Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

It's an Obama thing, so get rid of it..

Even if it's going to be detrimental to bees...After all, they're only responsible for a third of the food we eat...But wait!! Not if the GMO lobby can expand their ambitions, they don't need bees, in fact, they're a bad thing. Make sterile crops, sell more seeds to grow more crops. Oh, and there's the hunters too to consider...



https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45068650

[quote]The Trump administration has overturned bans on the use of pesticides linked to declining bee populations and the cultivation of genetically modified crops in US national wildlife refuges.

The move, reversing a policy adopted in 2014, has attracted heavy criticism from environmentalists.

It was announced in a memo by the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Limited agricultural activity is allowed on some national wildlife refuges.

Study 'shows neonic pesticides harm bees'
The Fish and Wildlife Service's deputy director, Greg Sheehan, said in the memo that the blanket ban on neonicotinoid pesticides and GM crops on refuges would end, with decisions about their use being made on a case-by-case basis.

He said genetically modified organisms helped "maximise production", and that neonics might be required "to fulfil needed farming practices".

Mr Sheehan added that the move on GM crops would improve the supply of food for migratory birds including ducks and geese, which are shot by hunters on many of the nation's refuges.[/quote]
Graylight · 51-55, F
Excellent, because the dire warnings about the chain effect of declining bee populations hasn't been at the forefront of ecological discussions for, like, ten years now.

There's ignoring science and then there's battling science in the name of personal enrichment. Trump will understand when he reaches his particular circle of hell.
OggggO · 36-40, M
Neonicotinids have nothing to do with GMOs, and GMOs have nothing to do with bee deaths.
Ynotisay · M
@OggggO And yet, for some reason, you'll take an opinion piece over peer-reviewed studies. Find that kind of interesting given your comments about "pro-science" and an "ax to grind."
I can't repeat what I've already said a few times about what this issue us REALLY about. Chemicals in wildlife refuges. You're clearly ignoring that so I'll just exit stage left. Thanks.
OggggO · 36-40, M
@Ynotisay It’s not an opinion piece, it’s an explanation of said study, and other studies. Sorry I don’t find things scary just because they have are a “chemical”. Everything is a chemical.
Ynotisay · M
@OggggO Now you're pushing my buttons dude. I said I was done. I said thanks. That's not enough, huh?
And yeah dude. It was opinion. Commentary on other people's work on an insignificant website.
And 'scary?' Is that what I was said man? Did you see where I said I choose my words carefully? Was there anything there remotely associated to being scared? I still have no fucking idea why you won't acknowledge what I've said repeatedly about what the real issue here is though. I'm sure you have your reasons.
If you see my name again here don't put freaking words in mouth or presume my thoughts, ok? I can handle my shit just fine.
I'd say don't write me back on this but it's pretty clear you're one of those guys so...whatever.
Ynotisay · M
While the European Union expands the bans.
Because America. And Because Freedom.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Not too many studies on GM crops because many countries hate the idea of just what the environmental effects could be should they be adopted.

Trump. Ever desperate to make a buck. Trump will either be a hero that feeds the world or the villain that poisons the planet.

Risk worth taking ???
HerKing · 61-69, M
@Picklebobble2 When Tony Blair was PM in the UK, he had a cabinet member called Micheal Meacher who was pushing the GM crop thing and with a straight face said that the test fields being placed 50 metres from other crops (None GM) wouldn't risk the bees cross contaminating. No-one told him how far bees fly or that they're not up to speed with invisible boundaries.
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
Food allergies never existed before GMO’s.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
Pherick · 41-45, M
@MrBrownstone Yea thats not even remotely true.

 
Post Comment