Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Graylight · 51-55, F
And?
Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson's production company is responsible for some famous films. Chip and Joanna Gaines built an empire together. And nowhere was the illuminati or conspiracy team of nefarious dealings.
Science is numbers. Data. Fact. You can believe the lazy, idiotic lie that science somehow serves the supreme power of government (always the other side's interests though, right?), but this data is available the world over, and no conspiracy is that strong.
I swear to God, conspiracy theories are the paint-by-numbers realities of people who simply don't want to think for themselves.
Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson's production company is responsible for some famous films. Chip and Joanna Gaines built an empire together. And nowhere was the illuminati or conspiracy team of nefarious dealings.
Science is numbers. Data. Fact. You can believe the lazy, idiotic lie that science somehow serves the supreme power of government (always the other side's interests though, right?), but this data is available the world over, and no conspiracy is that strong.
I swear to God, conspiracy theories are the paint-by-numbers realities of people who simply don't want to think for themselves.
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
View 9 more replies »
independentone · M
@MrBrownstone Ok, well you have a good day, it's that time of day, I have to head off to work. Sadly some of us have to be productive in this country so the welfare rats who refuse to work, can collect their checks.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@independentone I need to hear more of your work. "Most conservatives... make up stuff." Can we test your ideas as a Generality Theorist?
For info, please complete the following sentence beginnings:
- "Most democrats are...
- "Most Christians are...
- "Most Muslims are...
For info, please complete the following sentence beginnings:
- "Most democrats are...
- "Most Christians are...
- "Most Muslims are...
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@independentone I will make up something about you since we don’t need evidence
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
Yes, everyone knows that FDA doesn’t do any drug testing, because the trials need to be complete before anyone applies for approval, whether full or emergency.
Goddamn, people don’t pay attention.
Goddamn, people don’t pay attention.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@WalterF Bill’s referring to the well-understood connection between mortality rates and birth rates, but don’t let that stop you from bouncing from conspiracy to conspiracy.
Btw, NIH doesn’t test drugs for FDA approval either.
Btw, NIH doesn’t test drugs for FDA approval either.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul So you think Gates should be every American lad's model of manly virtue and selfless success? In the same league as A. Fauci and Mr Schwab, with his personally designed new humanity (Human 2.0, according to the 110-page document just published by the British Government)?
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@WalterF Typical Amerifat zoomer could do worse for a role model tbh.
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
WalterF · 70-79, M
@DunningKruger And I thought we could be friends. Oh well
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
@WalterF Yeah, I’m not going to lose any sleep about it, either.
GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M
And her work at NIH has nothing to do with the approval of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine
Another non story
Another non story
WalterF · 70-79, M
@GJOFJ3 But I am a little concerned about your claim to inside insight into this lady.
Imagine:
-she is the wife of the most powerful medical influencer in the land
- she knows his programme and presumably supports it 100%
-she certainly has the full respect of all her colleagues, including her superiors
- her voice is surely listened to by all (it's no doubt in their professional interest to do as she suggests)
- with a phone call or an internal memo or a one-to-one meeting with the top management, saying "Antony says we must...," she could get any message across, and make sure it is implemented...
AND YET SHE NEVER USED ANY OF THAT POWER TO GET THIS APPROVAL DONE?
Are you sure your insights are realistic? This doesn't sound like a conspiracy theory to me - it's just a matter of understanding what power, influence, and the promise of additional funding can do
Imagine:
-she is the wife of the most powerful medical influencer in the land
- she knows his programme and presumably supports it 100%
-she certainly has the full respect of all her colleagues, including her superiors
- her voice is surely listened to by all (it's no doubt in their professional interest to do as she suggests)
- with a phone call or an internal memo or a one-to-one meeting with the top management, saying "Antony says we must...," she could get any message across, and make sure it is implemented...
AND YET SHE NEVER USED ANY OF THAT POWER TO GET THIS APPROVAL DONE?
Are you sure your insights are realistic? This doesn't sound like a conspiracy theory to me - it's just a matter of understanding what power, influence, and the promise of additional funding can do
