When do “pro-choice” feminists not even pretend they are about choice?
[center]
[/center]
When they want the State to force mothers to work: [i] “Rather than wail about the supposed liberation in a woman’s right to choose to shun paid employment, we should make it a legal requirement that all parents of children of school-age or older are gainfully employed....
Only when the female half of the population is expected to hold down a job and earn money to pay the bills in the same way that men are routinely expected to do will we see things change for the better for either gender.
Only when the tiresome and completely unfounded claim that “feminism is about choice” is dead and buried (it’s not about choice, it’s about equality) will we consign restrictive gender stereotypes to history....
Holding us less accountable when it comes to our employment responsibilities is not doing anyone any favours. Not children, not fathers, not bosses — and certainly not women.”[/i][b] ~ Sarrah Le Marquand[/b] [c=#BF0000]http://bit.ly/2nPhtfV[/c]
In Sarrah Le Marquand's State-centered universe, the purpose of life is work, and serving the State, and the interruption of children will only be tolerated for so long.
For Ms. Le Marquand, the primary responsibility is to the State, not the family. Gainful employment that pays taxes is a higher duty than parenting. Children’s interests are best served not by their mothers, but by the State. Women’s interests can only be fulfilled by the State.
Homeschooling is out of the question ...
Home is merely where everyone lands to sleep after doing their duty to the State earning a taxable income all day. Those children who manage to escape the State-sanctioned slaughter in the womb, will be shaped and indoctrinated by the State each day to be obedient little wards who become compliant adults who keep their responsibility to the State. [c=#BF0000]http://bit.ly/2n4LoQm[/c]
Your comment underlines the morally chaotic times in which we live in which people can argue simultaneously that a constitutional right exists to kill kids prior to birth and that the State after birth must intervene to prevent parents from exercising any physical discipline over their kids. This would be funny if the consequences of all of this were not so lethal in millions of lives destroyed by abortion and millions of lives destroyed by parents who abdicate their responsibility as parents to the State.
