Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Liberals head are gonna explode yo.

😂😂

Consider it a twist on the old question about a tree falling in the forest with no one to hear it: If the House adopts articles of impeachment but never sends them to the Senate, is a president truly impeached?

A Harvard law professor, who also served as a Democrat-called impeachment witness, answered with a resounding “no” in a column that speaks to the deep dilemma House Speaker Nancy Pelosi faces as she sits on two articles of impeachment against President Trump.
Carissimi · 70-79, F
I heard that today. It’s ridiculous. The whole thing was a political game for nothing other than to make Trump look like a criminal to sway the election. It’s a gross abuse of power.
htoad34 · 36-40, M
@Heartlander What really boils my blood about the whole thing is, they go quoting founding fathers like they actually care about the constitution while at the same time blantantly ignoring the constitution, setting the precedent that anyone and everyone (except Democrats) are guilty until proven innocent. Even then the accused aren't allowed a fair trial! It truly is disgusting what they have done.
Carissimi · 70-79, F
@htoad34 It’s disgusting the way they misuse the Constitution. The Founding Fathers are turning in their graves.
Heartlander · 80-89, M
@htoad34 Notice how they ignored the part about "tyranny of the majority" (AKA mob rule) that Madison expressed.
curiosi · 61-69, F
Mitch should declare case closed. If Nancy wont sent the articles over then there is nothing to do but forget about the whole thing.
@curiosi No. We need to rub it in the proglodytes (todays democrats) faces, and we need to put some serious multi-generational shame into them for this shit! They need to come to their fecking senses. Otherwise you just have half the country with serious mental illness.
@curiosi Ya can 't muck the stable with the horses still in it!
Puckism 90
curiosi · 61-69, F
@puck61 These are the same morons who think "Cuz I don't like him is a reason to impeach" and if you didn't like Obama it's because you are racist. They are too stupid to get it.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@Heartlander This was the biggest 'shot in the foot' these neodems have done yet! I love em!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@MasterLee .....Wait for........................[i]The shot in the foot heard round the world![/i]
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@puck61 count on a new planned shooting to take the heat off the house
They are hesitant because the impeachment is an insult to jurisprudence. This is the first impeachment where the grounds for impeachment were that the legislators of one party did not like the president because he was not a member of their party. "I don't like you." is not grounds for impeachment and hopefully the proglodytes won't be able to set that precedent.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
I believe the law says impeachment is the actual vote in the house. No matter what happens it is on the record.

Now the next congress, likely Republican, can vote to expunge it.
TexChik · F
@MasterLee if the congress goes into its next term without the articles being referred to the senate, then its done...
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@sunsporter1649 no just impeachment. It is a pretty meaningless bill without the trial though.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@TexChik maybe but the act of impeachment is purely political theater.
akindheart · 61-69, F
ha ha...the joke is on the squad and pelosi
SW-User
He may have been impeached by the house but the senate will never impeach him so we will have him another 4 yesrs
SW-User
@Zonuss have you seen any of his rally’s
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@SW-User Have you seen the protests. The people around the globe who hate Trump. I see why people call y'all deplorables. 🤭
SW-User
@Zonuss yes the ones who hate trump are stupid as hell and very violent I’d have to pack heat if I were to go that mess
SW-User
Yes. Just like if a grand jury indicts someone, that person is still indicted even if the case has not gone to trial yet.
SW-User
@hippyjoe1955 Then that makes Trump the guilty one here. He feared his witnesses were going to commit perjury and blocked/ told them from testifying. Even if they did not commit perjury, that was still a bad move on Trump's part. There was no need for Trump to say he did not have due process because he blocked witnesses from testifying before the inquiry to defend him.
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 He did it because he has something to hide.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955 LOL ,yes, as we all know, guilty until proven innocent. Its the American way, right?
I don't see a downside to sending it to the Senate. If they dismiss it the GOP sends a clear message to the electorate that they put the cult of Trump over their oaths, above law, and above their nation.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@PainfulTruth I smell another cover-up coming....
SW-User
Okay...this is really getting ridiculous. I really wish you Liberals/conservatives/Democrats/Republicans would grow the hell up and stop acting like kids. All this is just a game to make one another look bad, and instead it's making the entire U.S. look bad. Just put your differences aside for gosh sakes.
@SW-User Hell, it's a little late for that, we're about six months away from guerrilla warfare.
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@puck61 Like you care. You're a charlatan
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@Stereoguy And that's the whole point. You're so fu of hate what's right and wrong doesn't matter anymore. That's why you're culture.is dying.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@Stereoguy I don't condone taking prayer out of schools.
4meAndyou · F
It's a technicality.

The Senate will end up going to trial without the articles, if necessary,if Trump insists and if that is what Trump really wants.

I've heard some theories that Pelosi is just trying to delay so that the culmination of the trial will be in November 2020. (She must be praying for a Hail Mary if that's the case). AND I've heard that she is trying to delay so that the Senate Dems running for President can attend the Iowa Caucus.

I've also heard that she hopes the Senate dems running for President will be spiked by her delays, so that the socialists won't have as much campaign time as Biden and Butigieg.

It's anybody's guess why she is doing this, but if she hopes to influence the way the Senate conducts an impeachment trial she hasn't got a prayer.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@PainfulTruth she hit the bottle early
Northwest · M
You do realize that Pelosi NEVER said never, right? Which makes this post what? hint, if you said strawman, you would be right.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
I want to watch the psychosocialist proglodytes heads explode like this!
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMY9Yq0_6pU]
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Zonuss · 41-45, M
This is irrelevant. Thanks for wasting your time. 🙂
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Zonuss Kinda like the last three years of the democrats temper tantrum, right?
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649 You're the one exhausted defending Trump. 🤭
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Zonuss We are the ones laughing at the incompetence of the gang that could not impeach straight
strongbow · 46-50, M
Their heads been exploding for over 3 years now, and will be for another 5 years 🤭
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@puck61 It's just his base. Not impressed. 🙂
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@Zonuss yeah we are less than impressed by liberals
Heartlander · 80-89, M
@strongbow Liberals use children to front their assaults for the same reasons why Hamas and Taliban terrorist puts their rocket launchers next to schools and hospitals.

 
Post Comment