Do you think circumcised looks better?

Absolutely. It looks so much better without the wrinkled foreskin. Both my sons are done. In my opinion, all boys should be neatly and tightly circumcised.

I don't really care what other guys' dicks look like, to be honest. I'm uncircumcised and I'm fine with it. I've never had a girl have a problem with it either. I don't think circumcision should be done just for looks.

Imagine if we decided little girls had to alter their sexual organs at birth because men like the way it looks better. That would be considered super sexist.

looks neater

i like the looks better if circumcised. don't get me wrong, uncircumcised is nice, i just think circumcised looks better, very nice that way.

No they should only be circumcised if they have health problems. I like foreskins.

Women have massive - almost total influence over male circumcision.

First they alone decide who they will favour with a sexual relationship and a man's circumcision status forms part of the decision making process. There are Women who will not consider a man eligible for intimacy if he has a foreskin and others who will not consider a man eligible for oral sex if he has a foreskin.

I can tell you my Wife decided all right... and she makes very frequent and regular use of my circumcised penis...

Second Women have the authority to have any son they have circumcised as an infant - they get to decide for their son if he lives his life with or without a foreskin... in effect their preference is carried forward to the next generation. Small wonder my Wife and my Mother get along so well....

For most intact men, erection makes the foreskin vanish.
The only person whose opinion matters is the person connected to the foreskin under debate.
If I were to use my parental authority to shorten the labia minora of my daughters because I thought that ample labia spilling out of the cleft of Venus was unsightly, I would be seen as a monster -- and rightly so.
Last heard, male nudity is still taboo (the taboos against female nudity are eroding fast). The upshot is that how the foreskin looks does not matter, because very few people will see it other than the dude it is a part of.

Absolutely not.

It's not the look
The tip is differently sensitive after the cut
Do you prefer the look of a cut too?

Because it looks better and it’s healthier

Cut and uncut look quite different (that's just my opinion) ONLY if they are both limp. For most men, an erection makes their foreskin do a vanishing act. Women and gay men should value the appearance of only the erect penis. What the natural penis looks like when limp should not matter.

Yup

Can you differentiate a circumcised from an uncircumcised in full hot erection?

doesnt matter much I guess

definitely not my son is intact

I'm happy with it

Depends on choice...
According to medical science..foreskin is important ...it's keep glass sensitive...
Secondly protect tip of penis
If I talk about hygiene..one should wash it daily by removing foreskin with soap..

Yes

I would say yes. I have my foreskin. I'm not hating it; i think a circumcised penis does look nicer.

No, not at all. A circumcised penis looks obscene. No protective foreskin for us avid nude male hikers. 😡

Doesn't matter much either way.

I don't think so