Top | Newest First | Oldest First
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
It's Hoax about money
View 21 more replies »
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@MasterLee I have Unicorn repellent. You don't see any, right?
@HoraceGreenley http://whatweknow.aaas.org/get-the-facts/ "The overwhelming evidence of human-caused climate change documents both current impacts with significant costs and extraordinary future risks to society and natural systems. The scientific community has convened conferences, published reports, spoken out at forums and proclaimed, through statements by virtually every national scientific academy and relevant major scientific organization — including the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) — that climate change puts the well-being of people of all nations at risk."
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@HoraceGreenley indeed. Unicorns cause global warming. Good riddance.
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
And at one time scientists said the sun revolves around the earth.
SW-User
@MrBrownstone They really said that?
@MrBrownstone No they didn't. The Catholic church of the middle ages said that.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Yeah more fakery
@MasterLee References
J. Cook, et al, "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming," Environmental Research Letters Vol. 11 No. 4, (13 April 2016); DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
Quotation from page 6: "The number of papers rejecting AGW [Anthropogenic, or human-caused, Global Warming] is a miniscule proportion of the published research, with the percentage slightly decreasing over time. Among papers expressing a position on AGW, [b]an overwhelming percentage (97.2% based on self-ratings, 97.1% based on abstract ratings) endorses the scientific consensus on AGW.”[/b]
J. Cook, et al, "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming," Environmental Research Letters Vol. 11 No. 4, (13 April 2016); DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
Quotation from page 6: "The number of papers rejecting AGW [Anthropogenic, or human-caused, Global Warming] is a miniscule proportion of the published research, with the percentage slightly decreasing over time. Among papers expressing a position on AGW, [b]an overwhelming percentage (97.2% based on self-ratings, 97.1% based on abstract ratings) endorses the scientific consensus on AGW.”[/b]
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
These guys are a joke. Wha happened to global warming? Get your lies straight.
@MrBrownstone The following page from the Gov't Office of Planning and Research, lists the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that hold the position that climate change has been caused by human action.
http://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html
http://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@badminton You didn’t even understand what I wrote.
@MrBrownstone Either term will do.
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@badminton Wrong. 2 different ideas.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@MrBrownstone Two different ideas only to people who don't understand the science. Scientists changed the terminology to global climate change from global warming because people like you couldn't understand that while the planet was warming, some areas may actually get colder due to changes in wind and sea currents and other factors. So it is the same phenomenon no matter what you call it.