Why Rich USA Can't Afford Medicare for All but Has Spent $5.6 Trillion on War? This Article is...

MrBrownstone · 46-50, M Best Comment

[image deleted]

BlueVeins · 22-25

The bigger question is how we can afford privatized healthcare but not M4A when the former is much more expensive in practice.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

SW-User

Because improving the lives of people is socialism and we can’t have that. Plus some people in the U.S. would rather see another country destroyed than fix their own.

SW-User

I have no arguments. I live in the US and I am disgusted that we choose expensive foreign wars over the health and welfare of our own people.

TexChik · F

most dont want socialized medicine , 70% plus taxation , and loss of any choice in healthcare ...and it costs 72 Trillion ... not gonna happen

chrisCA · M

Now you stop with them thar commie ideas. 😏

CountScrofula · 41-45, M

Even if there was no military, the US could afford universal health care. The current system is WAY more expensive and inefficient than 'for all' plans.

AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M

It’s not that we can’t do it. It’s that we don’t want to allocate that many resources (dollars) to doing it.

eMortal · M

It's not that we can't afford Medicare for all. It's just that a lot of us are against that idea.

Powderflask · 31-35, M

I don't have a good answer for that 1. We spend and give away money that does not benefit tax payers it's a complete shame. However I'm also firmly against Medicare for all or Medicare in general. Why do people want to fund government control?

MarineBob · 56-60, M

Just look at nancy do you really want to see her doctors

MarmeeMarch · M

wisely spent over 19 years - thank you Mideast pigs !

Success · 26-30, F

Oh, my precious American firearms!

Human1000 · M

We’re idiots, okay?