PayPal and their "mistake"
PayPal is currently being widely criticized for saying that users could have to pay $2,500 in damages for "sending, posting, or the publication of any messages, content, or materials" that promote "misinformation."
There are a number of issues with such a policy, but the most fundamental ones are that it is contrary to free speech, and can never be consistently enforced. We know that the only kind of "misinformation" that would be of interest to them would be information that doesn't align with their views, or is objectionable to them in some way.
What PayPal clearly didn't understand is that many people had the sense to read and subsequently disagree with their updated ToS, and now they are facing the consequences of their insanity and hatefulness.
They have since said that this was a mistake, which absolutely no one believes.
There are a number of issues with such a policy, but the most fundamental ones are that it is contrary to free speech, and can never be consistently enforced. We know that the only kind of "misinformation" that would be of interest to them would be information that doesn't align with their views, or is objectionable to them in some way.
What PayPal clearly didn't understand is that many people had the sense to read and subsequently disagree with their updated ToS, and now they are facing the consequences of their insanity and hatefulness.
They have since said that this was a mistake, which absolutely no one believes.