Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Iamalostsoul · 41-45, M
View 1 more replies »
bijouxbroussard · F
SW-User
Iamalostsoul · 41-45, M
@RodionRomanovitch Because Trump supporters are some of the largest drains on public assistance and they don't have money to donate after they spend their welfare money on tickets to watch their king asshole fill their heads with racist nonsense. For all of their "we are superior" BS, red states take the most out of welfare and social support systems while blue states put the most in. To be clear. Red states take out more than they put in. Blue states put in more than they take out. Red state Trumpers claim they are going to be the ones to make America great again while they have been holding us back all along.
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
@Hdryder555 ✌
SW-User
Why? Mexico is paying for it, right? That's what Trump said, and he's an honest and honorable man.
I'm sure they'll get to work on the wall as soon as we get the money from Mexico, obviously. Meanwhile, I'm sure Trump is busy eliminating the entire National Debt. He said he'd do that in 8 years, and since that was two years ago, I'm sure we've already seen a substantial debt reduction.
I'm sure they'll get to work on the wall as soon as we get the money from Mexico, obviously. Meanwhile, I'm sure Trump is busy eliminating the entire National Debt. He said he'd do that in 8 years, and since that was two years ago, I'm sure we've already seen a substantial debt reduction.
Hdryder555 · 61-69, M
@Tracos lol
SimplyTracie · 26-30, F
MorbidCynic · F
MorbidCynic · F
Whatever it takes @RodionRomanovitch
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
SimplyTracie · 26-30, F
@RodionRomanovitch That is a freakin great idea. So many are crazy enough to give money for a worthless cause. Then the owner of the fundraiser can buy a luxurious house on the Mexican Riviera, maybe Cabo San Lucas. Do a little scuba diving. Yeah?
@
TwiddlerofThumbs · F
Lackwittyname · 51-55, M
I would love to see what that would bring in, not 5 Billion, but I am guessing more than we think.
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@Lackwittyname https://fundly.com/build-the-trump-wall-foundation
Hdryder555 · 61-69, M
That's a good idea!
Hdryder555 · 61-69, M
@RodionRomanovitch hey if fools want to fall for it
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@Hdryder555 They already voted for him.
Hdryder555 · 61-69, M
@RodionRomanovitch then let them pay for it, for all good it's going to do, as George Lopez said, my people will find a way around it, you know how I know, guess who's going to build it!
Budwick · 70-79, M
I think it would be far better for democrats to take an interest in border security.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
I thought Mexico was going to pay for it? LOL
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout I've consistently said that I don't think that there is evidence for Trump collusion and that I don't think that moron is even capable of it.
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Where to start ?
"2 years ago and ever since I’ve been saying FISA and uranium one and fusion GP.
Firstly , it's not 'you' who has been saying it , you simply repeat nonsense that you hear from Hannity , Breitbart , Infowars et al.
The FISA abuse 'scandal' was invented by Nunes to distract from Trump's wiretapping accusation.(You missed that one out for some reason) It has been investigated and found to have no merit.
Uranium One 'scandal' a conservative fantasy in which Hillary Clinton somehow engineered the sale of nuclear materials to Russia. A story that was fed to the Times from a book called Clinton Cash, which was written by a Breitbart editor and funded by a political action group tied to Steve Bannon and his billionaire benefactor, Robert Mercer. Essentially, this story is the product of a verifiable swamp of Trumpists. It is [b]not[/b] real , as many DOJ investigations , including the latest one undertaken by AG Jeff Sessions at the behest of Trump , have discovered.
Fusion GPS , by which I suppose you mean the Steele Dossier. A document so prescient it has come to be regarded as a roadmap for investigators. [b]Nothing[/b] in that document has yet been disproved.
"Will bring down Barry, Hillary, rice, Lynch, Comey, mueller.. and the rest of the rats." .... like Burnley , my only response to this is WTF. What planet are you actually living on if you think any of them are in legal jeopardy ?
In conclusion , I'd like to point out just how easy it is for stupid people to be convinced of conspiracy theory nonsense like this. You are an example of it par excellence , so congratulation to you Aussie. Bravo.
Edit: I didn't have time earlier to get around to your last point , so I' will address that now.
"Now the latest development ‘mueller deletes FBI lovers texts messages’ oops.. muellers a bad boy huh. Under investigation and now deleting evidence"
Once again you are repeating a claim started by right-wing conspiracists and repeated by Trump.
From The Independent ;
" Donald Trump has falsely claimed texts between former FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were "wiped clean and gone" – despite a new report revealing the messages were not initially included in a Justice Department probe due to a technical error.
The president tweeted on Saturday: “Wow, 19,000 Texts between Lisa Page and her lover, Peter S of the FBI, in charge of the Russia Hoax, were just reported as being wiped clean and gone.”
“Such a big story that will never be covered by the Fake News,” he continued. “Witch Hunt!”
The FBI’s automated collection tool failed to collect five months of text messages between the agents due to a technology failure, according to a report released by the Justice Department’s office of the inspector general.
During the period in which the texts were unaccounted for, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd acknowledged the automatic tool’s technical errors, blaming the problem on “misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabilities".
The two agents – who have since left the FBI and were swiftly removed from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election – were not found to have committed any wrongdoing related to the texts going unaccounted for during the technical error.
The president also claimed the “Fake News” would not report the development, despite Politco, The Washington Post and several major domestic and international outlets already having published stories about the issues in retrieving the missing messages."
Out of genuine curiosity , what is it exactly that makes you believe and then repeat such easily disprovable nonsense , when to do so clearly make you look like a complete idiot ?
"2 years ago and ever since I’ve been saying FISA and uranium one and fusion GP.
Firstly , it's not 'you' who has been saying it , you simply repeat nonsense that you hear from Hannity , Breitbart , Infowars et al.
The FISA abuse 'scandal' was invented by Nunes to distract from Trump's wiretapping accusation.(You missed that one out for some reason) It has been investigated and found to have no merit.
Uranium One 'scandal' a conservative fantasy in which Hillary Clinton somehow engineered the sale of nuclear materials to Russia. A story that was fed to the Times from a book called Clinton Cash, which was written by a Breitbart editor and funded by a political action group tied to Steve Bannon and his billionaire benefactor, Robert Mercer. Essentially, this story is the product of a verifiable swamp of Trumpists. It is [b]not[/b] real , as many DOJ investigations , including the latest one undertaken by AG Jeff Sessions at the behest of Trump , have discovered.
Fusion GPS , by which I suppose you mean the Steele Dossier. A document so prescient it has come to be regarded as a roadmap for investigators. [b]Nothing[/b] in that document has yet been disproved.
"Will bring down Barry, Hillary, rice, Lynch, Comey, mueller.. and the rest of the rats." .... like Burnley , my only response to this is WTF. What planet are you actually living on if you think any of them are in legal jeopardy ?
In conclusion , I'd like to point out just how easy it is for stupid people to be convinced of conspiracy theory nonsense like this. You are an example of it par excellence , so congratulation to you Aussie. Bravo.
Edit: I didn't have time earlier to get around to your last point , so I' will address that now.
"Now the latest development ‘mueller deletes FBI lovers texts messages’ oops.. muellers a bad boy huh. Under investigation and now deleting evidence"
Once again you are repeating a claim started by right-wing conspiracists and repeated by Trump.
From The Independent ;
" Donald Trump has falsely claimed texts between former FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were "wiped clean and gone" – despite a new report revealing the messages were not initially included in a Justice Department probe due to a technical error.
The president tweeted on Saturday: “Wow, 19,000 Texts between Lisa Page and her lover, Peter S of the FBI, in charge of the Russia Hoax, were just reported as being wiped clean and gone.”
“Such a big story that will never be covered by the Fake News,” he continued. “Witch Hunt!”
The FBI’s automated collection tool failed to collect five months of text messages between the agents due to a technology failure, according to a report released by the Justice Department’s office of the inspector general.
During the period in which the texts were unaccounted for, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd acknowledged the automatic tool’s technical errors, blaming the problem on “misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabilities".
The two agents – who have since left the FBI and were swiftly removed from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election – were not found to have committed any wrongdoing related to the texts going unaccounted for during the technical error.
The president also claimed the “Fake News” would not report the development, despite Politco, The Washington Post and several major domestic and international outlets already having published stories about the issues in retrieving the missing messages."
Out of genuine curiosity , what is it exactly that makes you believe and then repeat such easily disprovable nonsense , when to do so clearly make you look like a complete idiot ?
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@RodionRomanovitch comprehensive burn. 👍😆