Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Aptitude test. Find the missing no.?

[image deleted]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Could be 0 or 120 lol
SW-User
Nope. 😁Lol.
@samdx008: then 45.. there are quite a lot of possible answers because they all fit the equation
SW-User
@icecoldzt: lol. But 120 doesn't fit as all nos will not satisfy that pattern.🙂
@samdx008: lol it does.. someone also answered 120 for that same reason
littlewonder1990 · 31-35, M
@icecoldzt: 120 does not use all the numbers in the equation. What are other possible answers?
SW-User
@icecoldzt: if you notice 6 and 9, then 120 doesn't fit.
@littlewonder1990: it did.. lol by following the pattern, you see 5 and 6, and 9 and 10 both has a difference of 1. Where 30 and 90 has a difference if 60. If you apply the same principle then that bottom figure could be 0 or 120 and it fits very well. Short lines vs long lines.
littlewonder1990 · 31-35, M
@icecoldzt:I am afraid thats not a logically reason 😯
@littlewonder1990: really? If you don't find that logical then 45 is not a logical asnwer as well lol
SW-User
@icecoldzt: 60 -30 is 30. 90-60 is 30. Ok. 120 -90 is 30. Ok. Cyclicity is formed. Now see, 6-5 is 1. Ok. 10 -6 is 4 not 1. Ok. 9-10 is -1 . Not 1 . So no cyclicity formed. It should be a coherent pattern.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
littlewonder1990 · 31-35, M
It is because 5 times 6 is 30 and with that you get the 60 90 and 45. Way more logical
@lucian: they were the ones who stopped too soon because they closed the possibility to the answer which is 45. When they told me that it's not, I kept on looking and found 45. So really it's not me who stopped looking. They closed their minds for the possibilities while I found 2 others
@littlewonder1990: I know that, I answered 45 as well after sam told me that it's not. Then I said there are 2 other possible answers which you said doesnt seem logical lol
littlewonder1990 · 31-35, M
@icecoldzt: I didnt stop looking. It is the only logical abswer. Your reasoning is flawed.
@littlewonder1990: why would it be flawed? You got 45 by following the logic of multiplying the numbers whereas I found my answers by deducting the numbers
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
littlewonder1990 · 31-35, M
@icecoldzt: you are not using all the numbers. Ok um bye!
SW-User
Don't be rude you guys. 🙂🙂
@lucian: lol it does make sense to me. The way it made sense to you the first time and to two other people who answered this q. I am not really making a big deal out of it but telling me that my answer is not logical is like telling everyone else that 45 is not logical as well
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
@icecoldzt: I habe given explanation to your logic earlier. Have you read that.?