Top | Newest First | Oldest First
It's a useful resource. Usually very accurate. Most of the claims are sourced and you can check them out for yourself.
As with all sources, it's a good idea to get more than one but i've found Wikipedia to be very reliable.
As with all sources, it's a good idea to get more than one but i've found Wikipedia to be very reliable.
View 1 more replies »
@MadisonBilly
Like i said, you should always check more than one source.
But my experience is that it's reliable.
Like i said, you should always check more than one source.
But my experience is that it's reliable.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Thodsis · 51-55, M
It's a good website. It's peer-reviewed and the organisers seem to be very aware of it's flaws.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Thodsis · 51-55, M
@MadisonBilly I don't have a website.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Boallods · 26-30, M
Unreliable, biased BS site. Not that one shouldn't use it - rather, it should be only one of the sources, but not THE source.
deadgerbil · 22-25
It's good at what it does, providing information with sources to help provide some direction for further inquiry.
JustLikeGreta · F
I use it, but I realize anyone can contribute.
SW-User
Useful starting point
SW-User
Not good for research purposes. I don't allow my students to use it
SaulGoodman · 26-30, M
I just updated the Wikipedia to tell uou
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
A mine of misinformation.