This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Budwick · 70-79, M
[quote] is it necessary to know how life ultimately began in order to study and debate the evidence that evolution has since occurred?[/quote]
Apparently not. Proponents of evolution are constantly trying to jam the beginning and evolution down the throats of Creationists.
Personally, I think the evolutionists think they have Creationists by the short hairs, cuz they think they have an answer for everything. They think they are at least as smart or smarter than God.
This post like so many other 'scientific' posts is really a veiled attack on those that believe in God.
Apparently not. Proponents of evolution are constantly trying to jam the beginning and evolution down the throats of Creationists.
Personally, I think the evolutionists think they have Creationists by the short hairs, cuz they think they have an answer for everything. They think they are at least as smart or smarter than God.
This post like so many other 'scientific' posts is really a veiled attack on those that believe in God.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Budwick [quote]Apparently not[/quote]
As we have now seen... [i]definitely[/i] not
Which answers the OP’s question.
Well, at least [i]that’s[/i] settled.
As we have now seen... [i]definitely[/i] not
Which answers the OP’s question.
Well, at least [i]that’s[/i] settled.
@Budwick
[quote]This post like so many other 'scientific' posts is really a veiled attack on those that believe in God.
[/quote]
I think you're being a little over sensitive there, guy.
This was not an attack, veiled or otherwise. It was a legitimate discussion point which arose from real interactions with creationists.
You've actually done the best of all of them by actually answering the question.
And correctly too, i might add👍
[quote]This post like so many other 'scientific' posts is really a veiled attack on those that believe in God.
[/quote]
I think you're being a little over sensitive there, guy.
This was not an attack, veiled or otherwise. It was a legitimate discussion point which arose from real interactions with creationists.
You've actually done the best of all of them by actually answering the question.
And correctly too, i might add👍
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Budwick As I said... the question is settled.
Asked and answered.
Abiogenesis and evolution are two separate topics
Asked and answered.
Abiogenesis and evolution are two separate topics
Budwick · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 Yeah, I heard you the first time.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Pikachu [quote]I'm still not sure how you can characterize this as an attack.
[/quote]
Let me explain the obvious to you Cartoon Boy.
The sole purpose of your post is to find Believers for you to berate. You do it all the time - others see it too and that's why I'm calling you out on it.
[/quote]
Let me explain the obvious to you Cartoon Boy.
The sole purpose of your post is to find Believers for you to berate. You do it all the time - others see it too and that's why I'm calling you out on it.
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Pikachu A difference of opinion - is that all it is?
I think it's fascinating that you write posts like this, once or twice a month. In each one you and sometimes one of your science pals end up ganging up on some Christian that offered up his / her 'difference of opinion'.
Even now, you are making me out to be some kind of bad guy for having the gall to be offended by your badgering of Christians.
I think it's fascinating that you write posts like this, once or twice a month. In each one you and sometimes one of your science pals end up ganging up on some Christian that offered up his / her 'difference of opinion'.
Even now, you are making me out to be some kind of bad guy for having the gall to be offended by your badgering of Christians.