rational reasoned argument or large bombs. What are the relative merits of the Mandela and Trump approaches to leadership?

I'm just guessing we're leaving out the whole "necklacing" thing in the name of nonsensical loaded questions?

Arguably, it depends on who the enemy is, and the objective. Mandela was dealing with an enemy (the minority white population) whom he would have to continue working and living with. Trump's stated enemy, ISIS was someone whom our country wanted destroyed.