Happy "Somebody Did Something" Day

@strongbow Amazing, is it not? Airplanes that fly all by themselves

@sunsporter1649 I guess we need to ban assault airplanes

@strongbow The 'airplanes took aim'?
All by themselves?
Must be like guns that have decided to shoot kids in schools and stuff.
And they dare call themselves journalists!

Jeepers, I hate the NYT as much as the phucking Taliban!

@strongbow Man, you guys are desperately looking for something to be angry about 😂

@QuixoticSoul So you are applauding?

@sunsporter1649 How are you this retarded?

@QuixoticSoul Yeah, maybe you;re right.
I mean, it was just some people doing something.
Why get angry? [dolt]

@QuixoticSoul You must be happy, since you are not angry about raghead terrorists killing innocent Americans

@sunsporter1649 You're out of your mind, man 😂

But no, I'm not angry at the NYT, no.

@QuixoticSoul How are you unable to see the obvious disregard for who actually attacked those buildings?
According to the NYT it was rogue airplanes!

@QuixoticSoul Of course, Sunsport didn't mention the NYT - did he?

You, just like the NYT ignored the terrorist blame.
Ilhan - is that you?

@Budwick Lmao you guys get so fucking nuts over this sort of wording, it's kind of adorable.

@QuixoticSoul LMAO, its amusing you guys are so supporting of those type of people

@sunsporter1649 Who am I supporting exactly? I'm just laughing at you guys for being hilarious drama queens tbh, that's not really an indication of support [i]for[/i] anything.

@QuixoticSoul[quote]Who am I supporting exactly?[/quote]
Rogue airplanes, of course!

@Budwick Nope, try again.

@QuixoticSoul Well, then who flew those planes into the buildings!

Oh, that's right, George Bush.

@Budwick Al Qaeda did, of course. So?

@QuixoticSoul So? That's your response? SO?

Do you at least see the grammatical error in blaming planes for the 9/11 attack? And, if you squint, face the East, can you imagine American citizens emotional over the tragic events of that day, with Ilhan's recent gaffe, and the NYT tirelessly trying to sink the Trump presidency that maybe, ... just maybe some might be pissed at the NYT failure to mention the terrorist responsibility for the slaughter of thousands of people?

Or, is it just no big deal to you?

@Budwick It's not a grammatical error, it's a figure of speech that's quite regularly used, and perhaps a way to reference the events without giving the credit to the terrorists, which is what they all desperately want. Kind of how NZ tries to celebrate the victims without naming so-and-so. Everyone knows who was responsible for 9/11, there is no need to inform the public at this point.

And 9/11 has [i]nothing[/i] to do with Trump either, dude, nothing. Neither do the Somalis, which is why you folks are proving Omar's point for her with all of this spazzing.

@QuixoticSoul Just because a lot of people make the same error is no excuse. The planes did NOT take aim. The terrorists aimed the planes.

Shame on you for providing cover for those bastards!

@Budwick It's not an error lmao - whenever the phrase "_____ (inanimate object) took aim at the _____" is used, you're not supposed to think that the _____ had its own volition for crying out loud.

Read more books smh

Oh no, cover 😂

[image deleted]
[b][big]?[/big][/b]

@QuixoticSoul

@jackjjackson You couldn't like, save or repost the image, screenshotting and scribbling was the way to go?