Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should religions be immune to scientific scrutiny? [Spirituality & Religion]

Wraithorn · 51-55, M
No, especially when religion causes harm. Example : Jehovah's Witnesses who refuse their dying children blood transfusions because of their religion.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
What makes you think science is a superior method of scrutiny?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Celine Sucks to be you. It is in the news today. Look it up. Science is a religion. Get used to it.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JP1119 · 36-40, M
Religions are inherently immune to scientific scrutiny. Religion is not just a collection of stories, it's about what you worship, what you value the most. Science can prove that some stories sacred to a given religion are not literally true, but science has nothing to say about whom or what you should worship.
They kind of are in the sense than any religious person ignores all scientific facts despite how damning they may be.
@JP1119 Then they aren't really religious. If you believe in science you can't believe in religion because science discredits everything you believe.
JP1119 · 36-40, M
@GreenGoddess First of all, everyone is religious. Being religious is part of the human condition. What I mean is that everyone is constantly changing according to their own perceived ultimacy. In short, everybody worships something.

I am a Christian. Science cannot prove that God doesn't exist. I believe the scientific fact, for example, that the world is millions of years old, not just a few thousand years old as one might believe if they interpreted the Bible literally.

That doesn't mean I'm not a Christian, here's why: I believe that the Bible was written by imperfect human hands and may contain some (especially scientific and historical) errors. Furthermore, I don't interpret the Bible strictly literally, I believe where it says that the world was created in "seven days" that that doesn't necessarily mean seven twenty-four hour periods, each of those "days" may actually mean perhaps thousands or even millions of years. Finally, I believe that the Bible was not meant to be a book of science or history, it was meant to be a spiritual guide to living your life, so I can read a science book when I want to learn science and read the Bible to help me make important life decisions.
Fair enough ☺.
Firespirit · 26-30, M
Well since religion is belief without proof if they started using scientific method it would stop being religion
why is the scientific community so interested in debunking religion.. shouldn't they be curing cancer and shit?..
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@Celine no. ive noticed you dont like answers that dont correlate .. :)
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
TheConstantGardener · 56-60, M
Religions should but their beliefs should not.
What if we [i]call[/i] it science? Then we can say it is above scrutiny. Works for atheists

 
Post Comment