You do understand that all this noise about Trump being a racist in dealing with the Squad is because Bubba Clinton visited Jeffrey Epsteins island

Bubba was there 26 times and the MSM needs to distract America from that scandal.

Trump is the one who explicitly wrote stuff any moron would know would cause a media firestorm.

You're speaking like this is an engineered scandal, but if it was, it was engineered by Trump.

There's all sorts of things he doesn't want people talking about, including his own ties to Epstein.

Bill Clinton's awfulness does not diminish Trump's.

View 4 more replies »

redredred · M

@Pikachu "Women on the younger side" only means little girls to pedophiles. Is there something you want to admit?

Pikachu

@redredred

Ordinarily, yes. I'd agree that "on the younger side" wouldn't necessarily invoke the idea of pedophilia.
Buuuut in the context of discussing a man who has been running a sex trafficking ring for 12-14 year old girls and who trump had known for 15 years, it does have a pretty pedophilia ring to it.
Context matters.

You know that. You just don't like it.

Now then. Are you going to stop making deflections with implications of projected pedophilia or is honest discourse beneath you?😉

BlueVeins · 22-25

@redredred Interesting choice, to imply that everyone who understands how pedophiles think is a pedophile, right after explaining how pedophiles think. 🤨

Northwest · M

It's amusing how these stories get better, every time they're told. Especially when told by people like you, who don't understand what fact checking is, and take deep loads from Fox on regular basis.

So, here's what Fox did, a while back, when it was still run by Ailes (and they have not changed much).

They looked at flight records, for the handful of trips Clinton took on Epstein's jet, to visit African countries, as part of the Clinton Foundation work.

When you count all the landings and takeoff, in those countries, that may (if you stretch it), add up to 26.

On top of that, they ignored the fact that this happened in Africa, and made them all landings in the Virgin Islands.

The fact is, Clinton has never been to Epstein's house. Epstein supposedly threw a part for Clinton, but it was one that Clinton did not show up to. Who did? if you guessed Trump you would be right.

Jesus on a rope!

View 16 more replies »

Northwest · M

@GoldenWorm ... or credibility 🤣

MrBrownstone · 46-50, M

@GoldenWorm Or Moron.

Northwest · M

@MrBrownstone I am emphasizing the facts, moron.

Anopenheart · 51-55, M

and the clintons made donald say all those racist things at his rally.. and they made him lead everyone in a "send her home" chant .. yup.. the clintons did all that just to make donald look like a racist even though he isn't.. LOL and they hacked his twitter feed and put all those racist comments on there to ruin his wonderful reputation for being such a kind considered thoughtful intelligent handsome genius

Graylight · 51-55, F

Not a scandal - it's already public knowledge and it in no way detracts from Trump's culpability...with anything.

View 9 more replies »

redredred · M

Okay, I asked two questions and rather than give me a straight-up objective answer to either one you brainlessly quibble over word choice and call me a hypocriteIts clear all you have is hatred for Trump and a painful lack of logic@room101

room101 · 51-55, M

@redredred Oh I see. So, in your trumpist cult-land, not indulging in nonsense whataboutism is synonymous with hypocrisy.

Your opening post is completely deranged and is a clear example of two things. Your hatred for the Clintons (who btw, I couldn't give a rats arse about) and, the classic strategy that all of you trumpettes deploy every time your orange moron says something which shows his woefully defective character ie you deflect attention onto somebody else.

In response to the comment by @Graylight, you asked:

[i]"What culpability? What did he do wrong?"[/i]

I gave you three examples of his wrongdoing, one of which could be deemed as a subjective assessment. The other two are backed up by objective facts which are a matter of public record.

Rather than answer those criticisms, you chose to introduce political personalities. Like that somehow makes his behaviour OK. If that's the case then Clinton is a political personality, why is his behaviour not OK? Answer. Because you're a dishonest hypocrite.

Please take note, that's the first time that I've called you a hypocrite in this discussion. It was @Pikachu who, quite rightly, pointed out your blatant hypocrisy.

I responded by pointing out the flaw in your perspective. You chose to deflect by pretending that you were talking about personality in a general sense. Newsflash. We've all got a personality. Some seek attention more than others and in different ways. A politician should be assessed by the substance of his politics not his friggin' celebrity status.

But the best bit in all of this is you calling for "honest discourse".

Mate, you support trump. A "man" who has empirically and objectively lied an average of nine to ten times every single day of his term in office thus far. Your opening post is dishonest. Pretty much everything that you've said has been dishonest. In short, you wouldn't know "honest discourse" if it came right up to you and slapped you in the face!

Graylight · 51-55, F

@room101 👏

Graylight · 51-55, F

Nope. Pretty sure it's because he's a racist.

Pikachu

Well Unless you have some alternate information, based on Northwest's post, it seems that you might need to retract that claim....

CopperCicada · M

@Pikachu I find it interesting that everything in DC happens at the whim and for the benefit of the Clintons.

Pikachu

@CopperCicada

I don't. They're sex-trafficking, one world government, satanist reptilians.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

But Bubba isnt running for re election of the conservative, family values party. Seems its better to be a racist than a child f*cker in America. There is still a line somewhere, which is nice.