Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

FBI investigation of Trump Russia ties continues now with an uncompromised leader ...

....... perhaps an independent special prosecutor will be added. Comey who was alleged to be out to get Mrs Clinton and favor President Trump is gone. Investigation is totally devoid of any taint. Still the Dems complain ..... huh?
Heartlander · 80-89, M
Democrats and their media stooges are so heavily invested in the Trump-Russian thing that they will take it to their political graves. As long as they perpetuated the idea of a collusion between Trump and Putin, they kept the attention away from Hillary Clinton's mishandling of classified information.

It's pretty obvious from Comey's behavior that he was attempting to tiptoe around the Clinton e-mail scandal as well as tiptoe around whatever mischief the Obama DOJ had cooked up against Trump. With him out of the way, the DOJ can now assess Hillary's as well as Obama DOJ behavior for criminal misconduct.

Expect the Democrats to try throwing the kitchen sink at Trump as he fulfills that campaign promise about draining the swamp.
Northwest · M
Problem is that the President has been tweeting, consistently, that the Russia probe is a waste of taxpayers money.

The Democrats are not unhappy to see Comey go, they're simply laughing at the absurdity of the justification. Did you read the official memo?

Fired for making derogatory remarks about Hillary Clinton? It would be comical if it wasn't so sad.

derogatory remarks about Hillary Clinton? The Quicken Loans Arena, in Cleveland, still echoes with chants of "lock her up".

I would be thrilled to see an INDEPENDENT special prosecutor in charge, but I doubt this will happen. Kellyanne Conway, was brought back out to get the spin going.

This should not be a partisan issue, so why are you framing it as such?
Northwest · M
@Jackjjacksonjr: I've seen this (not on CNBC), so the analysis is not out yet.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/10/news/economy/cbo-obamacare-gop-health-bill/

The 10% reduction is a somewhat meaningless figure, because it uses as a basis a law that was going to evolve, so it would be comparing apples to oranges. What would be more meaningful, is comparing it to what was projected to be proposed under the Hillary plan (ACA version 2).

I don't think the ACA was the right overall solution, but I think it was a good start toward eliminating some of the major issues: pre-existing conditions, and caps. In my heart of hearts, we would have a single risk pool for the entire country, that insurance countries can opt into, and then provide individual insurances policies. No one should die, because they cannot afford medical attention.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Northwest:

I've come around to favoring a single payer system. My view I'd those that pay get a version of Medicare and those that don't get Medicaid.

Everyone covered in some form. By pay I mean taxes which replace employer based or private policies.

All the competing private plan rules, dupicstive administrstion, and shareholder and executive profits take unnecessary dollars out of the system. Never thought I would come to this viewpoint. However the bastardized ACA and whatever would amend or replace it has to cost more and provide less than signed payer.

Lifetime caps and pre existing conditions should remain things of the past. Those who want more than this new Medicare would have the option of trying to get more with supplemental insurance.

This isn't brain surgery. It's a question of blowing off health insurance company lobbyists.
Northwest · M
@Jackjjacksonjr: Insurance companies seem to love the proposed plan, because it gives them a better opportunity to influence at the state level.
i just read comey got the sack .. is that true.. hilldawg and barrys noose just got tighter..
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@theoneyouwerewarnedabout: Yes. He was fired
bet a few ppl on the hill a sweating now ;D
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@theoneyouwerewarnedabout:

Lots of miscreants lots of places sweating now. Boo hoo.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Yates and clapper laughing stock
katielass · F
good god Jack, this "investigation" has been going on since last July, so they said. They also said they can pull up surveillance of a particular person so why is this being dragged out? They all keep saying there is no evidence of collusion so listen to the damn calls and be done with it. I know why the dems want this dragged out but they are not about to drag this out for 4 years. The people won't stand for it.
katielass · F
@Jackjjacksonjr: I am absolutely in favor of that. when I heard chuck schumer this afternoon talking about how the American people will never have confidence in our justice system again unless we have a special prosecutor, I knew immediately that that was the solution. comey has just compromised himself to the point his own dept doesn't back him. so we need a special prosecutor who will reopen the Hillary email investigation and continue the trump campaign collusion investigation. As schumer said the people will not be able to have faith in our judicial system unless we do this. so lets get the show on the road.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@katielass:



It will end with another round of Schumer crying 😂
katielass · F
@Jackjjacksonjr: No doubt. He has got to be one of the most boorish people in the US. You might recall him blasting comey for the letter in late October and today he was trying to infer that comey was fired because "he knows something".

 
Post Comment