Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I am happy about Chauvin's conviction, but I do feel it's inappropriate for the POTUS to make such comment on these types of cases. What do you think?

Maxine Waters' comments were inappropriate as hell too.
@SevIsPamprinYouAlways They were encouraging BLM and Antifa violence, including bailing them out of jail so they could be back out at it sooner. As guilty at it as Trump re Jan 6th.
@SevIsPamprinYouAlways I'm not defending Trump. I'm saying the Dems are as guilty over BLM and Antifa violence, looting and destruction campaign that went on for months across the country. That was about the election too.
SevIsPamprinYouAlways · 56-60, F
@Stillwaiting

You’re buying into a narrative carefully spun from the Right Wing. The violence at the summertime protests was organized and executed by far right groups. That’s not a cherry picked opinion; it’s demonstrative fact. Even the Justice Department under Trump’s administration was quite open about admitting this. The headlines above were only a fraction of the ones I could’ve retrieved. They all point to protests being hijacked by domestic terrorists from the Far Right, who used them to trigger violence and destruction.

However, I suspect neither of us will budge in our opinions/convictions on this matter. I just felt compelled to point out that the protests didn’t lead to violence and riots until white nationalists got involved.
Heartlander · 80-89, M
I have mixed feelings about this case.

I applaud the idea that police officers are individually accountable and don't enjoy a special privilege to treat people like dirt in the exercise of their authority.

But ... I watched about half of the court proceedings, and the prosecution's case seemed to be more about defending the police department, the city and the system, and indirectly hanging Chauvin in the process. Chauvin's defense appeared to be intentionally shallow and steered clear of deflecting Chauvin's conduct onto his supervisors, department, training, etc. When Chauvin hid behind the 5th and refused to testify on his own behalf, what struct me then was that he was a willing scapegoat, and maybe a back-room deal was at play.

When Biden and Harris participated in the post-verdict celebration, what struct me was that the whole thing was planned political drama.
Heartlander · 80-89, M
@Zeusdelight Yes, and it reminds me of how a family member's speeding ticket was handled.
Zeusdelight · 61-69, M
@Heartlander Happy to equate a speeding ticket with a person's death?
Heartlander · 80-89, M
@Zeusdelight I'll ignore the part about how many people die at the hands of speeding or reckless drivers, and stick to my general impression: the Chauvin trial smells of political theater. And much like that speeding ticket was handled by a bit of trickery, I suspect that there's more to this than what they want us to see.

Interesting that I didn't see any mention of racism in the trial process. I didn't watch it all but what I did see had no racial component from either side. But, to watch Biden and Harris post-verdict address, it was all about systemic racism.
A giant step forward? Biden's a dreamer if he thinks that's the case
LoveTriumphsOverHate · 36-40, M
@BeefySenpie I think it is a faint step forward, but under our fair system of democracy and our fair justice system, I don't believe his comments were appropriate.
I'm torn about that. He did wait until the jury was sequestered.

It seemed strange, but if POTUS can share his opinion about other national events, which this one certainly was, then why not? Previous presidents have had no compunction about commenting on current events.
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
No one seemd bothered by Trump offering his opinions on legal battles and procedures.


This is irrelevant.

Maybe the issue has always been Presidents who DON'T say what they should.


Grant was a valiant man...but Reconstruction failed for many reasons...one of them being the inability of the President( Grant) to assert his vision for the country based on his belief that Congress and senate had all the power.
Harmonium1923 · 51-55, M
I disagree. That murder caused a national crisis. I think it is precisely the president’s job to discuss it in a way that promotes justice and healing, which he did.
Nyloncapes · 61-69, M
Politicians comment on anything if it is what they think people want to hear and boost there ratings , do it here all the time in uk
JesseInTX · 51-55, M
His address after the verdict was read was fine but his comments during deliberations were inappropriate.
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
Also. That judge is the more concerning issue. He offerd legal advice to the defense while the jury was out of the room. That strikes me as far more of an issue than politicians offering their opinions.

First Amendment applies to all. Not just some.
Zeusdelight · 61-69, M
@JaggedLittlePill But there are always discussions on legal points that it is inappropriate for the Jury to hear. If it was out of bounds, the other side will take it further.
Trump always commented on such stuff. Politicians use such stuff to push their own agendas
LoveTriumphsOverHate · 36-40, M
@InOtterWords Yeah - and we got rid of Trump.
@LoveTriumphsOverHate thankfully !
REMsleep · 41-45, F
If something is tearing the country apart and it's part of a long standing human rights concern especially with historical undertones,I think that it's prudent for the Potus to not ignore this type of current event.
He shouldn't speak on these things daily but it was historic and important and it may quell unrest.
His only opinion was that justice was served which really in a court of law should not be controversial
SevIsPamprinYouAlways · 56-60, F
[image]@REMsleep

 
Post Comment