This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
WSEIII · 51-55, M
I think a permanent ban would violate his free speech.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@WSEIII Why? He has no absolute right to be on a private company's website any more than anyone else does.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@WSEIII If Facebook was the property of the nation you would be gorrect. But it isnt and you arent. As a legal company they can set standards and rules of behaviour as they wish, as long as they violate no laws in doing so. And they are allowed to have a "No Bigoted lying @$$holes" Rule if they wish.