Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why is it when people start relationships with someone who has a certain type of job, they end up wanting them to leave said job?

For example, X has been a cop before meeting Y, but after they get into a relationship or married, Y wants X to give up that job?

You got him/her in that particular profession, why demand a change afterwards?

Do you think it's fair?
DearAmbellina2113 · 41-45, F
Look. I'm old and tired. I'll change for myself and I'll change for the sake of saving the planet (like recycling, or buying an electric vehicle, etc), but if some young buck comes along and thinks I'm gonna rearrange my entire life for him, he can eat a bag of dicks.

At my age, you know who you are and what you're about, and you're finished with the whole "experimental" finding-yourself stage of life. You'd do best to find a partner whose already-established life meshes nicely with yours.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
iMystery · M
@DearAmbellina2113 I feel you.
SW-User
I feel like it depends on the type of job. There are some where it would be reasonable. Like after you have kids and it ain't just about the both of you anymore. The lives and wellbeing of your children would probably mean more to you than your job. It's manipulative when you're just starting out and the conditions of your relationship are the same. The person basically signed up for it. But things change in your environment and in your life that make it so that you really don't want your partner to be in certain situations. You may be fine with dating a soldier until 10 years later when you have two kids and a war has just broken out. That said, I wouldn't really think it would be fair if it was a job that a person has spent their entire life studying for and that they're very passionate about. That's just kinda heartless.
iMystery · M
@SW-User I was waiting for someone to mention the "kids coming along afterwards" scenario.

In those cases I would say having kids should be a discussion even before marriage/long term partnership, which should then have included the impact a certain profession might have on that desire to have kids 🤔.
SW-User
@iMystery Kids aren't always a part of the plan. I don't know if you've ever been in a commited, long term relationship, but a lot of people don't really go in thinking they'll be having kids right away, and if they do discuss it, they might think they don't want any at the time and change their mind later on in their lives. That's the thing with long term relationships. You both change with each other. You obviously won't want the same things you wanted at 20 when you're 37, and there's no way to account for that before starting the relationship.

And either way, I would think most people wouldn't just leave someone that they have a connection with because of a future possibility that may not even come to fruition. It's like me leaving my boyfriend now because I want a big house and he wants a small one. It's obvious that if you care for each other, a compromise is going to be made, so you don't really need to worry about it before it happens.

Anyways, family planning isn't exactly top priority for young couples. Doesn't matter what conversation "should have happened" if it wasn't a priority at the time. Perhaps people unwilling to change their career for their kids shouldn't be in a relationship. When you have children, it isn't about you or what you want anymore. It isn't about conversations you may or may not have had with your partner, and you can't turn back the clock and just choose not to be together. At that point, you need to make decisions for your family. Doesn't matter how the relationship started out.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
No it’s a career, have them quit that and they may break up later and it will be regretful for the one who quit their job.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@iMystery Even if they don’t break up they will resent having to change something like a career because their partner didn’t like it. That resentment tends to grow as the new wears off the relationship.
iMystery · M
@cherokeepatti Very true... This then sparks other fights which may be seemingly unrelated to that resentment, but subconsciously that resentment is displayed in other behaviour
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@iMystery that’s generally the pattern of it. I had a cousin who’s sweetheart & fiancé he met in high school. He got drafted & was sent to Vietnam. His fiancé had long hair that she never cut in high school. He asked her to keep her hair long while he was gone & not to cut it & she promised she would. He did his stint & came back & they got married. They were married a couple of years and he started asking her to cut her hair. She refused, he kept asking, then pressuring her, it went on a few years & they started fighting. Ended up getting divorced. I think the hair was symbolic to each in different ways, to her it was her way of saying she waited for him & for him it reminded him of the war. To get a divorce over the length of hair on the woman seems unimaginable. I think they should have gone to counseling but divorced instead.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Oh i know how this goes !

So you stop mentioning what goes on at work and the other half says...
"Why don't you ever mention work ?" - Like you have something to hide.
And so it goes on..

No. Can't be doing with it.
iMystery · M
@Picklebobble2 😅 Sounds like someone is speaking of experience.
Melpomene · 22-25, F
"Oh, I didn't know you'll mean so much to me" kind of thing?
Jokes aside, maybe they realise how dangerous that job is or there's an opportunity for a new/different kind of job?
Maybe they want something better for the person they love?
I think it's normal to want the best for your partner but there's no reason to expect someone to change their job just because the other person doesn't like it.
Melpomene · 22-25, F
@iMystery I'm starting to think you just want people to side with you...
iMystery · M
@Melpomene Not at all.
Melpomene · 22-25, F
@iMystery Then X and Y should have an honest talk about how they feel and why.
But dad!!! I can change him!!
@SW-User Yep. If you change the person then they are no longer the person that first attracted you to begin with!
iMystery · M
@SW-User Yeah and they are the first to complain "You are no longer the person I first met"...

OF COURSE NOT!!! YOU CHANGED HIM! 🤣
SW-User
@iMystery lol. Exactly. Stoopid. Stoopid. Stoopid. I don't have the patience for such idiocy.
SweetMae · 70-79, F
No! That isn't fair. It would be different if X became a cop later in the relationship
iMystery · M
@SweetMae I agree, because that would be a change to the relationship environment.
SW-User
No, it's not fair. But, if it's a job that has a certain amount of danger tied to it, I can understand their being fearful of losing the person they love.
Carissimi · 70-79, F
I suppose it could be that at the start of the relationship, they are not in love. Loving someone makes a difference to how you feel about their safety and losing them.@iMystery
iMystery · M
@Carissimi That may happen yes, but then the person who wasn't in love since the beginning should question themselves and ask why they got involved in the first place.
Carissimi · 70-79, F
Most people are not in love when they start dating. Love comes later. I find it odd that you think you must love someone before you start a relationship. That’s what a relationship is for, to get to know someone. @iMystery
RubySoo · 56-60, F
Its just the same as loving somebodies outgoing nature and popularity....then demanding tbey stop seeing their friends once youre together.

Its control.....
iMystery · M
@RubySoo Yeah some people have serious control issues.
Who wants to depend on a guy who might be shot dead or killed in a car chase tomorrow? They hooked up with him in the first place for financial security but would want him to find a safer means of employment (another form of stability).
@cherokeepatti He is correct. A man should be attracted to a woman primarily over maternal instincts, not physical attributes. And a woman should be attracted to all forms of stability, not just financial.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@Anonymartyr My sister-in-law did that too. She grew up in a family with 8 children and 1 breadwinner. So money was spread really thin, they had what they needed and not a whole lot more. She dated the neighbor boy and when they got old enough (she was 16 & the parents signed for her) they got married. Her husband was going to engineering school & she said they’d be rich. But after she got everything she wanted (nice custom home, new vehicles, new furniture, etc.) she got bored. They had 3 children and she divorced him saying he was a stick-in-the-mud because he didn’t want to go out all the time, bored with his job etc.
@cherokeepatti Fortunately my wife and I never had any children.
polyandrym66 · 70-79, M
It's crazy to think that IF you love someone, that you WILL change them to fit your desires and needs.. UNLESS it is just small changes..
@polyandrym66 It is just as true to say that you cannot love someone on the basis that the other dos not have a large enough income. That has nothing to do with love.
4meAndyou · F
I think change is a constant in any relationship. Thinking about your scenario, I would speculate that Y probably got involved with X and fell in love, but was really pretty ignorant or ill informed about what was actually involved in his job.

Even more speculatively: As time went by, Y realized that X would have to be in constant danger, and began to fear that X would be killed...and that fear grew with every news or television show that Y watched. Perhaps Y began to want X to be safe...ALL the time...because Y's love had deepened.
NotValid · 31-35, F
No it isn't fair. People need to quit seeing this as a joke
Chevy454 · 46-50, M
Because they are controlling. Simple as that. It will never end.
[c=#359E00]it should be discuss before getting married[/c]
iMystery · M
@YukikoAmagi It should be discussed before even starting a relationship with that person.
MellyMel22 · F
[i][c=#BF0080]It’s definitely unfair. [/c][/i]
Yeah that sucks.
tj78610 · 51-55, M
Not fair. But truthfully love changes things too, so I understand it.
You cannot expect people to change.
iMystery · M
@InOtterWords Totally agree.
Mrsbetweenfatandfit · 26-30, F
Honestly I think people can want to leave for many things that existed on day 1. In regards to employment thats dangerous I understand how once you’ve grown to love them, the idea of everyday being scared to lose them could become overwhelming. It takes a special strength to stay supportive when you know the risks the person you love takes everyday. I’m not saying it’s fair to the person who believed their partner understood and supported them. I can only imagine it would be down right heart wrenching and frustrating. I’m just not certain how they could go about avoiding it.
iMystery · M
@Mrsbetweenfatandfit Yet that is what they signed up for from the get go.

Imagine what the wives of Navy SEALS and other Special Forces or Combat Soldiers must go through. Yet its something they signed up for.
Mrsbetweenfatandfit · 26-30, F
@iMystery I understand that. But it’s not an unheard of thing to say you are prepared to accept something... that is until you are living it. Realize you aren’t prepared to do that and then what are the options

 
Post Comment