What if Trump loses?

@Moodswings I think it was doomed long before him, but hey...

@TexChik but what if he doesn't that's what I was curious about so what if?

@SW-User there would have had to have been blatant ejection fraud for that to happen .... and it might actually lead to civil war . Red states don’t want their oil based economy ripped out from under them or to be over run with illegals or have Their guns confiscated .

@Graylight politics at it's finest

@Graylight perfect answer

@Dainbramadge Rock bottom the economy was not. Because Trump was elected in 2016, and not 2008. If he were then we would see how good he is, but as most people know he is not. 🙂

@Dainbramadge Rock bottom 😂

@QuixoticSoul That guy is always exaggerating. 😂

@xRedx Report, scandal. I didnt buy into it. You wet your clothes again. 🤭

@Zonuss Report isn't scandal, you donkey. The only wet clothes here are gonna be yours when Trump gets reelected 😂🤣

@xRedx You need diapers again. 🤭

@PainfulTruth fair view thank you for explaining

@BlueVeins Hillary failed because she isn’t a good politician, at all lol. Not because of her positions. Bernie or Warren can’t win outside of their liberal bubbles. Look at the midterms. We took back the house because of moderate candidates winning in swing districts. The extreme Democrats either lost or, if they did win, it was because they ran in an already very liberal district that any democrat would carry.
AOC couldn’t win in a suburban or rural district.

@JessJessYay It may be true that these left-wing democrats haven't gained broad support yet, but the policies Bernie is running on are generally supported by the vast majority of Americans. As soon as he's in the national debate with Trump and he gets to make his case to the public at large, it's gonna be bye-bye Donald. And Bernie's strategies are well-matched to Donald Trump's. Trump's core strategy is speaking in generalities and aiming for the throat. Sanders's core strategy is speaking a language of statistics and facts while [i]also[/i] aiming for the throat. Klobuchar and Buttigieg can't command the same level of attention from a crowd.

The mark of a successful politician is their ability to tell a story and provide a resolution. Obama's story was a story about communities that had been left behind in the progress of the '90s and early 2000's. Trump's story was a story about a liberal elite that had sold their country to the Chinese, and let Mexicans steal all of the jobs. His solution was to get rids of those liberals, cancel the deals, and banish those Mexicans. Bernie's story is about a generation of good Americans who had had their economic opportunity stolen from them by the billionaires, and his solution is to tax the shit out of the latter to provide services for the former. Clinton's story was about a fat man who sends racist Tweets and [i]that's[/i] why she lost. Buttigieg and Klobuchar are going to lose for basically the exact same reason. They're just not exciting.

@BlueVeins I agree with both sides of the left. The far left is right in that a vanilla establishment safe candidate doesn’t work. That’s been proven with Hillary, Kerry, Gore. BUT the moderate wing is correct in that far left candidates don’t win either. ie McGovern, Dukakis, or any on any national level. What win is a centrist pragmatic candidate, with charisma. So own outside Washington typically. With an ability to connect. Someone that bridges the gap between the far left and moderates. Like Bill Clinton and Obama. Both of whom were more moderate, but more left than the establishment. Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Mayor Pete all fit that mold really well.

@PainfulTruth That's completely false, as one person, even the President doesn't change an entire county like that...

America didn't suddenly change like that when anyone has won or loss. Everything is basically the same as from before Trump was President, other than some pills suggestions that some conservative areas might actually vote liberal for the first time in a long time (have to wait to see if polls are correct or not).

And that's certainly not what I want, but unless your biased, it's kinda easy to see Trump has done a bad job, as all he's done is been a PR guys for himself and a fairly questionable one at that.

@Moodswings Of course.

@Zonuss [quote]The World Order[/quote]

I see.

Funny, I would have thought that you would claim Trump to be part of the new world order conspiracy.

@Budwick Trump may not be part of it. But he is definitely rattling their feathers. And that is not good for anyone. Its gonna get worse. Just remember I told you so. 🙂

@Zonuss [quote]Trump may not be part of it. [/quote]

I wouldn't think he would take part in planning his own assassination.

But - you're the one that knows all / sees all.
Apparently you get the minutes of the new world order meetings.
[I KNEW I should have checked that off on that Publishers Clearing House magazine subscription thingy.]

@introvertguy Amen.

@JessJessYay I thought the question was what was going to happen if trump loses? That was what I answered.

@Kevin19 I’m assuming you support Trump, or at least conservatives policies, no?

@JessJessYay trump doesn’t even support conservative policies

@SW-User I have to agree with you. I honestly don't think anyone would want to shed blood over something like that.
I think the talk is just worry over a possible upheaval to what they feel comfortable with now.

@JT123 The farmers & banks didn't complain hun! 🤷‍♀️

@Heartlander What?! A reasonable, well thought out answer? Curious!

@fairefoutre 🤭

@SW-User probably not but he might try.

@Newfound hopefully not cause that sounds petty

@SW-User yep,

@DunningKruger you think it'll turn into a trump dynasty?

@SW-User No. The Trumps are just common criminals and are breathtakingly stupid. The rest of the oligarchy that benefits from this change will find someone less oblivious and divisive to serve as a figurehead.

@DunningKruger the next puppet?

@JAYS21 Ha ha ha!!! What [i]could [/i] possibly be referring to?? LOL

@SW-User Is it really?