Did he really think that "pulling out" of ****** was such a progressive idea that it wouldn't matter who would get murdered as a result?

I don’t have a problem pulling out of Syria. Our goal should always be less deployment instead of more. The problem is that he’s too much of a headline craving simpleton to actually utilize his own state department and defense department to develop and execute a controlled withdrawal that’s coordinated, negotiated, and communicated in a way that [i]doesn’t[/i] result in the slaughter of our allies. This situation punctuates in excruciating fashion how he’s patently unqualified for the job.

Don’t see any loud mouth countries running in to fill the Massive void of 50 troops..
Nobody gives a shit. They just want to pretend to..
Isis was beaten.. now it’s home time.. fight your own battles

By all means pull the troops out but don't be an idiot about it. Now with got a betrayal on our hands, nearly 1000 escaped ISIS fighters and being shot at and cut off by the turks. It is a clusterfuck.

Obama sure did when he pulled out of Iraq and created this problem!

Maybe, but my guess is that he thought thats the ends justified the means and that those ends included a lot more than isolationism.

Oh, my mind went a totally different direction. >.>;