This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly Adult
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Are churches essential? [Spirituality & Religion]

If they can maintain social distancing are they really more dangerous than other businesses? Should people knowing the possible danger be allowed to decide!
TexChik · F
Since our rights guaranteed by the Constitution are essential, yes. Is it a coincidence that those who go to church also don't vote democrat?
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by SimilarWorlds staff.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@spjennifer I live in a city of over 1.2 million. There have been 12 deaths. 0.001%. BTW 0.001% is not 350000. Sad that they didn't teach math at nursing school.
Essential and a natural right
Quizzical · 46-50, M
No.

If God did exist, and lived up to his reputation of being omnipresent, then he would, by definition, be everywhere. Meaning you could worship him anywhere and your prayers would be heard.

Churches are largely just a way to fleece believers of their hard earned cash.
Quizzical · 46-50, M
@AnneHoney Again... rights devoid of responsibility

I did however state that I was no expert...

[quote]You assume gathering in large groups will spread the virus. That has been shown not to be the case.[/quote]

As for that statement, I don't know how you could possibly have made it. Is the virus being transmitted by long distance telepathy then?

[quote][b]Symptomatic transmission[/b]
By way of definition, a symptomatic COVID-19 case is a case who has developed signs and symptoms compatible with COVID-19 virus infection. Symptomatic transmission refers to transmission from a person while they are experiencing symptoms.
Data from published epidemiology and virologic studies provide evidence that COVID-19 is [b]primarily transmitted from symptomatic people to others who are in close contact through respiratory droplets, by direct contact with infected persons, or by contact with contaminated objects and surfaces[/b].1-7 This is supported by detailed experiences shared by technical partners via WHO global expert networks, and reports and presentations by Ministries of Health. Data from clinical and virologic studies that have collected repeated biological samples from confirmed patients
provide evidence that shedding of the COVID-19 virus is highest in upper respiratory tract (nose and throat) early in the course of the disease.8-11 That is, within the first 3 days from onset of symptoms.10-11 Preliminary data suggests
that people may be more contagious around the time of symptom onset as compared to later on in the disease.[/quote]
AnneHoney · 36-40, F
Much of that is no longer policy. The first sentence, close proximity to infected. They retracted the surfaces part a couple days ago for example. Now saying you are not going to catch it from a surface.

Churches can like other places insist on masks and social distancing. I heard this morning they will likely reduce distancing to 3 feet from 6 based on additional data.

And keep those over 70 in a separate area of the church. Services can be held safely just like shopping at Costco.@Quizzical
Quizzical · 46-50, M
@AnneHoney So let me get this straight...


According to what you are saying, you can't get it from surfaces and you can't get it from close proximity or large gatherings...

So how exactly have 4.9 million people got it when it doesn't seem (according to what you are relating) to be particularly transmittable? 🤔
You know what’s natural?
My immune system that’s worked fine thus far ..
Doomflower · 36-40, M
I am for removing all restrictions from churches. Honestly it's like saying outright that their god won't protect them if they show up wearing masks and gloves and social distancing. I say let god keep them safe.
AnneHoney · 36-40, F
@Doomflower if you recall the stay at home was put in place so hospitals were not overwhelmed by cases. Hospitals are empty. The more people that become infected but don’t need hospitalization the better off we all are.
Doomflower · 36-40, M
@AnneHoney more people infected will inevitably lead to hospitalizations as they will spread it to the vulnerable.
AnneHoney · 36-40, F
Nope, almost everyone will get it eventually just a matter of not wanting too many to need hospital at the same time. Less than 2% that are exposed need medical care. @Doomflower
Budwick · 70-79, M
Our Constitution was written in part to guarantee right to practice our religion.

Going grocery shopping, getting hair cuts, etc. isn't even mentioned - but, Whoop, there it is!
AnneHoney · 36-40, F
Governor of Michigan who is on Biden’s short list has said they will arrest people who attempt to attend church.@Budwick
Budwick · 70-79, M
@AnneHoney She has got to KNOW that she has made a bad decision.
I'm convinced it's really all about getting in our face saying "I'M in control, lowly citizen. Now, STFU'.
Dlrannie · 31-35, F
I was always taught that God is all around so no they are not essential
TexChik · F
@Dlrannie You arent a christian , but those who are wish to congregate . That right is guaranteed by the constitution, which means libs cant stop it. Where are all your social distancing concerns when blue state governors intentionally put covid patients into nursing homes? Social distancing was never intended to prevent the disease spread, but rather to keep hospitals from being over run. Cuomo orders the covid patients being placed in nursing homes instead of an empty hospital ship sitting in the harbor.
Dlrannie · 31-35, F
@TexChik Your attitude is not in the slightest bit Christian when you cannot comprehend that people can exercise their Christian faith in different ways to the one you do.
TexChik · F
@Dlrannie People can worship as they want. I do as the Bible says . You however, want to deny me and others of faith our right to congregate . You are clearly clueless and have no idea what being Christian , worship, and fellowship are all about. But you have the unending desire to deny people of faith the right to worship as they see fit because you don’t have any ( faith) . . .
JBird · F
Not for me. They opened 'other' businesses because it's [i] essential[/i]. If government decide to close down supermarkets or repair services, how long would you survive? Did people die because they didn't go to church? If we let other people decide in such a critical situation, we might as well be dead before we get to a decision. I don't think social distancing would be feasible in church. But if you go ahead and go to church, just because you have rights, you're putting others in danger too.

It's not rocket science. You only need common sense.
JBird · F
@Budwick [quote]
your screenshot isn't relative to religion, swimming or crocodiles.
[/quote]
🤦 What's with your attitude? Are you acting stupid or are you actually stupid?
JBird · F
@Budwick [quote]
The reference to pissing in your Cheerio's is an idiom, not to be taken so literally.
[/quote]
Did say I taken it seriously? 🤪

So answer to your question, it's not an attitude. I mean I don't know if saying truth is equivalent to 'having attitude's in your country. 😬
Budwick · 70-79, M
@JBird [quote]Did say I taken it seriously? [/quote]

What you said was -
[quote]Typical 'mericans, thinking everyone eats Cheerios for breakfast.[/quote]

NO, you definitely have an attitude going on.
I respect truth. I honer honesty.
I've gotten none of that from you.
Just attitude.
4meAndyou · F
I heard someone speaking on the news the other day, and I thought he had a very valid point. Walmart and Costco are allowed to be open, with masks and social distancing...(and social distancing is not even happening). There is NO crowd control at those places...and people just crowd in to the stores in any number they please. 3000 people a day go into those stores, touching everything.

If THAT is okay, what in heaven's name is wrong with opening up churches, with masks and social distancing? Eating is considered essential for survival...so I understand that food stores have to be open. But Democrat states are keeping churches closed while liquor stores and abortion clinics are allowed to be open...and I can't even get surgery on my extremely painful hand and wrist. I've been waiting since March and have had two doctors appointments cancelled.

So why...why in heck is sitting 6 feet apart, wearing a face mask, in church, different than groping through the coolers for your beer in the liquor stores and a thousand people all touching the same handles?
SweetMae · 70-79, F
@4meAndyou You do have some very good arguments for opening churches!!
JesseInTX · 51-55, M
Whether they’re essential or not people should have the right to go worship with their congregation of they wish to. Just as they should be able to go to a restaurant. Or to a vacation home. Or the beach. Or the lake. If you don’t feel comfortable then stay home. But just because you stay home shouldn’t mean I have to as well.
JoePourMan · 61-69, M
@JesseInTX excellent points
BlueVeins · 22-25
If there were a benevolent god, he would want people to protect themselves from this virus and love each other from a distance.
AnneHoney · 36-40, F
Again you played the delusional card and now insulted my intellect. an ass is used to carry heavy loads which you clearly are when you assume only delusional people have an opinion that differs from yours.

The Bible says God the Father. Jesus history says was a man. So he seems a reasonable pronoun to use when discussing God. @BlueVeins
BlueVeins · 22-25
@AnneHoney I didn't just call that lady delusional, I [i]provided evidence[/i] that she was delusional. You're not seriously going to defend someone who thinks that worship makes you impenetrable to pathogens, right? It's ok for someone to have a different opinion, but there's such a thing as objective reality and facts.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@AnneHoney [quote]The Bible says God the Father. Jesus history says was a man. So he seems a reasonable pronoun to use when discussing God.[/quote]

[i]woosh[/i]
revenant · F
To make it simple : the left wants to get rid of religion altogether
AnneHoney · 36-40, F
That isn’t remotely true. @Quizzical
Quizzical · 46-50, M
@AnneHoney Well, it's MY definition of sense
JoePourMan · 61-69, M
@revenant especially Christianity
people are so fucking stupid :) it's hopeless for us because a few people refuse to alter their own behavior under the guise that they are "saved" by an invisible creation of their own mind, be it god or youth or just because someone in their family isn't affected yet
SW-User
No. They are not. Even the Bible says that churches really mean nothing
SW-User
@AnneHoney Also, the original language of the Bible, it never really mentions church. Church was actually the Greek word " ekklesia" which means "calling out".

So, Peter was the rock of those who call out to God in the original not the rock of the church in the translated English. Jesus also worshipped outside of the temple many times. He made it a point that you don't need church to be with God.

So, based on Biblical evidence, church is not essential since you can worship and be close with God anywhere.
AnneHoney · 36-40, F
@SW-User based on your picking out a few verses and deciding that is what they mean to you. Then don’t attend. No one said you should.
SW-User
@AnneHoney I'm not saying churches are bad, I'm just saying that even Jesus would deem churches as non-essential.

There are many verses in the Bible that I could use but to Christians, these two are the most well known.

I also still go to religious services and like to learn about different religions.
SW-User
No. You can pray to God at home, listen to the word on religious channels, listen to gospel or hymns, etc. God won’t strike you down all because you can’t praise him in a sanctuary.
SW-User
If they can safely maintain the same social distancing requirements that other businesses and institutions must maintain, I don't see why churches should be treated differently.
AnneHoney · 36-40, F
Very reasonable answer@SW-User
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
There's only one Church that is essential, and that is, the Church that Jesus Christ has established Himself.
Ryannnnnn · 31-35, M
They might be to some people. But yes everyone should be allowed to decide for themselves.
revenant · F
I do not go to church but who am I to tell a churchgoer, or mosque, synagogue etc goer not to go ?
If I felt for my safety, it is UP TO ME not to go or associate with that person.
Booze stores are left open no ?
who am I to tell someone what is and what is non essential for them
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
Essentially useless , much like the mugs that frequent them.

What America needs is more prayer says President Shit Heel , right on the back of Republican polling that shows a double digit drop in support amongst Catholics , Protestants and Evangelicals.

He's fucking shitting himself.
SweetMae · 70-79, F
They are essential to people of faith. It is a convenient place to gather.

They would seem unnecessary to those that believe differently.
AnneHoney · 36-40, F
That is why those that don’t attend are so willing to deny rights to others. And those that do fight so hard to keep their rights.@SweetMae
SweetMae · 70-79, F
@AnneHoney It is a constitutional right to worship freely. I'm not sure if that right extends to places of worship. I do think it was the founding fathers intention at the time.
AnneHoney · 36-40, F
Seems clear to me. Congress shall not RESTRICT THE FREE PRACTICE THERE OF @SweetMae if your practice is attending a church it can not be prevented. The only argument is the not yelling fire in a theater argument which restricts free speech. It took the Supreme Court ruling to allow that one.
eMortal · M
Churches can stay closed.
No traffic, no donation therefore bankrupting pastors. 😂
Churches are not essential. You can pray at home, maybe with a group of friends if you insist.
TexChik · F
@eMortal sorry tard ... stay home all you want , go bankrupt , and dry up and blow away . Churches are open , deal with it.
eMortal · M
@TexChik lol
MistyStarr · F
I don't believe churches are essential as we can talk to God anywhere.
AnneHoney · 36-40, F
Then don’t go. Some people want to do more than talk to God.@MistyStarr
MistyStarr · F
@AnneHoney I don't go. Each to their own. I'm not going to argue about it. You asked a question and l replied.
revenant · F
Yes for some people. Amazing what people want to dictate for others.
FreeSpirit1 · 51-55, F
Not to me, but I'm sre they are to others.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
No. Skipping over the irresponsible acts of some preachers claiming they can crue or grant Immunity, the social distance isnt about just the flock. It is about every other contact the flock members have. So their responsibility is to the Community. God will just have to understand.
Chevy454 · 46-50, M
No. Never were
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This message was deleted by its author.
TexChik · F
@spjennifer
Sorry libtard, facts dont lie. But liberals certainly do.
AnneHoney · 36-40, F
@spjennifer I like your suit and shoes. You shouldn’t hide your face.
JoePourMan · 61-69, M
@TexChik great chart!

 
Post Comment