Shouldn't teenagers (age 16 and above) have a legal right to have sex at home?
Some school districts distribute condoms. Shouldn't teenagers have a legal right to use those condoms at home?
[image deleted]
[image deleted]
This post may contain Adult content.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@Pretzel What I'm saying is that states recognize that kids have certain legal rights -- to food, to clothing, to education. Shouldn't states recognize that teens also have a basic human right to have sex and that parents should be required to allow them to have sex in their homes?
Pretzel · 61-69, M
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays the consequences of sex are life-altering.
I have no problem with 18 as the legal age.although prosecuting an 18 year old for having sex with a 17 year old seems pointless (and most states have exceptions for "romeo and juliet" situations - and even call them that)
and when it comes to sex in my house - the state can't tell me when my kids will have sex in my house - I raise my kids not the almighty state.
I have no problem with 18 as the legal age.although prosecuting an 18 year old for having sex with a 17 year old seems pointless (and most states have exceptions for "romeo and juliet" situations - and even call them that)
and when it comes to sex in my house - the state can't tell me when my kids will have sex in my house - I raise my kids not the almighty state.
@Pretzel Some school districts distribute condoms to kids. Those school districts are enabling sex. Kids like to say, "It's just fucking." And they're right. [i] It's no big deal.[/i] Get over it. Sexual inhibition leads to neurosis. You want your kids to be neurotic?
Pretzel · 61-69, M
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays I don't want them to be parents.