This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Dolimyte · 41-45, M
Have you ever convinced anybody with this garbage? It's cool if you want to believe whatever, but you are not very convincing.
1-25 of 54
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Dolimyte Perhaps he needs it in order to convince himself
Dolimyte · 41-45, M
@newjaninev2 probably to stoke his persecution complex.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@Sharon We can thank him for that.
@Dolimyte I have seen some people convinced by these arguments but all of them already had mental issues and were somewhat religious and looking to begin with. People like in this video prey on the weak and vunerable as they aren't equipped to defend themselves. Its also why they go after children as well.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@canusernamebemyusername Yes, it’s repugnant, even quite disgusting, how eager they are to gain access to children.
It reflects their inability to deal with any level of questioning, rational argument, or analysis.
It reflects their inability to deal with any level of questioning, rational argument, or analysis.
Sharon · F
@canusernamebemyusername [quote]People like in this video prey on the weak and vunerable [/quote]
That's why I challenge christians when they try to spread their lies and propaganda. I don't care what they believe but I'll try to stop them exploiting the weak and vulerable.
That's why I challenge christians when they try to spread their lies and propaganda. I don't care what they believe but I'll try to stop them exploiting the weak and vulerable.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Dolimyte [quote]Have you ever convinced anybody with this garbage?[/quote]
Are you calling science, garbage?
Are you calling science, garbage?
Dolimyte · 41-45, M
@GodSpeed63 the way science is being represented here is what's garbage.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Dolimyte [quote]the way science is being represented here is what's garbage.[/quote]
Are you saying that they're wrong about DNA and RNA?
Are you saying that they're wrong about DNA and RNA?
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 [quote]Are you calling science, garbage?[/quote]
What you refer to as science, certainly.
What you refer to as science, certainly.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Bushranger [quote]What you refer to as science, certainly.[/quote]
I'll ask you then, Bushranger. Are you saying that they're wrong about DNA and RNA?
I'll ask you then, Bushranger. Are you saying that they're wrong about DNA and RNA?
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 What, precisely, are they saying about DNA and RNA?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Bushranger as little as he can, I imagine 😂
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Your video is a customised [i]animation[/i] from some Pakistani on-line ‘study’ site.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 I did. All it does is show how DNA works.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 A pretty good job of animation, though.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought it was not possible to view a living cell in an electron microscope.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 Disagree with what, specifically? Of course I agree that DNA and RNA code for proteins, a process that's been going on a lot longer than 6,000 years. Yes, it can go wrong and, yes, cells don't function properly when it does. But what is the specific point you are trying to make?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Bushranger [quote]not possible to view a living cell in an electron microscope[/quote]
That’s correct... the samples are placed in a vacuum
That’s correct... the samples are placed in a vacuum
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 I bet @GodSpeed63 believes the animations were actually video.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Bushranger Surely not!
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 One would hope not, but...
1-25 of 54