royal wedding
ok not quiet policitics but osrt of is, its the roayl wedding this week but who should be paying for it, the police, etc
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
SomeMichGuy · M
Good question...
It seems that there should have been a big income boost to the UK for this (travel/lodging/food/transportation, gifts/commemorative stuff, more tourists to sites, fees for access to BBC feeds or other tv/radio income)...
Seems to me that the royals should front the cost and get reimbursed from the income streams they created, with the excess going to the British Treasury...
It seems that there should have been a big income boost to the UK for this (travel/lodging/food/transportation, gifts/commemorative stuff, more tourists to sites, fees for access to BBC feeds or other tv/radio income)...
Seems to me that the royals should front the cost and get reimbursed from the income streams they created, with the excess going to the British Treasury...
View 3 more replies »
SomeMichGuy · M
@milkymum1 but don't these visitors purchase good & services on which there are taxes? Wouldn't those benefit more than just locals?
and some of the goods are British-made (like royal Doulton[sp?])...and the services are British-provided...so doesn't that help keep ppl working...?
and some of the goods are British-made (like royal Doulton[sp?])...and the services are British-provided...so doesn't that help keep ppl working...?
SomeMichGuy · M
@milkymum1 RD made in China & Thailand?! oh my...ty for the info...I figured pride of the monarch's imprimature would keep it in Britain...
😣
😣
Thingschange4444 · 51-55, M
briggsie25 · 61-69, M
@Thingschange4444 they should be ashamed of themselves,spending millions on a wedding, when there is so much need for the money to be used for the greater good
SW-User
everything for the wedding
from the dressmaker
to the jeweller
to the drinks people
the food farmers
and the flowers
and so on
should be sponsored
and not come from the taxpayer
it can be advertising for them
oh no but then again
that would cheapen the event and we cannot have that lol
you have to be able to brag about the amount spent
from the dressmaker
to the jeweller
to the drinks people
the food farmers
and the flowers
and so on
should be sponsored
and not come from the taxpayer
it can be advertising for them
oh no but then again
that would cheapen the event and we cannot have that lol
you have to be able to brag about the amount spent
briggsie25 · 61-69, M
briggsie25 · 61-69, M
@milkymum1Correct!!!. Her dress is £300,000 and we are paying for it.
It's disgraceful
It's disgraceful
briggsie25 · 61-69, M
@milkymum1 and all the homeless in the area are being moved on in the build up to this farce.
The money it's costing should be used to find housing for them.
Wouldn't hate the Royals so much if they paid their own way
The money it's costing should be used to find housing for them.
Wouldn't hate the Royals so much if they paid their own way
bhatjc · 46-50, M
it's a little of both. It's all coming from the tax payers. The Security part was the big money drain. But look at how much money that event brought into town. The hotels,the restaurants,and others places. Where making bank from all the tourist into town. It kind of paid for it's self
Jm31xxx · 41-45, M
I think tourists end up paying.
Jm31xxx · 41-45, M
Yeah but the are voluntarily choosing to go
SatyrService · M
why, the ROYAL FAMILY! not like they dont have the money, right?
milkymum1 · 31-35, F
@SatyrService yes plenty of it
Coolkid77 · 31-35, M
I honestly could care less about the royal wedding.
Dshhh · M
the royal family
choppers2244 · M
i wont be watching it
bijouxbroussard · F
Who paid when William married ? 🤔
milkymum1 · 31-35, F
@bijouxbroussard the tax payer and thats not what im aksing is it, dick head
bijouxbroussard · F
@milkymum1 Why so nasty ? I honestly didn’t know. Why would things be different this time ?
