Politics & News

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do You Expect Mueller [the person] To Say Something Different Than The Mueller Report?

Two years, millions of dollars, hundreds of witnesses concluded with the Mueller Report indicating no collusion, no obstruction, no crime on the part of the president.

The left was devastated - just like they were on election night 2016. Now they are interrogating Robert Mueller, right now, as I write this post.

Do you think that there will be a different result than before?

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

AbbySvenz · F

No obstruction? Did we read the same report...? 🤔

View 50 more replies »

TexChik · F

@GJOFJ3 so that explains it!

GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M

@TexChik Bar mix, i.e. nutty lawyers.

TexChik · F

@GJOFJ3 😲... they’re not all nutty ... just the Libby ones .

RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M

If you knew [b]anything[/b] about the actual report then you would know it finds the direct opposite of 'no collusion , no obstruction'.

Stay tuned Bud , you might just learn something today.

View 28 more replies »

Platinum · M

@RodionRomanovitch there are two of us here that are making you look stupid, me and you....normal people would be proud to put where they come from and where they live, your profile is there for informing other members things about you and not a quiz....if I insulted you it was because insulted me as you did today ...you probably don't even know that you do insult others...you insult lots of people...you need help not me....

RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M

@Platinum I live in France. Did that possibility never even enter your tiny little mind ?

Platinum · M

Of course I knew you live in France , lucky English and unlucky French....but how would anyone know you were English if you write France ...you are too stupid to realize that....I know shall we go through everyone's profile and where they have put their country, we both have to guess where they come from....a couple of mates having fun...@RodionRomanovitch

akindheart · 61-69, F

did you get the feeling that mueller was in NAME ONLY and that he had nothing to do with the investigation? they used his name for credibility? he didn't know anything. he was so out of it, he had to have questions repeated. it was sad. the DEMS LOST big time

cherokeepatti · 61-69, F

@akindheart Either he was pretending to be clueless or he really was. I think he basically skimmed over and signed off on it. Or he didn’t want to say anything to implicate himself.

Heartlander · 80-89, M

@akindheart It's looking like Mueller went on a 2 year vacation and left all the work to his career (partisan) DOJ helpers.

You think maybe the FBI looks after their own first?

Budwick · 70-79, M

@akindheart I felt much the same way.
But the dems had felt they had their best and brightest on the job. At least they felt that way before yesterday.
And Nadler thinks everything went well yesterday - he's all set to impeach!

You know, it was cool and notable when the orchestra played on the deck of the Titanic as she sank. It meant something, it was dramatic. But, it doesn't play that way in this political situation. The hangers on look foolish.

AlienZipper · 61-69, M

No, despite what all the still sore losers on this site say to the contrary.

This is nothing more than a bunch of pissed off politicians wanting their pound of political flesh, and hell bent for leather to get it at all costs.

If Mueller doesn't give them the answers they WANT to hear, it won't stop. They've made up their minds about this, and won't be happy until Trump's head is in a metaphorical noose.

4meAndyou · F

@AlienZipper Jerry Nadler has already announced publicly that they plan to prosecute Trump as a private citizen after his Presidency ends.

EugenieLaBorgia · F

You know that there is that time in the life of a growing child called 'the terrible twos'. Thetime when the child stomps his or her little feet when they cannot get what they want; that time when they lie on the supermarket floor and refuse to get up because "Mommy won't buy me a candy and I want it!!" This is the left! Some parents might give the child a smack on the legs, others might just walk away until the tantrum dies out and some will just drag the child up by the scruff of the neck.

View 7 more replies »

Budwick · 70-79, M

@xixgun Gun - you look like Pepe Le Pew!

xixgun · M

@Budwick Tryin' to steal my gal! 🤠

xixgun · M

@Budwick Well, my last name is French, she's French... oo la la

cherokeepatti · 61-69, F

I have no idea but believe he and his minions are screwed. Sounds like his voice is shaky.

JT123 · M

Nope! Just more wasting of our money by the sore loser dems!

Heartlander · 80-89, M

I expect Democrats to continue to make fools of themselves.

Wraithorn · 51-55, M

I don't think so. I'm not American but I think it is well past time for American citizens to take back the power that they give to the politicians who insist on wasting so much tax money on this political circus.

GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M

This is kinda funny:

In just the first 90 minutes of the hearing, Mueller needed help understanding questions more than 10 times.

In one such exchange, Mueller — under questioning from Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.) — asked: “And where are you reading from on that?”

“I’m reading from my own question” the lawmaker reminded him.

“Then can you repeat it?” Mueller asked, eliciting laughter from the audience.

cherokeepatti · 61-69, F

@GJOFJ3 Plus how many times has he said “I’m not gonna get into that” or “I’m not going to answer that”???

xixgun · M

I'm just wondering how many times he will shoot himself in the back when he commits suicide.

GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M

It's a catch 22
If he say something different it discredits his entire report

If he says what the report says it discredits the investigation

MarineBob · 56-60, M

@GJOFJ3 if he says anything different a judge is standing by to sign a arrest warrant

GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M

@MarineBob for Mueller?

MarineBob · 56-60, M

@GJOFJ3 yes

daisymay · 51-55, T

[quote]"Does your report state there is sufficient factual and legal basis for further investigation of potential obstruction of justice by the President?" -- Lee

"Yes." -- Mueller[/quote]

Wow, so Trump lied about the contents of the report, too? Imagine that.

Budwick · 70-79, M

I'm gonna watch the movie [b][i][u]Jaws [/u][/i][/b]again.

This time I want the Captain and the shark to become friends and start a comedy / variety act like Jerry Lewis and Dean Martin

Heartlander · 80-89, M

If there's a benefit to all of this, it's that it will help us all understand what probably happened during the Spanish Inquisition.

4meAndyou · F

The whole point of today's show was to highlight what the Dems want to have highlighted, for those incapable of reading.

The Republicans also have their own agenda in highlighting irregularities, also for those incapable of reading.

The plan was to create a circus. However, I am upset at the amount of money the American taxpayers have had to PAY for a circus that is not entertaining, and is massively annoying.

katielass · F

No but have you noticed that whe questiond by a dumdum he knows exactly where in his report they are referring to, without being told, and he acts like a dottering old fool just wheeled in from the nursing home when questioned by a repub?

daisymay · 51-55, T

[quote]Rep. Jerry Nadler: "What about total exoneration? Did you actually totally exonerate the president?"

Robert Mueller: "No."[/quote]

Oh dear, how embarrassing for the Trumpansies.

View 7 more replies »

daisymay · 51-55, T

@Budwick Did you look up how obstruction is a crime and couldn't figure out a way to say it isn't? Sad.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@daisymay Mueller's performance is the most sad.
The future of democrat party equally sad.
Your intentional / willful ignorance, perhaps the most sad of all.

daisymay · 51-55, T

@Budwick Did you educate yourself about the crime or no?

hlpflwthat · M

Except for the part where there obviously[i][b] was[/b][/i] obstruction ... which last I looked [i][b]is[/b][/i] a crime 😏

Listen up Jcube - today's the day!

View 7 more replies »

Budwick · 70-79, M

@GJOFJ3 Good for them.
Maybe they'll find some common sense along the way.

[I know, I'm such a dreamer!]

GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M

@Budwick right next to the snowball in hell LOL

BizSuitStacy · M

@GJOFJ3 not surprising. As long as the democrats do not get the answer they want to hear, they will continue to re-ask the same question, over and over.

Heartlander · 80-89, M

What's so funny is how the very same people who said the police overstepped the line when they arrested Henry Louis Gates because there was no underlying crime are the very same people that say that whether or not there was an underlying crime, Trap is GUILTY!!

Back up a few more years and those same people all claimed it was OK for Clinton to lie about sex.

I think this is how the Spanish Inquisition worked.

GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M

@Heartlander I seem to remember a NY mag. article actually praising Pres Clinton as an unusually good liar. LOL

AlienZipper · 61-69, M

Orange Moron, Drumpf, Trumpansies, wompwomp? Really?

Doesn't surprise me that Trump haters resort to juvenile retorts.

View 5 more replies »

daisymay · 51-55, T

@AlienZipper [quote]If they treat you that way, they're wrong, but does that mean you have to return in kind. [/quote]

Yes, have you not heard of the Golden Rule?

[quote]But unless I'm mistaken, has Trump ever called you a name?[/quote]

Yeah, lots. "Traitor" is one. "America hater" is another. Shall I continue?

[quote]If you don't like him, that's your right, but using that term makes you look immature.
[/quote]
Duly noted. I'm sure sorry that I, alone, have dragged the discourse level of SW down. 🙄

Budwick · 70-79, M

@daisymay [quote] Shall I continue?

If you don't like him, that's your right, but using that term makes you look immature.
Duly noted. I'm sure sorry that I, alone, have dragged the discourse level of SW down. 🙄
[/quote]

Monikers well earned.

AlienZipper · 61-69, M

@daisymay

He's personally called you those names? And you enjoy being called those names?
And that justifies your responding in like manner?

Sorry, but that's a lame excuse for acting like a 10 year old.

So much for taking the high road then.

And there's many others besides you that contribute to dragging down political discourse on SW.

Too bad you can't - or won't - raise the bar when it comes to such matters.

raysam363 · 31-35, F

So was this another Mueller report along the lines of, "Well I can't say I found anything, but I also may have found something, but..."? Getting kinda sick of this. At this point it's a ploy to keep their jobs.

View 2 more replies »

daisymay · 51-55, T

@raysam363 [quote]Using gray-area terms and saying "well he could be convicted once he's out of office" isn't much[/quote]
Except that isn't the context. However, I'm talking about this, so deflection noted.

[quote]Rep. Adam Schiff: The Trump campaign officials built their messaging strategy around those stolen documents?

Mueller: Generally, that's true.

Schiff: And then they lied to cover it up?

Mueller: Generally, that's true. [/quote]

And

[quote]Robert Mueller confirmed that President Trump asked staff to falsify records relevant to the investigation[/quote]

----------------
[quote]I get it, you hate anything with even a speck of red in it[/quote]

So what? What does that have to do with the Orange Moron not being "totally exonerated"?

raysam363 · 31-35, F

@daisymay If he was guilty, he would have been impeached by both sides, that would have been a huge boost. Also, "Generally, that's true" is the biggest gray-area you can use. If he confirmed the falsification, they convict already.

daisymay · 51-55, T

@raysam363 [quote]If he was guilty, he would have been impeached by [b]both sides[/b][/quote]

That's bullshit and you know it.

Keep pretending that the Orange Moron did no wrong, or just finally embrace the fact that you don't care that he did.

Generally, in a general sense would mean that yes, almost without exception lies and cover-ups were happening.

If a conservative running their dog and pony show on the committee had any brains and agreed with you, they would hammer that and look for specific instances. Yet, they did not do that at all.

Weird.

I get it you hate anything with even a speck of truth in it.

You can consider our conversation concluded and you can have the last word, so get your best insult together and pretend that was the reason I'm done responding to you.

HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M

No. This is political theater

MarineBob · 56-60, M

No he's to smart for that

Platinum · M

Muller never struck me as someone who knew what he was talking about, he was very sheepish....

RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M

@Platinum You've always struck me as someone who has no idea what they are talking about too .... and , once again , you've confirmed that suspicion.

Platinum · M

@RodionRomanovitch why are you such an asshole, did you take exams or were you born stupid....

Thinkerbell · 41-45, F

@Platinum

"A sheep in sheep's clothing," to cite a well-known Englishman. 🤭

daisymay · 51-55, T

[quote]Trump ordered former White House counsel Don McGahn to lie, special counsel confirms.[/quote]

Can you say "obstruction", Bud? Did you know that obstruction of justice is a crime?

daisymay · 51-55, T

Budwick · 70-79, M

@daisymay Funny - very leftward biased, but funny

SW-User

This hearing isn’t going to move the needle for either side. The only way this has any impact is if Trump flies off the handle and Tweets something so completely outlandish that it opens something else up. For his sake, his staff should be keeping him busy with adult coloring books or anything else that diverts his attention from his television.

Heartlander · 80-89, M

@SW-User There is nothing that Trump can do now that would be more outlandish than what we've already seen from the squats or from Nadler. The only explanation I can come up with for their conduct is that they are attempting to distract from the crimes committed by Team Hillary and their plants in the Obama administration in their effort to un-elect Trump after the election.

AlienZipper · 61-69, M

@Heartlander

Yuppers

daisymay · 51-55, T

Someone was very worried about the investigation:

MistyCee

1. No.
2. Maybe. Going through the report on TV with it's author may influence people who haven't read it.

I do expect that the "indicating no ... obstruction, no crime" bit will get illuminated and explained, but I doubt it will make much of a difference to anyone who has read the report.

monte3 · 70-79, M

I don’t think the theatre will change any minds. Both sides will illuminate their talking points etc..
The one new, at least to me, is the allegation that Paul Manafort’s sharing polling data on the Midwest states to the Russians was to help them with the on line bot attacks.. it was subtle @MistyCee

daisymay · 51-55, T

[quote]Buck: Could you charge the President with a crime after he left office?

Mueller: Yes.

Buck: You believe that you could charge the President of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?

Mueller: Yes[/quote]

wompwomp

curiosi · 61-69, F

It's obvious he desperately wants to hang Trump. He has no evidence so he just talks out both sides of his ass.

daisymay · 51-55, T

@curiosi 🤣

daisymay · 51-55, T

[quote]Robert Mueller confirmed that President Trump asked staff to falsify records relevant to the investigation[/quote]

wompwomp

daisymay · 51-55, T

For someone whose cult leader is supposed to be exonerated, you sure seem antsy.

Budwick · 70-79, M

@daisymay [quote]you sure seem antsy.[/quote]

Antsy?
No Daisy, antsy is when the guy you dragged home with you realizes you are a dude! THAT is antsy!

daisymay · 51-55, T

@Budwick [quote]Rep. Adam Schiff: The Trump campaign officials built their messaging strategy around those stolen documents?

Mueller: Generally, that's true.

Schiff: And then they lied to cover it up?

Mueller: Generally, that's true. [/quote]

wompwomp

cherokeepatti · 61-69, F

Couldn’t remember anything that might have implicated him for lying....

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

cherokeepatti · 61-69, F

haha

Add a comment...