Trump haters and Russia conspiracy loons:

@LvChris Oh is this seriously just a copy and paste job??? I wouldn't doubt it ;)

I do love the "I am going post some smack talk, and then never come back to defend it" ;)

@therighttothink50 yes, the fbi and doj's Rosenstein are trying very hard to keep that fisa application out of congress's hands. I believe we know why. But they will be forced to provide it.

@akindheart You need to dedicate yourself to one hour a night of Hannity, he has been relentless every night fighting the good fight.

@therighttothink50 i sure will! thanks for the lesson today

@katielass We got someone real. The problem is the real we got was a con job. We need a leader. If one realizes that one full year has has gone by and NOTHING has been done--at all---other than Tweeting and golf--make all of us conclude we all got screwed on this deal. Or at least it should. The cult thinks everyone in America wants him to fail but them. That's stupidity on top of stupidity. NO ONE wants to see him fail.....but we do want to see him do something. Golf for 1/3 of the days he's been in office isn't it. Tweeting to rip up veterans--dead ones especially--his own party members---everyone and everything that he thinks is out to get him---is NOT leadership. The things you mention are "verbal stands"---not things executed on for the good of America. He talks a good game--but no one is playing on the field. I know by reading your words that you have the same things in common with those that voted for Rump--a strong sense of racism--feeling disinfranchaised---but not actually being helped. The fact the first lady is actually classy--when in fact she was a stripper and a porn star when Rump first saw her--and she---and he---willing committed adultry with him to gold dig. But she's not the topic. The ideas he protrays are not that bad---but they are only rhetoric. He's said what we'd gonna do---but never done it. In fact 90% of it already had been taken off the table--reversed or forgotten. WE--all of us--want to be a better nation. But it's not happening. For a year---nothing. The Dems have been the miniorty in both houses the entire hes been in office. Yet all we hear is "the Dems are blocking us". From what? How? For a year it's been like watching a hockey game with only one team on the ice yet they can't make a goal. And th Russian thing. It's been one sandal after another since he took office. NO ONE wants that---we want a presdient and we got this. And "this" has turned out to be a circus. Only 4 people he orignally appointed in his inner circle are still there. 500 unfilled posts in everything from Homeland security to ambassaforship to ally countires....FEMA even. Puerto Rico given the finger. Whatever the dreams were---we have a circus. And if you think "we'er" happy about that---you're dead wrong.

I know you're merely repeating what you've heard from the corrupt trump hating media but it's just not true. He has signed more than 100 bills, and you can't name anything he should be doing that he hasn't done or is working on. The time to whine about nothing getting done was when harry reid let more than 400 bipartisan house bills sit on his desk for more than 2 years and then they were void.

Look up "cognitive dissosence". You most likely have ONE news source....that tells you what THEY want you to know. NOT hard to see that in what you say. Logic and thought works in a normal conversation because both sides understand the value of an open mind. FOX encourages you--Rump encourages you--to NEVER seek out what might be true--but rather immediately refuse to listen to it if it contradicts what FOX and those who pays them wants you to know. You are a series of Hannidy talking points.....all laced together as "facts". Talking with you is like listening to a talk show---HOST---that is paid to spoon feed those that watch FOX just EXACTLY the spin they want to you hear--then hope you repeat it. And you do. "Signed 100 bills"...........but you can't name one. Lost cause here. I knew that going in--but was bored at a slack time here so I figured..what the heck..jump in. But this is like listening to Miller and Kellyanne Conjob. Made up numbers passed off as fact---bluster that is supposed to intimidate--- but if asked if you can back that up by naming those "100 bills"---out comes the name calling because there's nothing of substance in your arsneal of "facts" to back the claims. I'll give you this-----you are a great student of the brainwash...and Hannidy. Bored now. Your idol will go down in history as a joke. By the time you see that---he'll be old news---but never lost to comedians as new material. He never won the first election--he has the chance of a snowball in hell of even making it to the next one. Even if he serves this term out----he'll be slaughtered in the primaries for next one. Then------you and those who cheerlead for him will be left wondering what happened....to God on earth?? The damage he's doing now---will be his and his supporters legacy to the U.S. Not something to be proud of. The tax scam alone won't last a month when he's gone and nothing else he's done has been a signed "law" or "bill" so it has no lasting substance at all. His only accomplishments are signed E.O's and as fast as Obama's went---so will his. In a month after the next one takes office everything that was in place before him--will be back in place. And after the midterms to come guess who'll be in the minority then and in no position stop the slaughter of his legacy--such as it is. Dont think so? Watch the real news and you might. Not one person Rump has supported for election has won. America is speaking--he stinks. The only ones not listening is the cult. You will. November 2018--and when Mueller is finished. No more of you. Bye now.

@Nipper66 hehehe :)

@Nipper66 nip slip?

@Northwest 😁👋
Is as deep as I'm gonna go in political discussions! 😁😜

@Sniper thanks for your opinion! 😊

@katielass thanks for your opinion too!😊

@Nipper66 not sure what ur talking about but thanks for your input! 😊

@rhouse ignored

@questionWeaver These left wing freaks think mentioning Alex Jones is the end of the argument. Alex Jones is one source of news among many who are anti-globalist and freedom loving. Alex Jones is more newsworthy than MSNBC, CNN, The Washington Post and NY Times. Alex Jones does have a soul.

@Sniper What proof do you have that the copies I have seen all over the net have been redacted?

@Sniper Oh god, I would take directions to the corner from that woman. She is a nut bag, plain and simple.

@Sniper [quote]maybe YOU should read them[/quote]

I am. It's 312 pages, so I am not finished, but I went through a 1st pass.

[quote]But you can't because they've been heavily redacted. Didn't know that, did you?[/quote]

You really should not ask someone a question, and then answer it yourself. It could be embarrassing for you, and in fact it is.

The transcript is 312 pages long.

Page 17 has a single name deleted.
Page 19 has a couple of names deleted from 6 locations or so
Page 29 has a single name deleted
Page 166 has a single name deleted
Page 177 has a single name deleted

This is done to protect the parties that are not part of this thing.

Anything else you want to ask, answer, and then be wrong about?

[quote]Stop being programmed by your far left masters and get some information from someone other than Rachel Madcow.[/quote]

I get my information myself, but given how quickly you jumped on the "redacted" thing, I can safely assume you got your information from some right wing misinformation site. Who's the master and who's the slave, I wonder?

Here, let me help you out:

http://bit.ly/2CWRtdE

This was a link to the actual document. Read it, and for once, start thinking for yourself.

@anythingoes477 The difference is they do not require reasonable cause. Pretty much all they have to do is CLAIM this American is colluding with a foreigner against the United States. It is very different from the regular process. That's why it exists, because it's DIFFERENT. Did you not pay attention when this was passed after 9/11? The purpose was to make it EASIER to get a warrant and to get one FASTER for "national security". It pretty much ignores the 4th amendment but it is supposed to be used ONLY for national security cases where the government needs to find out if a suspect is plotting an attack. It was not intended to be used for political purposes. In a regular court documents would have to be provided to support probable cause. In the case of the FISA court the WORD of the applicant is all that is required.

@katielass But that "cause" is automatic. ANY calls made from a U.S. phone--wire or cell is automatically intercepted if it goes to a hostile nation. The recording is done automatically. When it is---proof exists that a person in the U.S. is communicating for some r4eason with a hostile nation. After 9/11 that was a provision of Homeland Security rules changes. In fact it was happening for years prior. When that bell goes off-----it draws attention. FISA understands one contact has to be made--to make amnyone aware more might be. The tap they OK is to catch the following calls. You are createing a difference without a distinction. Word game.

@anythingoes477 We're not talking about that. Read up on it before you try discussing it.

@Sniper Yep, didn't think you would be able to post anything that backed up your claims.

Care to try again?

@Pherick I can't believe I missed this! So good. "Obozo" "Hillary" and "fake" all worked in. He did miss "libtard" and "CNN" in the original post. I give it an 8 out of 10 on the wingnut hilarity scale.

@Sniper Oh, but this administration embraces "alternative facts", even in the face of things like direct photographic, video, and testimonial evidence. XD

@TexChik oblamo is a bitch too you know. A tunic wearing bend over bitch.

@katielass yes he is complicit ... when the news hits I suspect he will
Be out of the country

@TexChik No need to be, no one is going to indict a black former president. IDC what he's done. And anyone who thinks the witch will be indicted is dreaming too. Everyone around them will fall but not them. It's the swamp protecting the swamp critters.

@Northwest i read it. i can figure it out. don't patronize me. i can't wait for this to all come out.

@akindheart Actually, I am interested in your take on it,

I admit I do not know everything going on. I will wait to see how this plays out. (sorry on a work call)

@questionWeaver What cracks me up is they never even try to defend her or the dnc, obviously they can't but they keep saying this is nothing but a deflection from the Russia investigation. They're trying to distract you from the Russia investigation. lol Well, one, distract from the fact that there is still no evidence of any crime? yes, that makes so much sense. Not.
And two, we understand the dems might be able to focus on only one thing at a time but the rest of us can multi task.