Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Am Concerned About Climate Change

[b]Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[/b]

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is extremely likely (greater than 95 percent probability) to be the result of human activity since the mid-20th century and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented over decades to millennia.1

Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. This body of data, collected over many years, reveals the signals of a changing climate.

The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century.2 Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.

[b]References[/b]
IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, Summary for Policymakers

B.D. Santer et.al., “A search for human influences on the thermal structure of the atmosphere,” Nature vol 382, 4 July 1996, 39-46

Gabriele C. Hegerl, “Detecting Greenhouse-Gas-Induced Climate Change with an Optimal Fingerprint Method,” Journal of Climate, v. 9, October 1996, 2281-2306

V. Ramaswamy et.al., “Anthropogenic and Natural Influences in the Evolution of Lower Stratospheric Cooling,” Science 311 (24 February 2006), 1138-1141

B.D. Santer et.al., “Contributions of Anthropogenic and Natural Forcing to Recent Tropopause Height Changes,” Science vol. 301 (25 July 2003), 479-483.

In the 1860s, physicist John Tyndall recognized the Earth's natural greenhouse effect and suggested that slight changes in the atmospheric composition could bring about climatic variations. In 1896, a seminal paper by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius first predicted that changes in the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could substantially alter the surface temperature through the greenhouse effect.

National Research Council (NRC), 2006. Surface Temperature Reconstructions For the Last 2,000 Years. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page3.php

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/faq/indicators.php

http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp

https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20170118/
Levitus, S.; Antonov, J.; Boyer, T.; Baranova, O.; Garcia, H.; Locarnini, R.; Mishonov, A.; Reagan, J.; Seidov, D.; Yarosh, E.; Zweng, M. (2017). NCEI ocean heat content, temperature anomalies, salinity anomalies, thermosteric sea level anomalies, halosteric sea level anomalies, and total steric sea level anomalies from 1955 to present calculated from in situ oceanographic subsurface profile data (NCEI Accession 0164586). Version 4.4. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Dataset. doi:10.7289/V53F4MVP

https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7159

National Snow and Ice Data Center

World Glacier Monitoring Service

National Snow and Ice Data Center

Robinson, D. A., D. K. Hall, and T. L. Mote. 2014. MEaSUREs Northern Hemisphere Terrestrial Snow Cover Extent Daily 25km EASE-Grid 2.0, Version 1. [Indicate subset used]. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center. doi: https://doi.org/10.5067/MEASURES/CRYOSPHERE/nsidc-0530.001. [Accessed 9/21/18].

http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/sotc/snow_extent.html

Rutgers University Global Snow Lab, Data History Accessed September 21, 2018.

R. S. Nerem, B. D. Beckley, J. T. Fasullo, B. D. Hamlington, D. Masters and G. T. Mitchum. Climate-change–driven accelerated sea-level rise detected in the altimeter era. PNAS, 2018 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1717312115
https://nsidc.org/cryosphere/sotc/sea_ice.html
USGCRP, 2017: Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I [Wuebbles, D.J., D.W. Fahey, K.A. Hibbard, D.J. Dokken, B.C. Stewart, and T.K. Maycock (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 470 pp, doi: 10.7930/J0J964J6

http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/What+is+Ocean+Acidification%3F

http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/Ocean+Acidification

C. L. Sabine et.al., “The Oceanic Sink for Anthropogenic CO2,” Science vol. 305 (16 July 2004), 367-371

Copenhagen Diagnosis, p. 36.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
It's Hoax about money
SW-User
@HoraceGreenley So they are all in cahoots?
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@HoraceGreenley Oil companies would pay them much more to deny climate change.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@SW-User Not explicitly. Ph.D.'s need jobs. They have to publish or perish. They need grants and teaching positions. There are more Ph.D's in the world today than lived up to 1985. They aren't getting grants, jobs or published if their research isn't relevant.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@HoraceGreenley they spend millions to do fake studies to get more money
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@HoraceGreenley The facts of climate change are based on the supporting evidence.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@MasterLee Falsifying results is worth it. So is being an alarmist.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@badminton except the 'proof' is based on consensus of one group of questionable scientists. It proves nothing.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@badminton There is a lot of evidence to the contrary as well
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@HoraceGreenley

They are not questionable scientists. AAAS joined the leaders of 17 other leading organizations in signing a letter sent 21 October 2009 to the U.S. Senate, emphasizing based upon rigorous research that human-induced climate change is ongoing and will have broad impacts on society—including the global economy and the environment.
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@HoraceGreenley No there isn't.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@badminton If you say so then it must be true.
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@HoraceGreenley The following page lists the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that hold the position that climate change has been caused by human action.
http://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@badminton Good for you. There are thousands of scientists that disagree. They have even signed petitions to that effect.
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@HoraceGreenley References​
J. Cook, et al, "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming," Environmental Research Letters Vol. 11 No. 4, (13 April 2016); DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002

Quotation from page 6: "The number of papers rejecting AGW [Anthropogenic, or human-caused, Global Warming] is a miniscule proportion of the published research, with the percentage slightly decreasing over time. Among papers expressing a position on AGW, an overwhelming percentage (97.2% based on self-ratings, 97.1% based on abstract ratings) endorses the scientific consensus on AGW.”
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@badminton Being self-referential is not credible
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@HoraceGreenley Here is a list of nearly 200 rationalizations affirming the reality of human-caused climate change. So they're all allied in big conspiracy, opposed just by a plucky band of oil companies, is that it?
http://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@HoraceGreenley https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@badminton I've seen it
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@HoraceGreenley I've seen leprechauns. Prove me wrong. Lol
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@MasterLee https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

http://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@MasterLee I have Unicorn repellent. You don't see any, right?
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@HoraceGreenley http://whatweknow.aaas.org/get-the-facts/ "The overwhelming evidence of human-caused climate change documents both current impacts with significant costs and extraordinary future risks to society and natural systems. The scientific community has convened conferences, published reports, spoken out at forums and proclaimed, through statements by virtually every national scientific academy and relevant major scientific organization — including the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) — that climate change puts the well-being of people of all nations at risk."
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@HoraceGreenley indeed. Unicorns cause global warming. Good riddance.