence the whole "threats both foreign and domestic" part.
You are right Ukraine didn’t have guns but at the start of the war Ukrainian government was handing them out like candy on Halloween to anybody willing to take up arms against an invading force. Well the framers kinda skip that step.
The Jews of 1940s Germany may or may not have won but could have put up a good fight. See your missing the asymmetrical warfare component of this hypothetical would work. See theres a reason why the attack on pearl harbor wasn't followed up by a land invasion. Because they knew they would be out gunned by the civilian population.
Perfect example of asymmetrical warfare is the wars in Afghanistan they are bloody and costly but they are effective involves gorllia war tactics. So yes they are effective even against the biggest bad ass on the block.
When the Obama administration ran the red vs blue simulation in a war against the American population 125 times theres only one scenario that the government actually came out successful. That was getting the un involved and would have ened up with charges of treason while retaining 100% of all current personnel. So yes the American population armed as it is would win in a war against the government. Its not delusional its factual.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Ozuye502
Man, if some foreign power feels confident enough to invade a country with a militairy power comparible to the US. Your militia, won't make much of a dent. If the own governement turns authoritarian, they need the militairy to do so. Authoritarian governements need to have support from the militairy or their dictatorial ideas will never be put into practise. The militairy might not take their oath to the governement, it takes it oath to the state and it's citizens. But at the end of the day, that doesn't create a safe zone where the militairy can't back up an authoritarian regime. So if the enemy is foreign of domestic, espescially in the case of the United States, your normal people with guns would largely be a big joke.

[quote]You are right Ukraine didn’t have guns but at the start of the war Ukrainian government was handing them out like candy on Halloween to anybody willing to take up arms against an invading force. Well the framers kinda skip that step.[/quote]

🤷‍♂️ I'm pretty sure the framers also didn't understand how dumb this 2nd amendment thing would be after years of rechewing and reframing. I'm pretty sure if these people looked at the societal cost of "skipping the step", they would gladly not skip it in the future.

[quote]The Jews of 1940s Germany may or may not have won but could have put up a good fight. See your missing the asymmetrical warfare component of this hypothetical would work. See theres a reason why the attack on pearl harbor wasn't followed up by a land invasion. Because they knew they would be out gunned by the civilian population.[/quote]

Pearl Harbor was a militairy base. Militairy bases are bound to be armed you don't need to "make up" and fantasize about armed civilians here. 🤦‍♂️ And the Japanese apperently didn't have the resources to deal with that. But does it matter? The main objective was to destroy the fleet... which they did. You are just making stuff up as we go along here. And this idea that the Jewis population could just put up a fight, and this would be better for your argument. Seems a bit ridiculous considering that the likelihood of success is just... well, horendously bad. A bit like guerrilla warfare that isn't backed up by a large percentage of the poppulation. But even then, it's ridiculous to rationalise the societal cost that comes with the pro-gun argument with an ineffecient means of defense [i](that during non-conflict times, does more damadge then most conflicts).
[/i]
[quote]When the Obama administration ran the red vs blue simulation in a war against the American population [...]
[/quote]

Source desperatly needed here.
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
What do you mean "if gun control isn't the solution"? You guys have never tried it on a national scale.
Diaermatty · 56-60, M
@Thevy29 hy would I give up my gun so some one like the guy who shot school can or government can kill controll u
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
Gun control is the solution. Maybe after you've had a mass shooting in Congress , that fact might actually dawn on those opposed to it.
Unless a person is dressed as this
There are ways to take a person down regardless.
NoahB · 26-30, M
@WhisperingAngel Yes I am as well. But being a member of a group that is pro 2nd amendment doesn't magically make you an expert marksman
@NoahB That takes skill and practice and beibg taught well.
NoahB · 26-30, M
@WhisperingAngel People with skill and practice (the police) showed up before the gunman entered the school and it didn't stop the gunman. Thats the reality of the situation. So your oversimplifying the situation right off the bat
Tres13 · 51-55, M
Open carry like the old days
TheRascallyOne · 31-35, M
@Montanaman yes in Texas
Montanaman · M
@TheRascallyOne as far as I know, almost every state is 21.
TheRascallyOne · 31-35, M
@Montanaman I've only lived in Texas
nedkelly · 61-69, M
Mass shootings is terrible and makes everyone jump up and down in disgust, what is the murder rate by guns in the USA
NoahB · 26-30, M
Paladin · 56-60, M
@nedkelly The better question is how many executed children do we find acceptable. We need to find a solution, and as rapidly as possible. Because what we've been doing is not working. I don't know the solution, but sitting around and pointing fingers at the other team doesn't seem to help. Just as I think gun grabbing won't help, not this late in the game.
But right now, both sides are so entrenched in their respective positions that even discussion on the topic doesn't seem possible.
SW-User
Sadly, nothing. Nothing will fix it. It will continue. There is no way in hell we can ever get rid of [b]all[/b] guns. And we can't predict who will do this or when this will happen. [i]The nation is sick, mentally and emotionally.[/i] Sodom and Gomorrah on a larger scale. So the smart thing is to brace up! Anything else is delusion.
SW-User
@Heartlander Right. And just how do you propose to diagnose and keep track of all those [b]millions[/b] of children in those situations and try to stymie it. You won't even know what homes they are in or how they have been raised. Most of these things happen in hidden situations. No way in hell that is going to happen. You're deluding yourself. Unless you're going to go to every single home in the US and start monitoring them? LOL.
Heartlander · 80-89, M
@SW-User Good question. Maybe "Hillbilly Energy" should be required reading for all adults. What's the secret ingredient that lets a kid who grows up in what looks to be a dysfunctional household and community yet come out OK?

So are you suggesting that the police go into every single home and confiscate any and all firearms? Attempts to purging America's firearms will be as successful as abolition. Even as the law of the land it accomplished little more than create and grow a permanent criminal class.
SW-User
@Heartlander I'm not suggesting nothing!
You are the one who mentioned, I was only replying to you, as a, yeah not gonna happen thing..

I stand by my original comments.
[quote]
Sadly, nothing. Nothing will fix it. It will continue. There is no way in hell we can ever get rid of all guns. And we can't predict who will do this or when this will happen. The nation is sick, mentally and emotionally. Sodom and Gomorrah on a larger scale. So the smart thing is to brace up! Anything else is delusion.[/quote]
Instead of banning guns I think we should ban the gun fetishists from living and declare the NRA a terrorist organization.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
Gun control is the answer. Americans picked this, and they can stop whining over the uptick in the body count.
Mindful · 56-60, F
Ethics class, law class. You don’t follow, you don’t get to participate in society.
Tastyfrzz · 61-69, M
Republicans want more kids around for target practice. They're tired of clay pigeons. I really think that if you want the definition of someone that is anti-God don't think of satanists or atheists, it's Republicans. They are pure evil. The party of Trump. Just ish, icky...
Ozuye502 · 36-40, M
@Tastyfrzz actually it’s demorats who love this stuff it was politicized before the victim’s family’s were informed. And it’s demorats who will refuse to put appropriate security measures in place
Figure out the root causes and deal with those. We know not everybody who owns a gun goes out to murder people so restricting access isn't going to solve the problem if we don't deal with the root cause. It might prevent a very small percentage but it will continue to happen.
Heartlander · 80-89, M
@midnightrose

One thing all the school shootings have in common is that it's always a male shooter.
Elessar · 26-30, M
Thoughts and prayers, of course!
KiwiBird · 36-40, F
Shut the elementary schools.
Home Schooling Mandatory
Solves Unemployment to boot.
@KiwiBird Then the parents would have immediate and unrestricted access to their own children to abuse and indoctrinate them with anything. I know several teachers that said the home schooling for just one year of covid lockdowns brainwashed some children And they had to spend the next school year undoing the damage. I also knew kids growing up that loved school because it was a chance to get away from being molested at home.
Shutting down schools sounds good but that is exactly what authoritarians want. And uneducated population is a fearful population that is controlled by emotions due to not being taught the tools to regulate those emotions. Which leads to easier manipulation and ultimately violence. In the end parents cant be trusted with their own children. For supposedly the most precious people children are less regulated that OTC cough syrup. Which shows that America does not care about children at all since literally everything else is a higher priority.
KiwiBird · 36-40, F
@canusernamebemyusername I apologise. I did not think anyone would take my reply seriously.

However saying that....teachers can indoctrinate the kids as well....in greater numbers. The molestation you talk about would still occur outside of school hours.
gdon39 · 41-45, M
This is such a conundrum and the answer(s) are as likely to gain traction as easily as getting politicians to work for the greater good of the nation rather than all of the bipartisan nonsense that is happening now.

I’ve long said that guns aren’t the issue, ammunition is. Make ammunition cost prohibitive and I mean really expensive. Criminals are still going to find access to them through crime.

This is likely to be the most ridiculous thing you will read today.
SW-User
The USA have gun control ???

Seems to work well in many other countries
This message was deleted by its author.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@SW-User Wow... sounds like shithole country to me... Can I migrate?
This message was deleted by its author.
Bang5luts · M
Removing guns out of law abiding citizens hands and leaving the criminals the only people armed isn't a good idea. Js government entities included
TheRascallyOne · 31-35, M
Is getting rid of criminals
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@TheRascallyOne You already have a death sentence. Not to mention that all these punishments come AFTER the fact. It's so crazy to me, that people that believe in stronger punishment, rarely think about measures that have preventive benefits. No matter how hard you punish people AFTER the facts, there will always be a moment where the facts take place.
TheRascallyOne · 31-35, M
@Kwek00 That's what I propose making a blender and putting the worst people we have into the blender
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@TheRascallyOne The "worst" people? LOL ... How naieve.

Every year, there are court cases of normal people that never did anything wrong. That live a "normal" life, but at some point get emotional. For all kinds of things. They loose their job, their partner cheated on them, someone did something cruel to them, ... you name it. Any reason that gives someone a hard feeling of "injustice" or angers people or creates a feeling of revenge... something that makes them so emo that ratio is out of the door. And in that moment of extreme emotional outburst, commit a terrible crime.

And in court, people understand this. People understand that sometimes human beings can just snap. They aren't evil, they aren't inherrently bad, these aren't "the worst" people. But they got extremely angry or depressed over something, and in that period commited a serious crime. In certain cases this emotional outburst is taking into account, exactly because it lowers the control a person has over themselves. It's a moment of temporarily insanity, or at least a moment where rational thought just isn't there and thus people can't make calculated reasonable choices.

Courts recognise this, psychologists recognise this, ... but when it comes to a segment of the population this thing that is reconised by people that deal with these situation and study them, doesn't excist. This segment lives in this fantasy world that you can also find inside the writings of early liberal writers. Where the idea is that all people are rational and make rational descisions all the time. And in this fantasy world, the only people that can do wrong are those that are inherrently bad people because it can't be anything else? Because people are reasonable all the time... so the only people that can do wrong are those that are "inherently" evil, because they are evil in their reasoning. And in that world, everyone can have a gun because only the inherently evil people will be a danger. That good people can just snap just can't be... because everyone is reasonable all the time. But yeah... it's a fantasy. Snap out of it.
Gusman · 61-69, M
Looks like all schools need to be fortified. Starting at the gate, which needs to be some distance from the school building.
Have every parent use an entrance card to activate the gate.
Each child to be admitted individually.
Armed guards at every school.
This sounds really scary but extreme measures need to be taken.
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
Education: if we are doing to have this right, we need to teach about it in schools. Safety, proper care, how to secure them, and so on. This does not solve everything, but it's one step that is important.

By recognizing the right, we deflate some of the "rebel culture" that drives some gun ownership while providing tools and information to serious owners.

By making it a school subject, it also steals some of the "cool factor". Demonstrating the weapons as tools and not toys.

Ultimately, we need to shift cultural perception of guns. Guns are not the tools of tough and manly people. They are tools of the weak and cowardly. That shift alone would change A LOT.

We would still need to take serious efforts on mental health. I feel that is a given and it's talked about every time but then we don't do anything about it.


There's no "silver bullet" for solving gun violence. There are multiple cultural and health issues to tackle. We can actually tackle them without changing anyone's access to or rights to the weapons. But it's a long, challenging road.
Montanaman · M
Thank you for posting this question. We need to navigate the rough waters ahead after the tragedy today. Maybe those in power will raise their white flags and lower the walls to save our children. 😞💔❤️🤗🙏
Human1000 · M
Half of Americans are totally batshit gun nuts. Nothing can help.
SW-User
@Human1000 absolutely!!
This message was deleted by its author.
IWasCallingYaLarry · 26-30, M
The opposite. Zero gun restrictions so everyone can protect themselves.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
NoahB · 26-30, M
@IWasCallingYaLarry Will you relax? I'm pro second amendment but "no gun control" is obviously not a solution when this happened in a state with practically no gun control. Also cars are regulated. You need a license, registration, and to pay insurance to operate one. Your answer is lazy.
IWasCallingYaLarry · 26-30, M
@NoahB Yes, I know all that. I have a rifle, not a pistol. But for some reason, there exist people who act like background checks and everything don't exist. Yeah, the people who don't anything about guns say that. And for some reason, my Ruger 22 with a pistol grip is considered an assault weapon in their eyes. Makes no damn sense. And no, it's not a lazy argument. It's me saying that you can make anything a weapon. About cars, yes you're right. But guess what? For a gun, you need a background check and to fill out a form. It takes like a half hour to an hour before you get the gun and walk out the store with it.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
Here's a solution-. Stop caring about people. The next shooting is nobody. No sympathy. It's natural when you have guns. Relax.
NoahB · 26-30, M
@Changeisgonnacome stop caring... about... kids getting shot...?
Stop criminalizing those who use guns to defend themselves and others.
Diaermatty · 56-60, M
Start killing these kind of people head shot
NoahB · 26-30, M
@Diaermatty why does everyone think this is easy to do? That level of marksman ship is rare even among hardened soldiers
SW-User
[b][u]Gun control is the only solution! [/u][/b]
MonaReeves86 · 36-40, F
Stopping groups for organising shootings just to get gun control
Lilnonames · F
All kids see is killing Iand hating and fighting its on almost every movie, it's in real life video games are killing and fighting. The news is always bad news. Hate is all they see. School bullying and so forth. Lock downs masks all death. It's how they are being brought up in an evil world
NoahB · 26-30, M
@Lilnonames there are plenty of kids who grow up in this world who don’t go on mass shooting sprees
Lilnonames · F
@NoahB very true and there are many countries that don't start wars.
Tres13 · 51-55, M
There’s always a bad apple @NoahB
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Carazaa · F
@LeopoldBloom America has sold their soul in the name of "freedom". They worship freedom more than God, and love their guns more than their own kids.
This message was deleted by its author.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
@CopperCicada teachers need to stop enabling idiots and stop trying to teach the children of rednecks.
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by its author.
Heartlander · 80-89, M
@MarmeeMarch Prison is where Class I felons are turned into Class A felons, or get raped if they don't voluntarily cooperate.
This message was deleted by its author.

 
Post Comment