Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

IF A Fetus Is Not Human Life...

...but just a meaningless bit of tissue, why should abortion not be allowed for any woman anytime anywhere for any reason? Abortion clinics should be as easy to find as dental clinics. In fact why should a woman even have to GIVE a reason? If abortion is about aborting something that isn't human only a bunch of cells that happen to be inside a woman's body then it has no more moral significance than clipping your toe nails or shaving?

But if it is a human life, please explain why should it ever be legal except for danger to the life of the mother ONLY?

The whole pro-abortion argument is illogical and abortionists can mask their shame by saying they are "pro-choice" but should have the courage (and moral bankruptcy) admit they believe a "fetus" has no more claim to existence than a cyst that needs to be removed, though as a nurse I have yet to encounter a cyst that had a heart beat...

If you admit it is life but are for abortion on demand anyway because a woman has a RIGHT to do with what she has inside her body because she "owns" it even if it is human than ethically your argument is the same as slave owners before the US Civil War who said black slaves were THEIRS because having bought them they OWNED them and had the right to feed or starve or beat or kill them as they wished because they lacked the rights of other human beings because they were black...just like a "fetus" does not cause it cannot pronounce your name.
Agent86 · 51-55, M Best Comment

SheikYerbouti · 51-55, M
Dead things don't grow. Has a human being given birth to anything other than another human? The slave analogy is correct.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@TheSeptikSkeptik I presented that in my opening post but guess you were too high on opioids to notice. I have been waiting ...where is it?

So, having waited, I wondered if life in your septic tank is so boring you must climb out of it to toss a bit of what you live among around before going returning to your natural habitat? Try taking a bath, getting a job, getting a gf/bf and getting a life. Then you just might stop making such an ass out of yourself.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Looks like he is unable to answer my question so his opinion doesn’t count 😀 @Abrienda @TheSeptikSkeptik
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@jackjjackson Of course not. Once we refuse to allow their manipulation of language they are lost. I did give him a simple multiple-choice question on the topic...which he would/will probably fail but if not would have to change his position...and maybe get a less disgusting username.
VolpeTredici · 31-35, M
Whether it is life or not at that point, it will be life. In a lot of cases, abortion is just a get out of jail free card. You get to fuck up, and not be safe, because you have that to fall back on. So in general, morally, it probably shouldn't be legal. Excluding rape victims.
Having said that, if a person is willing to stop that life from happening, do we really want them raising a child? That child is probably doomed, yeah? I'd rather it never have a chance to live than stick it with parents that don't want it. The latter is devastating.
VolpeTredici · 31-35, M
This is still going 😦
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@Pikachu No need. Your arguments were used in the Third Reich to deny life ("personhood"...God how you people distort language to present your positons) and are not worthy of refutation. Before they were used by slave holders in what I believe is your home country.

You embrace death and a soulless view of humanity. Against such a position there is nothing to say that will do you any good. All I can reasonably accomplish is to identify it as I have done so others can see it and not be deceived.
@Abrienda

Woops, you godwin's lawed it there lol

That, my dear, is nothing more than the excuse of intellectual cowardice. Well worded but an excuse none the less.
If you're not up to the debate then simply say so. Don't pretend you've won or don't have to respond.

I thought you were actually interested in having a discussion. If this thread was meant to be a platform for the exchange of viewpoints and a forum for debate then let us debate.
If, however it was meant to be a pedestal from which you would hurl down your righteous fury and dismiss all opposition with vague allusions...well then you'd be a hypocrite.

Remember: in a debate we are seldom attempting to change the mind of our opponents. We generally have too much skin in the game to ever admit that we're wrong. We're debating to change the mind of the observers.

Do you think invoking the nazis and criticizing the worldview you've assigned to me will convince anyone of the truth and/or moral superiority of your position?
I doubt it.
I think an excuse, however eloquent, will been seen for what it is.

So i challenge you once more. If you feel my arguments are in error then address them specifically.
Let's let our arguments speak for themselves.

Your move😉👍
You are good Abrienda! I have not read the comments, but I am sure the sparks were flying about this one. Abortion is a topic that pains me greatly. As far as I'm concerned, a zygote is human life. It is alive, and it is human. It may only be a single cell, but it's a single cell containing human DNA.

I can accept some justifications for abortions...mother's life at risk, rape/incest. But I have a hard time accepting abortion as a justification simply to terminate an unwanted pregnancy - which is by far, the most common reason given for abortion. Pregnancy is so easy to prevent. The truth is rarely told, most unwanted pregnancies occur because no birth control was used, or it was used improperly.

There are those who justify abortion at different points in time during the pregnancy. Some believe it's ok very early in the pregnancy, while others are comfortable killing the baby at any time as long as it hasn't left the birth canal.

Some feel that abortions are justified until the baby is viable. And viability to those means that the baby can survive outside the womb. But can a baby really survive on its own outside of the womb? A baby still cannot feed itself, clean up after itself, or protect itself from the elements...that still requires human intervention, be it the womb, the mother or someone else. I cannot justify it in my mind, but I understand the law even if I don't agree.

But the hypocrisy can be stunning. There are those who think nothing of destroying a fetus. And who could be more innocent? But some of these same folks oppose the death penalty even for the most evil killers in our society. A very difficult subject.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Should be BA. @BizSuitStacy
SW-User
It's sad that it's only counted as a life when it's wanted. The same people who make the laws legalizing abortion, with a flick of a pen, claim double murder when a pregnant woman is killed. It's either a life or it isn't.... and anyone who says it isn't is fooling themselves or is a straight up liar.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@SW-User Brilliant! It is a "fetus" or its a baby when it serves their purposes...it destroys all faith on law and hope for justice.
[quote]but should have the courage (and moral bankruptcy) admit they believe a "fetus" has no more claim to existence than a cyst that needs to be removed[/quote]

Minus your value judgement, i'm perfectly happy to admit that.

You're wrong in your definitions though. A fetus IS a human. It has human DNA.
But it's not a person and therefor has no rights, much less rights over a woman's body.
Furthermore, even if it WAS a person (and it isn't, we can debate that if you're up for it) then it STILL doesn't matter because no person has the right to make use of another person's body against their will.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
No, I think not. We are as far apart as those in the United States who were pro-slavery and the abolitionists. But what is truly horrifying? I believe you actually believe a woman carrying a child for 9 months IS enduring a form of slavery, yes? If yes it shows like most forms of psychopathy such a view is simply immune to all logic, rational thought, life experience, common decency or love of humanity.

By the way...I have been to an abortion clinic. Have you ever been to a maternity ward? Ever had a child or remember when you were one? After you stopped being just a cluster of cells, of course.

Finally being a man, and if you were honest, you would admit most of your support for abortion is based on self-interest. As long as abortion is legal, free, and easy, you are freed of any obligations for your actions. And if you think that makes you or other men more manly, we again disagree.
OggggO · 36-40, M
So, if a fetus must be carried to term because all life is sacred, do you also insist that once born it should be guaranteed health care, food, and shelter so it doesn’t end up dead anyway? All life is sacred, after all.
Cmstars · 22-25, F
@OggggO But you dont believe human life should be protected in all stages of life or am I misunderstanding?
OggggO · 36-40, M
@Cmstars When did I say or imply such?
Cmstars · 22-25, F
@OggggO Well as I said, perhaps I misunderstood.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@Waymore Those were his words. "Some Catholics are too obsessed with the issue of abortion when there are other issues to address." I guess Francis meant Catholics like me. He then said we should be more concerned with climate change. I wonder if he had this revelation after he washed the feet of Moslems during Easter or promoted homosexuals and pedophiles to positons of authority in the Church.

I spit on him.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Abrienda · 26-30, F
Yes. Climate change is a natural not a man made occurrence. Ask the Anasazi Indians. Abortion on the other hand is preventable.
VSonMe · 56-60, M
Most abortions occur before the potential baby is a fetus. The morning-after pill for example destroys what is simply a cluster of undifferentiated cells. An early abortion, which most are, kills a zygote. It is too early for it to be called a fetus. I don't consider this to be killing a human as at that stage it is not a human but only a potential human.

I commit mass murder every day when I have a wank. Every sperm I spurt onto my chest had a chance at becoming my offspring - until I wiped it off and flushed it.

Later stage abortions are rarer and not typically seen by anyone as inconsequential. They usually occur because the fetus is not developing properly or because the mother's health is endangered. An actual life has to take precedence over potential life.
VSonMe · 56-60, M
@Cmstars that's close but not entirely correct without further clarification.

Let me answer the 2 questions separately.

1. When does a zygote/fetus become human?

You can see that this has different answers depending on what aspect of human you mean. You could answer from the viewpoint of a biologist or a Catholic priest or a lawyer to give 3 examples.

I was primarily answering from a legal perspective. When you say that a human being exists, it immediately has human rights. Does it make sense that a zygote is considered human? Does it make sense that a 12 week fetus is considered human? How about a 20 week fetus? You see the point? It's a continuum from conception to birth. It makes sense and is what society recognizes to say a human exists when it enters the world.

2. I believe in early pregnancy, the mother should be free to abort. After a certain point, it should be (and is) restricted to be performed only if its development is not normal and it will not live long or healthily or if the mother's health is compromised.

The choice to abort because of abnormalities is difficult for everyone but this should be between the mother and her doctor primarily.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@VSonMe Right...you are done here. I can take that shower now...better make it a long BATH!
Cmstars · 22-25, F
@VSonMe Right but your argument now gives legal protection to potential humans, based on your own definitions.

Why not 12 weeks again? Because it's not viable? If science changes to the point of making it viable, will your views change?

Thanks for considering and the friendly dialogue.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
I still don’t understand why the father gets no input.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@jackjjackson Exactly...maybe if they were made to feel a PART of the process there would be fewer abortions and fewer single-mother households.
TheSeptikSkeptik · 46-50, M
I disagree about it being illogical. Pro-lifers are the illogical ones. Supreme Court has already ruled that taking away a woman's rights to provide the fetus special rights is unconstitutional. Bodily autonomy. If you need me to explain why it is illogical, then I will. If you were a father and your child needed a kidney to survive, should that Father be forced to donate the kidney? I wish people would stop using the term "illogical" to promote their own illogical point of view.
TheSeptikSkeptik · 46-50, M
Slavery and a fetus? False equivalency. Go learn logic before dictating to me how it works because you are just making one giant argument form ignorance. Your whole post is incredibly fallacious. Any more of this shit and I will gladly point out all of the informal logical fallacies made in your post.
TheSeptikSkeptik · 46-50, M
@Abrienda "he isn't very well educated. But then those on the other side of this argument cannot be or else they would not be there in the first place." Wow. Nice hasty generalization. Another logical fallacy. Who is the uneducated one here? Amazing. Dunning Kruger in action right here bois.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@TheSeptikSkeptik OH! The AMERICAN Supreme Court said so! Well that's alright then. As if that applies to other countries...and even if it did have you heard of Dred Scott? THAT was a Supreme Court ruling too? Shall I find you some others that were overturned because the reasoning was found intellectually and morally bankrupt.

And this is your example of thr superiot logic of the abortionist argument/

Try this Mr Superior Logician. 1) Woman has sex. 2) Woman becomes pregnant. 3)All things being normal and with any outside agency, like an abortionist of someone like you kicking her in the stomach,, what will she give birth too? I have made it multiple choice for you -let's see if get it right?

a) a car
b) a piano
c) a human
d) a table

Now in case you don't know, the correct answer is 'c'...you with me? Good.

Now Mr Superior Logician...tell me the exact moment from inception to birth the baby suddenly becomes a HUMAN LIFE FORM? Day 1? Day 61? Day 101 and 3 hours> Day 101, 3 hours, 10 seconds? And when is it not?

If you had ever taken a course in logic you would now just slink back into you septic tank because any linear answer you give will refute your entire position. Of course I understand why you and the other "men" here argue so strongly the case for abortion...which has NOTHING to do with "body autonomy" and you know it! It is so you can (if you get her drugged first) have sex with a woman then if she gets pregnant you can run away from your responsibilities by telling her to "take care" of it at the local PP..."it" being your baby. And in your sick mind you will consider yourself a "gentleman" by offering to pay for it.

The lesson for you is over.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@VSonMe Ah yes simplistic ... from one of the top minds in...?

I am quite happy to let people who were not aborted when they were just a cluster of cells read your confused attack against my exegesis on the illogic and hypocrisy of the pro-death oh sorry pro-abortion or SORRY pro-choice "argument" which you failed to address...for obvious reasons

Please, please your insecurity is showing, Just go write a check to PP...make yourself feel good about yourself. Maybe the local PP clinic you donate to will send you a pair of these for Christmas as a way of expressing their gratitude...in case you don't know they are Embryotomy Scissors used to cut off the heard, arms and feet of a cell cluster when its being aborted...maybe you can hang it on the wall in your front room above the TV or fireplace...or give it to your son or daughter when they are born? After all it may have been your money that paid for them, "proud" donator to PP.

And remember...by all means be proud of what you have funded.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@VSonMe That is a ridiculous term. It is either human or it is not. Or are you so ashamed of the moral and linguistic pretzels you must make that you cannot acknowledge that?

So...you are in favor of death for "potential humans"? When does a "human" stop being a "potential" one, Doctor Mengele? I would stop worrying about my "simplistic' arguments and start worry about your Orwellian ones.

Are you really so obscenely dishonest that you must create the ridiculous category of "potential" human to cover your shame??

Honestly you are so morally repulsive I feel I must take a shower after chatting with you.
VSonMe · 56-60, M
@Abrienda well you prove my point about your unsophisticated thought process.

And way to go with the insults! After calling me rude for calling you an unsophisticated thinker, you now compare me to Dr Mengele!
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@VSonMe "Potential human beings"? Yes that's Mengelian. It should scare anyone near you that you don't know that.

Look I visited your profile and read your groups. Consider yourself lucky I used that comparison. You are absolutely too creepy for me to continue any sort of dialogue with on any kind of subject. I am grateful we are on opposite sides of this debate.

You have one more post in reply then I am blocking you. You are just too creepy to have around. Enjoy embracing death. And good luck editing the sex tapes you wrote you enjoy making.

Done and dusted.
Cmstars · 22-25, F
Fetus - an unborn offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn HUMAN baby more than eight weeks after conception.

Humans beget humans. Seems pretty simple.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@Cmstars Seems so but abortionists now use that word to de-humanize pregnancy. That's why I call them what they are and what they advocate (for others but not their OWN mothers of course) what it is...infanticide.
I have known medical professionals who provided abortions as part of a larger comprehensive OB-GYN practice. Not a single one framed abortion as anything other than killing a fetus.

I have also known women who have received abortions. Not a single one framed abortion as anything other than killing a fetus.
@Abrienda Of course it's killing a life.

If it wasn't killing a life it wouldn't be killing a fetus. If it's not a life it's not a fetus.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@CopperCicada I am glad you are willing to admit that ... so are you then in favor of murder on demand?
@Abrienda We've had this conversation before. In summary: I'm not in favor of killing. If you want to come back at me for being a pacifist, I agree in self-defense, including pre-emptive acts of self-defense. If you want to push me into a political position, I advocate for eliminating the root causes of abortion as I do other forms of violence.
Mahaq · F
Fetus is fully developed baby .. it’s same like an egg of a hen .. if the egg of a hen does half way when u keep in incubator it’s half made baby same is with the featus u can’t say it’s a piece of tissue
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@Mahaq Logic of course supports our position...I am waiting to hear an abortion supporter saying "My wife is carrying a six month old fetus" or "My sister is with fetus."
Mahaq · F
Okay .. are you a supporter of abortion ?@Abrienda
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Abrienda Profound? No. Accurate? Yes.

Sorry if you don't like it.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@daisymay When I said "profound" I was being sarcastic. However I delete trolls so unless you have something to contribute other than snarky comments please do.
daisymay · 51-55, T
@Abrienda How is pointing out that you can't control when people have sex not contributing? Did you not say, indirectly, that you wished you could do just that?

[quote]stop acting as if sex is just another form of dessert or recreation[/quote]

Because that's what it looks like.

By the way, an embryo is not a fetus.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@VolpeTredici There is of course adoption. Many Americans go to Africa and Asia and Russia to find babies to adopt...there seems to be more than enough Americans ready to adopt these unwanted children. It is THERE that government and Church should focus money and efforts...instead of funding abortion why not fund adoption?
VolpeTredici · 31-35, M
@Abrienda And yet we have countless orphaned children in America. These people adopting from other countries just want to be special. Probably name their child Miracle or some shit 🙄
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@VolpeTredici Hahahah! I am afraid you are right. How many American-born children did Bradgelina or Madonna adopt? However if adoption was made easier and women were helped carry to term that would be the more civilized thing to do.
VolpeTredici · 31-35, M
@Abrienda Agreed
AnonymousJSS · 22-25, F
I agree!!!!! Abortion IS wrong
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@AnonymousJSS Yes...morally, ethically. religiously and logically. Even the atheist intellectual Christopher Hitchens believed so.
AnonymousJSS · 22-25, F
@Abrienda I'm agnostic and I definitely think it's wrong.
Agent86 · 51-55, M
I respectfully disagree.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@Agent86 Thank you and I appreciate your excellent manners so rarely found here but I am afraid logic is against you on this.
Agent86 · 51-55, M
@Abrienda I don't know about that, I don't think so.
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@Agent86 Of course not because you are not being logical. If you believe abortion is murder then you are logical...which makes you a baby=killer. If you don't then it is upon you not me to show that, without interruption, that from the moment of inception a human life will not be born, or that at any point in the process interruption would NOT mean a human life was born.

The pro-life position is the default position; it is up to you and yours to prove otherwise.

Good luck with that.
This message was deleted by its author.
@unearthed

[quote]Yeah it seems like pro choice people do dance around the fact that sex makes babies.[quote][/quote][/quote]

I don't think anyone is pretending that sex doesn't make babies. I think anti-choice folks do a tap dance pretending that if you have sex then somehow you're obligated to carry the baby to term. I need to see a better argument than "well you knew sex makes babies".

A fetus does need the woman's body to survive. And?
If you need my kidney to survive am i obligated to give it to you?
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@unearthed Its a meaningless phrase. There are no such "absolutes" it is a fatuous made-up phrase to pseudo-legalistic weight to simple murder-for-convenience.

My "bodily autonomy" ends when it interferes with another life...and the last time I was in biology class that life inside me is human.
This message was deleted by its author.

 
Post Comment