Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Picklebobble2 [quote]We all learned to think for ourselves a long time ago.[/quote]
You seem a reasonably intelligent person, but you have to know this isn't true for at least 60M+ just in the USA.
You seem a reasonably intelligent person, but you have to know this isn't true for at least 60M+ just in the USA.
BananaBrown · 41-45, F
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SW-User
@JAYS21 where is the solution? Should we create laws that regulate how they present information?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
akindheart · 61-69, F
sure, but you need to look at how and why to make sense of it.
For example, commercial media is profit driven, and both advertisers and audiences influence what they cover and how they cover it. A political agenda is often part of that, but I think it's often overstated. They're often just chasing ratings and profits
For example, commercial media is profit driven, and both advertisers and audiences influence what they cover and how they cover it. A political agenda is often part of that, but I think it's often overstated. They're often just chasing ratings and profits
Budwick · 70-79, M
Ahh, Yeah!
Journalism is dead.
Media is nothing more than propaganda anymore.
Journalism is dead.
Media is nothing more than propaganda anymore.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@SW-User I was born on the 50's.
By the time I was your age, things were already going South.
By the time I was your age, things were already going South.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@SW-User Interesting that you selected such a precise topic.
But yes, I think they did a good job reporting.
Back in the 60's when there was still actual racism,
the race riots were reported on, long film segments provided, followed by narratives from both sides.
I think news reporting is what gave movements Like Dr. King some traction.
But yes, I think they did a good job reporting.
Back in the 60's when there was still actual racism,
the race riots were reported on, long film segments provided, followed by narratives from both sides.
I think news reporting is what gave movements Like Dr. King some traction.
James1956 · 61-69, M
Yes without a doubt
TexChik · F
😲 our MSM ?
akindheart · 61-69, F
@TexChik LOL...
assemblingaknob · 26-30, F
Yes. Depends though. Sometimes it's just for a nice juicy clickbait to get those views rolling in.
Pfuzylogic · M
It depends what country you are from.
Are you from the U.S. ?
Are you from the U.S. ?
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
Depends on the form of media.
bijouxbroussard · F
uncalled4 · 56-60, M
Absolutely. People think they're changing the world.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SW-User
@daisymay however I do believe his comment is very broad and generalized.
SW-User
@daisymay he might have a point even though I might now like it. His concerns is that most news can be one sided. Even he does watch fox news then I would have to disregard that point unfourtunately
daisymay · 51-55, T
@SW-User [quote]because that not word for word what im reading in his original comment.
[/quote]
Oh? Did you read "word for word" my comment where I ALSO said
[quote]or variation on that theme[/quote]
[b]literally[/b] immediately after the part you're dissecting? If not, allow me to string it together for you as originally written so that the context is more clear
[quote]plus when you come out of the gate with "all the media is leftist propaganda" or variation on that theme[/quote]
See? It's not quite the affront you are attempting to have it be 🤷♀️
[/quote]
Oh? Did you read "word for word" my comment where I ALSO said
[quote]or variation on that theme[/quote]
[b]literally[/b] immediately after the part you're dissecting? If not, allow me to string it together for you as originally written so that the context is more clear
[quote]plus when you come out of the gate with "all the media is leftist propaganda" or variation on that theme[/quote]
See? It's not quite the affront you are attempting to have it be 🤷♀️