Real Science Confirms A Much Younger Earth [Spirituality & Religion]

Question: If i defined "real science" as any science which confirmed flat earth and "fake science" as anything which confirmed globe earth, would you consider that to be an honest handling of the evidence?

That is to say, if i only accepted into my body of evidence that evidence which [i]confirmed [/i]my bias, would you consider that to be an honest and accurate way to gather evidence?

Think carefully and respond thoughtfully.

I think there is a lot of evidence the Bible is right.

‘Real' science where this shyster says "don’t get bogged down in too many details"??!!

and then immediately goes on to confound carbon dating and radiometric dating?

Hilarious!!

How many used cars does he sell?

AIG Statement of Faith:

"The 66 books of the Bible are the written Word of God. The Bible is divinely inspired and inerrant throughout. Its assertions are factually true in all the original autographs. It is the supreme authority in everything it teaches. Its authority is not limited to spiritual, religious or redemptive themes but includes its assertions in such fields as history and science.

The final guide to the interpretation of Scripture is Scripture itself."

They admit to holding the Bible as the Supreme authority. Not God. They worship a false God. Biblioidolatry.

"Real science" ≠ "pseudoscience that tries to prove your point"

Yes, don’t get lost in the technical details...I will tell you what to think...
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
You can’t shop science.

I'm looking up and I'm seeing oganeeson at atomic number 118 as being the highest stable element. That would mean they can't use it in the magnets of wind generators. Can you show that the neodymium is really a thing and that it's used as such?

This is old news 😂

😂

😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣