Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Pennslyvania SOS was wrong and lacked authority to change rules?(Edited because I worded that complete wrong originally)

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsylvania-court-secretary-of-state-changed-deadline
Northwest · M
Let's decipher this.

The Supreme Court ruled that this should be looked at after the elections, and in the meanwhile, it decreed that any ballots received after Nov 3rd, as well as those that are subject to the PA Sec. of State (GOP) two day extension, must be set aside and not counted. This was further clarified by judge Alito, when Trump woke him up late on election night, and he issued another memo saying that these ballots must be set aside and not counted.

The Supremes at the time opined that while they don't have the time to rule on it, it seemed clear to them that the State's Supreme Court had no authority to extend the deadline, that's a job for the Legislature.

So, this was widely expected, and furthermore, it does NOT change anything. All it means is that these 10,000 or so ballots will not be counted. So they will not be counted for Trump and will not be counted for Biden.

So, for those keeping track, Biden, today, as more VALID ballots were counted, expanded his lead in PA to 54,592 votes, confirming what PA Republican Senator said last night: this does not change anything.
Northwest · M
@Carla The ballots have never been counted, but it's a win for Trump 🤣

[quote]the whole thing is moot in the large picture?[/quote]

Not in the large picture, or any picture :-)

This was a big issue for the GOP when Trump was leading PA and before absentee ballots, that came in by election day, were counted. When Biden took the lead, it became a moot point. This has more to do with internal GOP politics. The Sec. of State is GOP and she's fighting with the State Legislature, which is GOP. The Governor is a Democrat, but staying out of this thing. The State's GOP Senator (the other is a Democrat), said last night that this was a moot point.
OggggO · 36-40, M
@Northwest Do you have sources that I can read?
Northwest · M
@OggggO For the Supreme Court ruling? Or today's court ruling?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsylvania-court-secretary-of-state-changed-deadline

and this is the actual court order today:

https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2020/11/602-MD-2020-Order-Nov.-12.pdf

This is the SCOTUS summary:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/justice-alito-orders-pennsylvania-officials-to-separate-ballots-that-arrived-after-election-day

Bottom line, is that all these ballots have been "sequestered" and not counted. Now they are not going to be counted at all. No effect on the results.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
This covers a small number of votes that weren't corrected over a period of a couple of days after November 6. It won't change anything about the election at all.
Human1000 · M
@windinhishair I’ve read three reports its not enough...I sure hope that’s right. They voted before Nov 4. What kind of asshole opposes this...
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Human1000 Apparently it is only votes cast before November 4 where the voter was told there was an issue with their ballot (e.g., non-matching signature, stray marks, etc.) AND they didn't come correct it by the end of the day November 6 AND did correct it by November 9. That's a very small number of votes, and could have involved Trump votes as well as Biden votes. But Trump has nothing left to go on, so this is the latest Hail Mary. The bottom line is that he doesn't want voters to vote unless they vote for him.
OggggO · 36-40, M
Okay, now that you have rewritten the question, I believe I can answer. According to the court, the SOS was wrong, however, it seems they weren't trying to change the rules, only clarify them, and the court has said their clarification was in error and instead provided a judicial ruling on the meaning of the rules.
Northwest · M
This was expected and does not change the outcome. We’re talking about a small portion of 10k ballots.
Adaydreambeliever · 56-60, F
Fox news??? Well, let's face it they are hardly in touch with reality
OggggO · 36-40, M
I'm not entirely sure how you got that headline from that article.
Beautifullyderanged · 36-40, F
@OggggO you're right, I worded it completely wrong, thank you for pointing it out, will fix.
Human1000 · M
All Republicans do. They aren’t big fans of voting.
Adaydreambeliever · 56-60, F
@Human1000 or democracy, or freedom it seems.
Human1000 · M
Freedom to kill others via COVID...they love that.@Adaydreambeliever
SW-User
Did they ever say how many ballots are waiting identification?
Beautifullyderanged · 36-40, F
@SW-User not in the text part of the article, there might be something in the audio part
SW-User
@Beautifullyderanged wow. PA really is up for grabs.

It seems like there are ~40k mail votes yet to be counted. ~15k provisional votes on each side.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@SW-User Biden is ahead by over 53,000 votes, and the margin is increasing. He's not in danger of losing the state even if all provisional ballots and mail votes went for Trump, which they won't.

 
Post Comment