Top | Newest First | Oldest First
helenS · 36-40, F
Yepp. You are right. The globalist elites exclude you from actively participating in scientific progress. We would have so many excellent "How Einstein was Wrong" articles in Physical Reviews without the peer review system.
View 1 more replies »
NerdyPotato · M
If the results can't be duplicated, they are meaningless, hence the requirement of peer review. And the scientific method is used for objectivity as well. It doesn't necessarily make things more expensive, so it has nothing to do with stopping poor people. If you want to get published, do proper research.
helenS · 36-40, F
@NerdyPotato
If the results can't be duplicated, they are meaningless
That's true for laboratory experiments, but not necessarily for environmental measurements.
Jm31xxx · 46-50, M
@NerdyPotato if the results are duplicate, I'm gonna call plagiarism.
NerdyPotato · M
@Jm31xxx well, not an exact copy of your data of course, but very similar with a different group of test subjects.
Lmao... without peer reviews, then there will be many more traumatised people out there in the world who suffered because of unnecessary experiments that we now know and accept are wrong.
Jm31xxx · 46-50, M
@HootyTheNightOwl but those experiences need to be done!!! But the zoo won't sell me any monkeys :(
SW-User
Try The Journal of Irreproducible Results, they should be able to help.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
I hope this is satire…great if so.