Don't impeach for an impeachable offense?

Not all impeachable offenses warrant removal from office. Clinton's did not, for example. But the process of removal in the Senate is there to remove the president when his actions indicate that he is a danger to the institution of the presidency and to the nation. In Trump's case, this is clearly true. If ever there was a president that warranted removal by the Senate, it is this one. Trump will see and promote this as total vindication, and will blatantly abuse the power of the office even more, and in more egregrious ways. Unfortunately, this story isn't ending. It is only beginning.

I get this, and it makes a whole lot of sense, except for the obstruction stuff and the greenlight it gives him to commit even more impeachable offenses knowing he won't get removed or really even impeached again.

1. I believe this person should be removed from the Oval Office. (just my personal opinion)

2. I think it's the job of the American [u]people[/u] to remove him, not some tribunal. That's why there are elections, in a democracy.

Translation:

The president is now above all laws including the constitution.

This [i]does[/i] make perfect sense to me. What happened is [i]absolutely[/i] impeachable, and it’s important that the potus got impeached. Is actually removing him necessary or even helpful? I don’t think so, the disruption is not commensurate with the level of emergency here.

Rubio is on point here.

What exactly are the standards for impeachment?

It's all just a scam

You think some people are above the law?

Rubio is another whiny sore loser!

Rubio is the most craven of them all.