Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Are ancestry DNA testing fake?

I ordered one and I am beginning to think what if it's a waste of money. 😖
TexChik · F
no its not fake. The science is exact. Whether or not the results are to your liking is a different matter.
JBird · F
@TexChik I am open to any outcomes. I just don't want it to be fake
TexChik · F
@JBird there is a huge data base . If you are a criminal I wouldn’t submit a sample ... but other than that , go for it . I am descended from murderous River pirates that ranged from Paris, TX to Hugo, OK. 🤷🏻‍♀️
JBird · F
@TexChik I am sure I am not criminal. Lol
how can they trace your ancestry back generations before there was DNA testing. they feed you a line of BS and sell your DNA to every law enforcement agency in the world. can you say SCAM
JBird · F
@saragoodtimes [quote]
how can they trace your ancestry back generations before there was DNA testing.
[/quote]

They used to do it by tracing up your family. It's not reliable though.
Powderflask · 31-35, M
I'm sure the results are real but I'm equally sure the government is getting those records- with or without your consent.
JBird · F
@Powderflask I don't know what American government do with a 27 year old Indian woman's DNA? 😆
Powderflask · 31-35, M
@JBird I didn't say American government. Do you think the American government is the only one with DNA cataloging?
drymer · 56-60, M
Why do you think it's a waste of money? I did mine years ago (when technology wasn't as good) and it confirmed the geographical ancestry that had been passed "word-of-mouth" on over generations (that the family was originally from Scotland) and it narrowed down the area to southern Scotland (the Borders region)
drymer · 56-60, M
@JBird No no... Ancestry.com is a well-establish website/company (I've been a member since 1997), it's not some obscure, shady company... I have to say, though, that it greatly upsets me that Ancestry.com essentially bought dozens of formerly-free, volunteer-maintained databases so now they have a virtual monopoly of genealogical data and people have to pay for access to information that was formerly free. I'm lucky I did most of my research around 2000 - 2010 and didn't have to spend much money, if at all... So in summary, I think Ancestry.com is trustworthy but I loath them for making people pay for data that was formerly available for free (I'm a "free" member, I've never paid the monthly membership... in the old days they had lots of records available for free, too... but not anymore...)
JBird · F
@drymer I didn't chose ancestry.com because they don't have much database for south Asians. My Indian friends recommended me myheritage.com which has wider data compared to ancestry.com.
drymer · 56-60, M
@JBird Oh you said "ancestry DNA" and I misunderstood "ancestry.com DNA", sorry... So I would not know, although I believe myheritage.com has been around for a bit too... It's much harder tracking ancestry from outside Europe as these sort of records were seldom kept (people would just throw away records they considered "too old" and thus "pointless" to keep...)
Zaphod42 · 46-50, M
Did you turn out to be a black Asian Mexican? 😂
JBird · F
@Zaphod42 I didn't even provide the samples. 😂
Zaphod42 · 46-50, M
@JBird Well for what it’s worth, my dad did the 23 and me test and it more or less lined up with the ancestry research he had done on his own 🤷‍♂️
MarineBob · 56-60, M
It's a preference and a debate topic
Maximusmax · M
It's not fake but it is based on percentage of mating DNA to a region. Which is not the same as matching one person's DNA to another as in matching family members to each other or a person to a crime scene
Magenta · F
Hmm I don't think anything is a 100% perfect science. I don't see much point to them, unless it's for forensic/criminal investigation or paternity.
FreestyleArt · 31-35, M
No but they're great buddies with Google. I wouldn't go further to use it

 
Post Comment