Top | Newest First | Oldest First
tallpowerhouseblonde · 31-35, F
Russia cannot even beat Ukraine.N.A.T.O. would piss all over Russia.The Russian military is incompetent.
Nimbus · M
@tallpowerhouseblonde Exactly! :)
4meAndyou · F
Nato can't find their rear ends with both hands. Right now they don't even have a plan for moving refugees out of Poland. They are a pretty useless bunch.
BlackNo1 · 26-30, M
Based on the performance seen so far by Russian forces in Ukraine - NATO.
Plus, Russia’s pot to fund war is dwindling fast, whilst NATO countries are actually increasing spend on their military capabilities.
The concern is, if Russia were ever on the back-foot, they’ve been fairly vocal about their willingness to use nuclear arms. Maybe a bluff, but not one anyone is willing to call.
Plus, Russia’s pot to fund war is dwindling fast, whilst NATO countries are actually increasing spend on their military capabilities.
The concern is, if Russia were ever on the back-foot, they’ve been fairly vocal about their willingness to use nuclear arms. Maybe a bluff, but not one anyone is willing to call.
Strawberrry · F
russia has lost more soldiers in one month in ukraine then in 9 years in afghanistan...
the russian war machine was greatly overrated...
the russian war machine was greatly overrated...
Nimbus · M
@Strawberrry 👍
checkoutanytime · M
Im not interested in knowing this result.
Nimbus · M
smiler2012 · 56-60
{@nimbus] it is one of those cases nimby you try not to ever contemplate will ever happen. i think leaders of both sides realise this that any conflict between east and west there will be no winner only an unhabitable planet for decades . so try not too miscalculate when there is an conflict of interests between east and west
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
China... You think they arent waiting on the sidelines, once the dust settles and the winner picks over whats left of their Country, China steps up and tells them how its going to be starting tomorrow. And whos to say thats a bad thing?😷
Nimbus · M
@whowasthatmaskedman That's a point!
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
NATO...not even close
Nimbus · M
Zaphod42 · 46-50, M
Considering the US is in NATO, and the US military alone could defeat both Russia and China combined in a conventional war, that’s an easy choice. And given that the Russian military seem to have deteriorated to that of a nearly broke third world nation… 🤷♂️
smiler2012 · 56-60
@Nimbus it is like asking nimby who is the best football team liverpool or manchester united . you will get conflicting opinions on the question
Nimbus · M
@smiler2012 Yes and then it comes down to class where United romp ahead 😆
smiler2012 · 56-60
@Nimbus 😆 yes it shows in league form and position nimby .😆 i say no more nimby it rather speaks for itself
istillhaveanameitsrick · 56-60, M
In a purely conventional war NATO would win, assuming all members stuck together. If it goes nuclear China wins because we will annihilate each other.
Elessar · 26-30, M
@istillhaveanameitsrick In such a scenario I'm pretty sure China wouldn't be spared either
Nimbus · M
@istillhaveanameitsrick True.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
Russia
View 3 more replies »
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@Dlrannie Oh I don’t know about that.
Dlrannie · 31-35, F
@cherokeepatti Perhaps you should have done some research before making the statement you did 🙂
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@Dlrannie Perhaps you better do some research.
senghenydd · M
NATO would win God save the right.
Nimbus · M
@senghenydd Right on!
TheSirfurryanimalWales · 61-69, M
Which sport are we talking about?
Nimbus · M
@TheSirfurryanimalWales Politics.
benJohnson99 · 18-21, M
war is not game 😩
senghenydd · M
@benJohnson99 I agree it's not a game it's "Bloody Serious"