Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

You can tell if a virus has been altered by man. There is a graft location called the double CGG or "double cig" that gives it away.

According to two expert virologists in the USA, Dr. Stephen Quay , CEO of biopharmaceutical company Atossa Therapeutics, and Richard Muller, a physics professor at the University of California, the Wuhan virus DNA contains the "double cig".

When the Chinese communist government showed the DNA chain photos to the WHO in January of 2020, they purposely omitted this section of the chain from the photos.


"In the new essay, Quay and Muller go on to state that those who believe COVID-19 began by being transferred from animals to humans 'must explain why it happened to pick its least favorite combination: CGG-CGG. Why did it replicate the choice the lab's gain-of-function researchers would have made?'"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9658851/Genome-sequencing-certainly-proves-COVID-deliberately-lab-experts-claim.html
The evidence keeps piling up
4meAndyou · F
@stratosranger There are 3 million dead worldwide. And now we see that the Chinese government was trying to cover up their own role in the creation of the virus...and also allowed their citizens to leave China and spread the virus to the entire world.
@4meAndyou Sounds like they let it happen on purpose, with intent.
4meAndyou · F
@stratosranger Yes...they did.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
Perplexing. They gave bad things good sounding names, and then good things bad sounding names.

Gain of danger. Gain of virulence. Feature packed. Fabulously dangerous.

Gain of function government grant for doctor foo chi.
4meAndyou · F
@SteelHands The only gain was in the virulence and ability of the virus to spread. You are right.

Dr. Fauci, and the head of the NIH in the USA, AND [i]the Pentagon[/i] signed off on funding 39 million dollars to Eco-Health Alliance, which in turn funded the Wuhan laboratory and it's gain of function research on SARS between 2013 and 2020.

In 2015, the Wuhan Lab actually published a PAPER in a scientific journal about their RNA research on SARS.

In the USA, we need to ask some VERY hard questions about how and why the Pentagon and the NIH were indirectly funding Eco-Health Alliance, and why they would do this without oversight.

AND we need to know what protections to the populace are in place at the virology labs in Galveston, Texas, and in North Carolina, which are conducting similar research.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
Yes. It's almost as if there are people who don't care about the prospects for the whole human race walking around with science degrees leaving their own asses hanging out for everyone to see.
AbbySvenz · F
Essay. An opinion piece, not a peer reviewed scientific paper
Viper · M
@AbbySvenz Yeah cloning is just reproducing what's already there...

Not sure why they would clone a negative thing, but whatever...
AbbySvenz · F
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ab-r0capbzk]
AbbySvenz · F
The cloned samples were used for research in combatting the new virus @Viper
Khenpal1 · M
If China had nothing to hide they would had shown it long time ago , only guilty is trying to hide things.
Budwick · 70-79, M
So, this is confirmation that the virus is 'manufactured' - right?
Not something natural from a wet market.
4meAndyou · F
@Budwick Correct.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@4meAndyou Thanks.
Very interesting.
4meAndyou · F
@Budwick We are at war and we don't even know it.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
PicturesOfACommunistFuture and QuickstopitSoul come to mind as well as WindFromHisAss @Stereoguy
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
No worries. They’re rubbish best forgotten. @Stereoguy

 
Post Comment