What are the criteria for proving that a vote was false or fraudulent?

@MistyCee Bingo! That's Trump's MO. He creates his own alternative reality, and his sycophants and Cult members desperately try to find ways to support that alternative. Many times it is ludicrous, but it doesn't dissuade them.

@windinhishair Not sure where you are going with this except to try to make it look impossible, where did I say 100% of voters in Philly voted in that precinct? I didn't. I said his precinct covered an area with 22% of the voters in Philly. If you take 22% of 749,000, that is roughly 150,000, and if you discount the mail in ballots, it would be considerably less than that.

The elephant in the room is all the mail in ballots that came to polling places in the dead of night without going through the post office.

I think there are enough examples of voter fraud to investigate and fix the problems. In PA Biden "won" by 8500 votes, the 150K from that precinct in Philly may have determined the statewide election results in a national election.

It seems that you think it should be ignored, in the last two presidential elections both losing candidates have stated that they believed there was election fraud, one a democrat and one a republican. It is a truly bipartisan issue. There were plenty of democrats calling for investigations when Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, claims that Trump wasn't a legitimate winner, it spawned the "Not my President" rhetoric.

The article that said Demuro's area covered 22% of the vote was in the Washington Post and in a local Philly paper.

@Roadsterrider I used the percentages you provided, which are so ridiculous that it is obvious it couldn't happen. I did not use 100% of the vote cast on election day, just 22% as you alleged. If I used the total vote, it would be even more ridiculous

There were no secret ballots streaming in from everywhere. Those spurious allegations were reviewed by the courts and were laughed out because there was no evidence whatsoever of it occuring. Random people on the internet isn't evidence. Court filings without evidence, as in this situation, don't go anywhere.

And now I see you are making up more data--Biden did not win by 8500 votes. Biden won by 80,555 votes in PA. You can choose to lie about it, but that's the margin.

Democrats were not claiming voter fraud in 2016 as the Trump Cult was in 2020. They were claiming Russian influence, which was proven, but not voter fraud. You don't have to continue to make things up. Voter fraud is not a major issue and is not influencing national elections. I already gave you the voter fraud instances documented in this election. A total of three were in PA.

Please provide the link saying that 22% of all the vote in Philly was in a single precinct out of the 1703 in the City. You can't do it because it didn't happen.

In summary, everything you just said was wrong and without evidence. But keep trying. Maybe if you keep lying to yourself and others, you will start to believe it.

@Roadsterrider Here is a link to the 2020 election data for Philadelphia (and other elections going further back in time). You'll notice that in no precincts did Biden or Trump receive even 1000 votes, let along 22% (roughly 150,000) of the votes cast. You can search the data if you like. It is an excel file.

https://www.philadelphiavotes.com/en/resources-a-data/ballot-box-app.html

@Pitchblue As usual, Republican accusations are confessions.

@LeopoldBloom Texas has more Democratic voters than Republicans, but long-term voter suppression has entrenched the Republican majorities in State and Federal offices.

@hippyjoe1955 Burden of proof is on the claimant, as always.
[quote]In the mean time as my old high school used to say the first person who resorts to profanity loses the debate. You lose.[/quote]
Aww, sweetheart, this isn't highschool. No one fucking cares if we swear.

@OggggO I don't care what language you use either. I just know that if you have to resort to profanity you are no longer worthy of debate. You haven't got a clue and it shows in your choice of language.

@hippyjoe1955 I don't [i]have[/i] to resort to profanity, I just [i]chose[/i] to because it gets the damn point across. It's called emphasis.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow They don't need proof they need an idol.

@FreestyleArt I believe the term is called clutching at straws.

@Callmewhatyouwill well since they obviously haven’t found any signs of voter fraud that would tell me that there isn’t any. Also I would imagine if there was that it would make huge headlines and would be reported by every news organization.

@justanothername they're still doing the audit and said from the beginning they wouldn't announce anything until they were done.

You may want to get more informed about the topics you're talking about.

@Callmewhatyouwill I call it clutching at straws. Trying to build suspense to something that doesn’t actually exist.