Anxious
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Looks like the FDA has something BIG to hide...

[b]Fact-checkers on this one?[/b]

bookerdana · M
LifeSiteNews (or simply LifeSite) is a Canadian Catholic far-right anti-abortion advocacy website and news publication. LifeSiteNews has published misleading information and conspiracy theories, and in 2021, was banned from some social media platforms for spreading COVID-19 misinformation.
bookerdana · M
@WalterF no problemo,they are boring
WalterF · 70-79, M
@bookerdana All the more reason for not reading. I don't expect to see any more from you, then.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@bookerdana Yes, we must trust the moral judgemnt of Mr Zuckerberg. His bans are solely for the good of the people, and never to advance his own programme and wealth. No question, Zucko is up there with the world's great selfless philanthropists, Criminal Gates being the No 1.
OldBrit · 61-69, M
One minor thing... They already released the data

https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical-trials/trial-data-and-results

And https://clinicaltrials.gov/

It's one of the 1800 studies already released on that site.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@OldBrit The facts are there. The trouble is, the fact-checkers bury them. The article link is given above. Research all you want. And don't forget to preface any research you do with an "untrue" label
WalterF · 70-79, M
@OldBrit Here is an extract from the Second Joint Report in this case. (p 10 of 14)

[b]The FDA has proposed to produce 500 pages per month which, based on its calculated
number of pages, would mean it would complete its production in nearly 55 years – the year 2076.
Until the entire body of documents provided by Pfizer to the FDA are made available, an[/b]

(footnotes on page)
11 https://www.americaspromise.org/us-military-demographics#:~:text=Military%20Service%20Member%20Data
,were%202.1%20active%20duty%20members (last visited November 12, 2021).
12 See 21 CFR § 601.51(e).
13 [c=BF0000]Reports have recently surfaced that the FDA was aware of concerns about unsound practices in connection with clinical trials for the Pfizer Vaccine, but that FDA failed to properly investigate these claims.
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635[/c](last visited November 12, 2021)
OldBrit · 61-69, M
@WalterF I found a reuters report.

The reasoning for the delay seems not unreasonable huge amount of documents to review only 10 people in the department and 400 other requests.

Having filed drug applications with the FDA and say in review meetings one issue is the three fda always insists on all the data, all the forms etc. Essentially they then rerun the analysis rather than most other regulatory bodies who only require summary tables and final analysis and simply review that for inconsistencies. This request would be quicker expidited via the EU medicines agency or mhra in UK
CestManan · 46-50, F
Those born in 2000 will be on their death beds by 2076
@CestManan I might have known you would be here, agreeing with this crackpot and his unsubstantiated articles.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@LordShadowfire Oh it gets better! So sorry for you and your belief in killer viruses and magical "vaccines" and innocent Big Pharma!
CestManan · 46-50, F
@WalterF The thing about big pharma though - they do invent drugs that help with ailments BUT those meds often create just as many problems as they solve.

Like how there is this opioid epidemic. Doctors prescribe them, people get hooked, then the addicts are somehow the bad guys.

I mean you already knew all that but some people refuse to believe that this magical vax will eventually create it's own problems.
gol979 · 41-45, M
I thought this was a joke when I first read it but turns out to be true. Parody is dead
doong · 56-60, M
That's more than enough time for the Billion dollars they receive to disappear or multiply through other investment.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@doong ONE billion? More like one billion per day
Jenny1234 · 51-55, F
@WalterF please quote your source
WalterF · 70-79, M
@Jenny1234 Ridiculous comment. A site has to be "heard of" to be "reputable"?? What next?! I will say this - the weasily slippery fact-checkers are not lacking in imagination! Get a grip. Just realise that there is another reality out there that's being hidden from you and that you're refusing to look for. For your own sake.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@WalterF [quote]there is another reality out there[/quote]

Actually, it seems that for you there’s another reality ‘in there’.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 In or out, it exists, and you haven't seen it yet. This is tragic. Wake up. Is Fauci - America's doctor - a straight, honest gentleman? or is he a total crook? Trust him, with your health?
KainAbel1 · 46-50, M
Unzips [b]YES. INDEED THEY DO[/b]
CestManan · 46-50, F
@KainAbel1 Is it, it is, MONSTROUS?!
KainAbel1 · 46-50, M
@CestManan [b]ALL[/b]monster baby. Lol
Another questionable article from an unreliable source. The last one was from the Rants and Raves section of Craigslist. What are you going to post next, the back of a cereal box?
CestManan · 46-50, F
@LordShadowfire We also need to be worried about our pets catching covid-19, this package clearly shows a pug who caught it. That blue thing. The owners were careless and didn't get the pug vaccinated.

@CestManan Is this some bizarre attempt at humor?
CestManan · 46-50, F
@LordShadowfire It's an attempt to test your nerves 😁

 
Post Comment