An article from the Irish Times about the 'biological clock' The more I think about it, the...

Health & Self-Care > Health & Well-being

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

An article from the Irish Times about the 'biological clock'

The more I think about it, the more the ‘biological clock’ deadline annoys me When it comes to fertility, it is not a level playing field I’ve been hearing a lot of the phrase “geriatric pregnancy” lately. Curiously, I never hear it in my hospital...

This is a truncated preview of the original post. Press here to view the full post.

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

yeronlyman · 51-55, M

We can have an opinion, but biology is biology and we’re “victims” to it whether we like it or not

Coralmist · 41-45, F

@yeronlyman The last few women I've seen pregnant were 39, 40 and 43 and all were fine. It's just there CAN be more risk after 35, but doesn't mean there will be.

yeronlyman · 51-55, M

@Coralmist of course and here the average prima gravida is significantly older than years ago

birth risk is exponential after age about 30-35.

Add a comment...