Top | Newest First | Oldest First
xSharp · 31-35, M
sure if they exist "peacefully" and do not bulldoze neighboring peoples homes or simply kick whole families out and move their own people into the houses then yes they should be allowed to exist, but they should be allowed to exist on their own ability to do so, if they stole the land and the original occupants want it back then they are right to try and take it back because they have a right to their own country as well.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 26-30, M
They can both be bigots
View 1 more replies »
Jackaloftheazuresand · 26-30, M
"Intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself," I'm pretty sure the opposition are capable of that.
SW-User
@Jackaloftheazuresand
[quote]Intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself[/quote]
No one is talking about that in a general sense. Talking about specifically being unaccepting of views that include disregarding the rights of others to peacefully exist.
[quote]Intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself[/quote]
No one is talking about that in a general sense. Talking about specifically being unaccepting of views that include disregarding the rights of others to peacefully exist.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 26-30, M
If we're talking about actual rights then why are we discussing bigotry, this is a legal issue and there is no reason to bring in social themes.