So...no national healthcare?

@KrackerBash Isn’t it ? Science is about the how and whys of life, technically speaking. Arguably, religion has been about the hows and whys philosophically. 🤔

I stand by my statement. Yours is accurate. They do not contradict.

Science never stops pursuing new evidence.
@bijouxbroussard

@KrackerBash I concede. I should have said sound scientific evidence. I will edit.

@KrackerBash More Horseshit !

@Picklebobble2 I’d rather you prove me wrong than shout “horseshit”. Not really offering me much to consider, Pickle.

@KrackerBash [quote]Establishing fact is not the business of science [/quote] That’s [b]exactly[/b] what science is !

@Picklebobble2 Care to quote that from a science journal or academic source? If you can, we’ll have something to talk about. Otherwise, what you’re experiencing is cognitive dissonance.

@KrackerBash Just for the sake of finding your level of understanding, explain why you make this presumption ?
Because it’s unfathomable

@Picklebobble2

You can find explanations of what science is and seeks to do all over the web. You’ll find support for my claim. What you won’t find, and I encourage you to prove me wrong, is that the business of science is to come to concrete and unquestionable conclusions.

Some examples supporting my positions (with source links):

• No scientific idea is ever once-and-for-all "proved." https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/whatisscience_04
• Many people accept the misconception that science is capable of providing proof. The reality is that science deals in probabilities, not proofs. https://thelogicofscience.com/2016/04/19/science-doesnt-prove-anything-and-thats-a-good-thing/
• Science is the [i]pursuit[/i] of knowledge about ourselves and the world around us. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41698375

@KrackerBash NONE of which explains your statement.

@Picklebobble2 All of them do. You’ll understand if and when you’re ready to question your own unfounded fallacies.

@SW-User Again, find a scientific/academic journal, research-based website, or any scientific reference that even loosely claims science establishes facts.

If the direct quotations from my references are not understandable to you, I really don’t think you’re ready to let go of whatever biases you’ve formed your paradigm around.

@SW-User I ask for one thing.

Support your position, with any reference, or just stop. I’m not impressed. @SW-User